Title: Phlogiston - dephlogisticated air - Lavoisier
1Phlogiston - dephlogisticated air - Lavoisier
2Why do things burn?
Early Greeks ? element fire
Alchemists ? principle of sulfur
Phlogiston Cavendishs inflammable air?
3Georg Ernest Stahl (1660 1734)
Johann Joachim Bechter(1635 1682)
- Tera pinguis
- principle of inflammability
- Principle is phlogiston
- (Greek to set on fire)
4Phlogiston Theory
The Elements according to Becher (1669) and
Stahl Three Elements and Three Earths
Fire, Air, and Water (as before)
Sub-classified old concept of earth by
different responses to combustion
- Vitreous (inert) earth
- Volatile (distillable) earth
- Combustible earth phlogiston (Stahl)
5Becher Stahl Theory
- Flames extinguished ? air saturated with
phlogiston.
- Mice die in airtight space ? air saturated with
phlogiston
- Charcoal ? little ash after burning (nearly
pure phlogiston)
- Ores smelted into pure metals because
phlogiston transferred from charcoal to ore
- Heat metals ? phlogiston released into air
leaving calx
- Rusting of metal ? equivalent to burning of wood
6Phlogiston
combined with other substances - condition not
perceivable by the senses
COMBINED PHLOGISTON, or combined fire
phlogiston dislikes freedom always striving to
conceal itself in combustible substance.
7Phlogiston
escaped as substance burned, ? apparent to
senses as fire or flame
FREE phlogiston
Combustible objects rich in phlogiston
8Phlogiston
after burning? original substance minus
phlogiston
To restore original combustible substance ?
heat residue with something that burned easily -
freed phlogiston combines with residue
9Phlogiston
explanation
- more combustible a substance, more phlogiston it
contained
- free phlogiston sought to combine with suitable
substance
- mix phlogisticating agents, such as charcoal,
phosphorus, oils, fats, etc., with the residue of
the original substance
- heat mixture ? phlogiston freed unites with the
residue.
10Phlogiston
Wood is high in phlogiston
Charcoal is high in phlogiston
- Calx is low in phlogiston
11Problems with Phlogiston Theory
combustion and rusting ? different versions of
the same phenomenon?
? combustion of wood phlogiston leaves so
rapidly it heats its surroundings and becames
visible as flame
? rusting -- loss of phlogiston slower and no
flame appears
Wood burns ash lighter loss phlogiston
rusty metal (calx) heavier when phlogiston lost?
Positive and negative weight phlogiston?
12No Problems with weight
Not worried about accurate measurements
variation in weight an unimportant "accident"
Weight changes ? only thought about solids
Weight change gases but only worried about
existence
phlogiston light, lightened substance
containing it ? driving it out of metal naturally
left residue heavier.
Stahl ? Weight increase due to air entering
metal to fill vacuum left after phlogiston escaped
13Phlogiston Theory
phlogiston theory was a step towards chemistry
and away from alchemy.
Moved away from idea of a "spirit" in metals
that could not be seen, felt, or appreciated by
any of the senses
substituted principle of phlogiston ? more
tangible than the "spirit,"
- could be seen and felt as free phlogiston
- weighed and measured as combined phlogiston.
14Phlogiston Theory
Universal explanation for all the known chemical
phenomena?
as experiments multiplied, became evident theory
failed to satisfactorily explain certain
laboratory reactions.
modifications introduced giving theory a
flexibility to cover all cases.
15Phlogiston
modifications contradicted each others ?
simple theory too cumbersome from number of
modifications
no satisfactory substitute better than anything
before or could be suggested.
phlogiston theory cannot be said to have
finally succumbed until the opening years of the
nineteenth century.
16Need to think gases
explanation of changes in weight during
combustion due to gases that appeared or
disappeared while the products were forming
but no attempt in Stahl's day to take gases
into account except to note their existence.
17Need to think gases
The Gases Ash was lighter than wood? what about
vapors given off by burning wood? Not considered.
Rust heavier than metal, but had rust gained
anything from the air? Not considered.
Before deficiency could be corrected, chemists
had to grow more familiar with gases and the
problems with confining for study.
