AGRICULTURE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

AGRICULTURE

Description:

... unlike India, had no food deficit ... implication on livestock production ... of monocultures - intensive and extensive mechanization ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:279
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: test502
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AGRICULTURE


1
  • AGRICULTURE

2
Outline
  • Preliminaries
  • Landmarks in development of agriculture
  • 3. Forms of agriculture.
  • 4. State of global food prospect
  • 5. Context of current state of agriculture
    Trapped in non-improvement mode?
  • 6. Environmental sources of agricultural stress?
  • 7. Agricultural sources of environmental
    degradation
  • 8. Towards an Agricultural-Environmental
    Realignment
  • 9. Conclusion.

3
1. preliminaries
  • Issues in agriculture -food security scarcity
    and shortage deprivation and famine-Agricultu
    re-environment interface. - Puzzle
  • - Challenge
  • - Way out?- Is the Green/biotech Revolution
    good for the Environment?

4
  • 2. Landmarks in development of agriculture
  • a) Domestication of seeds
  • - Soyabean domesticated in China about 5,000
    years ago
  • introduced to U.S. 1804.
  • b) Irrigated agric.
  • - Euphrates and Tigris, over 6000 years ago.
  • - Other variants known all over the world.
  • c) Genetic manipulation
  • 1847 Chemical fertilizer, discovered Germany
    that
  • nutrients removed from soil by plants could be
    replaced in
  • chemical form.
  • - 1935 Japanese Norin wheat released in Japan,
    and brought to the
  • US in 1946 and cross bred with American seeds.
  • - 1940s US govt, Foundations set up a plant
  • breeding program in Mexico.

5
Landmarks cont.
  • - 1944 the program thro Norman Borlaugh bred
    dwarf varieties of wheat (1954). 1970, Borlaugh
    awared Nobel Peace Prize for developing Miracle
    Seeds
  • - 1956 International Maize and Wheat Improvement
    Center, set up by Rockefeller and Mexican Govt
    was diffusing seeds to developing countries
  • - 1960 Impact of Mexico Rockefeller and Ford
    Foundations set up in Philippines International
    Rice Research Institute IRRI.
  • -1966 IRRI was producing dwarf rice.
  • Era of Green Revolution in some developing
    countries

6
3. Forms of agriculture
  • 1) Traditional
  • -Shifting cultivation
  • - Labor-intensive agric.
  • 2) Modern
  • - Mechanized agriculture
  • Characteristics of modern agriculture cf. to
    traditional agriculture
  • - intensive use of artificial fertilizers
  • - extensive practice of monocultures
  • - intensive and extensive mechanization
  • Biotechnology
  • - Focus develop seeds tolerant to herbicide
    resistance to
  • insect and disease.
  • - dogged by controversy

7
4. State of global food prospect
  • Grain harvesting previously rising, now falling
  • - World production nearly tripled from 1950 to
    mid 1990s.
  • By 2003, world grain stocks dropped to lowest
    level in 30 yrs.downtrend be norm?
  • E.gs.
  • - Chinas massive decline in grain production
    between 1998 and 2004, leading to import of 8
    million tons.
  • - 1960s, African, unlike India, had no food
    deficit today,
  • food scarcity reins cf. Zimbabwe

8
5. Context of current state of agriculture
Trapped in non-improvement mode?.
  • Where are we? Shrinking opportunities assuming
    this is a fair interpretation of grain
    production decline
  • a) Land Quality and acreage under crop
  • i) quality
  • Past solved through opening new frontiers
  • Today This option is limited Brazil?
  • - but environmental concerns loom large.
  • ii) acreage under crop
  • Past increased through irrigation
  • Today, aquifers used up, and any further demand
    will only
  • deplete, meaning more drop in food production.