18Pneumatic Trough
19Joseph Priestly (1733 1804)
Identified seven distinct airs with mercury
trough
Lack of conclusions concerning his data
Others made use of them in developing their
theories
Produced a brick-red calx when heated mercury
in air
20Priestleys new air
- Discovered another form of air
- Mercury heated in air ?formed a red substance
the precipitate per se or calx ( mecuric
oxide) - When heated with no air - calx changed back into
mercury and gave off a gas with most unusual
properties - Mice were particularly active in the new air
Priestley tried breathing some and found
himself feeling particularly light and easy
for some time afterwards. Who can tell but that,
in time, this pure air may become a fashionable
article in luxury"
21Priestley and dephlogsticated air
- Combustibles burned more brilliantly and rapidly
in this gas - A smoldering splint of wood thrust into a
container of the gas burst into flame - Priestley explained this phenomenon in terms of
the phlogiston theory - Splint of wood must given off phlogiston at a
rapid pace - The gas must have little or no phlogiston
allowing it to accept the new phlogiston so
easily - Priestley therefore called his new gas
"dephlogisticated air"
22Priestley - dephlogisticated air
Component of ordinary air
Responsible for combustion
Made animal respiration possible
23Cavendish burns inflammable air
- One theory ? phlogistication produces fixed air
- But, Cavendish showed
- Inflammable air common air explosion and what
remained didnt cause precipitation of limewater
not fixed air - What was it?
24Cavendish burns inflammable air
- Burned inflammable air common air in closed
container - No loss of weight
- Inside of vessel became dewy
- 423 measures inflammable air phlogisticated 1000
measures of common air (optimal 2 volumes
inflammable to 1 volume dephlogisticated air) - Note
- Cavendish still interprets in terms of phlogiston
theory - Lavoisier rejects phlogiston theory interprets as
evidence water not a simple substance but product
of the combustion of two gases - Hard blow at Greek theory of the elements
25Cavendish and increase in weight of calx
- Dephlogisticated air (water F)
Dephlogisticated air inflammable air (F)
water or (F waterELEMENTAL)
Calx (earthy base of metal - F ) water ?
weight
Heat calx ? F from water combines with calx
(earthy base metal F) to form metal
water devoid of F becomes dephlogisticated air
26Lavoisier (1743 1794)
Quantification
No Transmutation
No Phlogiston
Conservation of Mass
New Chemical Nomenclature
27Attack on Myth of Transmutation - late 1770s
- Lowering of levels of oceans attributed to a
transformation of water into earth - Hypothesis accepted by chemists who boiled and
found an earthy residue at the bottom of
container - Lavoisier boiled water for a hundred days in a
"pelican - Showed residue not due to transmutation of water,
but to dissolving of pelican's inner surface - Applied quantitative analysis
- Weighing before and after experiment
28Lavoisier and Combustion
Heat metals in closed containers with limited
supply of oxygen
Maximum amount of calx formed (air saturated
with phlogiston??)
Calx known to weigh more than metal
But, metal, calx, air, flask weighed same
before and after
29Lavoisier and Combustion
If metal-calx gained mass something must have
lost mass
Must be the air ? partial vacuum must exist
Opened flask ? air rushed in
30Lavoisiers Explanations
Ores metal and gas ? heating with charcoal
releases gas forming CO2 leaving metal
Isnt this what Stahl said about phlogiston?
Lavoisiers gas-transfer theory fits weight
changes with combustion
31Lavoisiers Explanations
Wood burns through addition of air, but doesnt
gain weight?
CO2 formed a gas which vanishes into air
If burned wood in closed container ? ash
vapors formed air original wood air
32Lavoisiers Burning Lens
33Conservation of Mass
- Lavoisier states mass never created nor destroyed
but shifted from one substance to another
34Lavoisier and Oxygen Theory (Part I)
- Heated 4 ounces of mercury in a flask with 50
cubic inches of air - 8 cubic inches of air used up (weighing 3 grains)
- remaining mercury and red powder on surface of
mercury were 3 grains heavier - new air in flask could not support life or
burning
35Lavoisier and Oxygen Theory (Part I)
- Removed all the red powder and heated it in
another flask - new gas produced volume 8 cubic inches and
weight of 3 grains - Originally ? 8 cubic inches of air used up
(weighing 3 grains) - new gas supported life and burning
- substances burned in it produced acids therefore
oxygen acid producer (Greek)
36Test of Phlogiston vs.Oxygen Theories
Phenomena under investigation
combustion
specifically combustion of mercury
37Test of Phlogiston vs.Oxygen Theories
Mercury is heated
- Model 1 Phlogiston Theory
phlogiston is given off when mercury is heated
38Test of Phlogiston vs.Oxygen Theories
Predictions under Phlogiston Model
Water Level?
water level under bell jar should go up / down
Why?
Phlogiston added to air
Weight?
mercury/ash should weight more / less than
original mercury
Why?
Phlogiston driven out
39Test of Phlogiston vs.Oxygen Theories
Mercury is heated
oxygen is taken up when mercury is heated
40Test of Phlogiston vs.Oxygen Theories
Predictions under Oxygen Model
Water Level?
water level under bell jar should go up / down
Why?
Oxygen taken up from air
Weight?
mercury/ash should weight more / less than
original mercury
Why?
Oxygen taken up from air
41Test of Phlogiston Theory
Data
water level under bell jar went up
mercury/ash combination weighed more than
original mercury
42Test of Phlogiston Theory
Data and prediction disagree with phlogiston
theory
Data and prediction agree with oxygen theory
Phlogiston model fails to support combustion of
mercury in this experiment
oxygen model supports combustion of mercury in
this experiment
43What is air?
- Cavendish
- ? 79.167 phlogisticated air
- ? 20.833 dephlogisticated air
- "...whether there are not in reality many
different substances confounded together by us
under the name of phlogisticated air" - Blacks Fixed Air??
- Lord Rayleigh (100 years later) established a
third gas to be argon
44What is air?
Air mixture of two gases in 1 to 4 ratio
(Lavoisier)
One-fifth was Priestleys dephlogisticated air
- Combined with burning or rusting materials
- Transferred from ore to charcoal
- Essential to life
Remaining four-fifths could not support life ?
azote (Greek meaning no life)
Today
0.9 argon
78 nitrogen
21 oxygen
0.04 carbon dioxide
45Oxygen and Life
Lavoisier life supported by process like
combustion
Breath in air high in O2 but out high in CO2
Measurements dont fit ? some O2 must combine
with Cavendishs hydrogen to make water
46The idea of an element
- Ancients ? elements fundamental types of matter
- Small number of elements ? unification yield
more complete and powerful explanation - Ancient Greeks ? four Earthly elements and aether
in the celestial sphere - Alchemists added the principles of sulfur and
mercury to explain the nature of metals -
Paracelsus later added salt - These systems of elements or principles persisted
into 1700s
47The idea of an element - Boyle
- In The Sceptical Chymist ? gold behaves
chemically as would expect an element to behave - Gold can be chemical combined with other
materials, then separated out again into its
pure form - Gold has consistent properties - same density,
color, malleability, etc - No attempt to identify other materials satisfying
the criteria he gave ?did not develop a system of
elements
48The idea of an element
- Lavoisier did develop such a system of elements
- Many of Lavoisiers elements well known in the
time of Boyle and Newton - Discovery of various airs instrumental for
Lavoisier - trying to make sense of these new observations
- idea of oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen as
elements - hypothesis water is not an element but composed
of the elements hydrogen and oxygen
49The idea of an element - Lavoisier
- Altered definition of an element and criteria to
identify elements - Boyle and Newton - retained ancient idea of
elements as a small number of truly fundamental
types of matter - Lavoisier ? all we dare venture to affirm of any
substance is, that it must be considered as
simple in the present state of our knowledge, and
so far as chemical analysis has hitherto been
able to show. - Table of Simple Substances
- - not eternal unchanging list of elements
- - best list given the current state of chemical
knowledge - - contained 33 elements
- - no pretense of high degree of unification
50New Chemical Nomenclature
- Collaboration of Lavoisier and 3 other French
chemists
- Helped publicize the new anti-phlogistic
chemistry
51Lavoisiers Textbook
Modern definition of element
Light and caloric
Law of conservation of mass