9
5. Context of current state of agriculture cont.
  • b) Crop yields
  • Past mitigated through increased use of
    fertilizer.
  • 1950-1989 14m tons -146m.
  • Today use of more fertilizer has little effect.
  • - Also fertilizer use declining.
  • c) Science and Technology
  • Past spurred grain production, both acreage and
    yields/acre.
  • Today biotech may do it, but it is under attack
  • Convergence of dual attacks
  • i) Environmental and Ideological.
  • - Environmentally counter-productive human
    health and biodiversity
  • - Ideologically - political-economy questions
    future of
  • seeds monopolized by a few corporations.
  • ii) Combined forces in developed and developing
    countries
  • Before, it was developed vs. developing

10
6. Environmental sources of agricultural stress?
  • 1) Temp. rises undermining food productivity
  • -1 degree Celsius rise in temp. leads to 10
    decline in wheat, rice, and corn yields.
  • e.g.- 2003 European heat Eastern Europe
    harvested smallest wheat crop in 30 yrs.
    Imports.
  • - Sahel is an over-told story
  • - But, new frontiers? Russia Canada.
  • - How do temp. affect food production?
  • i) Worlds fresh water stored in ice and snow in
    mountainous regions.
  • E.g. smelting snowfields reported in Himalayas,
    Kilimanjaro and Mt. Kenya
  • ii) worsen or create new crop disease and insect
    problems.

11
6. Environmental sources of agricultural stress?
Cont.
  • 2) Falling water tables
  • - Impact of irrigation
  • -many countries affected, including a
    combination of those accounting for about half of
    global grain harvest China, India, US.
  • Eg.
  • Saudi Arabia used aquifer for irrigation and
    wheat production rose from 140,000 tons (1980) to
    4.1 million tons (1992).
  • - By 2004, aquifer had depleted and production
    dropped to 1.6 million tons.
  • - Irrigated wheat production threatened.

12
6. Environmental sources of agricultural stress?
Cont.
  • 3) Soil erosion and desertification effect on
    land productivity over time
  • - Wind and water erosion mismanaged
    agricultural activities? reduces fertility of
    cropland, hence less yields.
  • - Desertification in Africa and Asia.
  • Eg.
  • In China, some deserts about to merge
  • - parts of northern and western regions.
  • 4) Second order Impacts of Environmental
    degradation
  • i) Collapsing fisheries vs. implication on
    livestock production.
  • ii) Shrinking forests implications for both
    wind and water erosion, hence unsustainable
    agricultural and grazing opportunities, leading
    to more erosion global warming.
  • iii) Disappearing species biodiversity

13
7. Agricultural sources of environmental
degradation
  • 1) Loss of vegetation cover - Soil erosion
  • -overgrazing or cultivation in marginal lands.
    Plowing steep sloping land if not protected
    by terraces, or perennial crops, etc.
  • - Heavy rains or too dry conditions .
  • - vulnerability to both water and wind erosion.
  • Egs
  • - Problem of Africas rangelands ASALS
  • - 1930s Dust Bowl in U.S.
  • Russias Virgin Lands Project, 1954 and 1960.
  • - a short success, then dust bowl.

14
7. Agricultural sources of environmental
degradation
  • 2) collapse and even commercialization? of
    agric.
  • - trigger pressures on forests, wetlands.
  • - Eg. of Brazil?
  • Fears of soil erosion in areas where large scale
    vegetation clearing is taking place cerrado-
    Soyabean cultivation.
  • -Forest clearing could jeopardize rainfall
    patterns
  • - plus carbon sequestration impaired.
  • - Loss of species global centre of
    biodiversity, some endemic esp. in cerrado

15
7. Agricultural sources of environmental
degradation cont.
  • 3) Modernization of Agriculture Genetic
    engineering and environment-- bane or boon?
  • - combine both Green Revolution GR and
    GMOs.
  • - Question of success of Green Revolution can be
    conceptualized at two levels
  • a) Was meant to create abundance, did it?
  • b) Unintended consequences disastrous
    environmental impacts?
  • Conceptualized contentious claims
  • - competing epistemologies
  • could the effects i.e. b occur under
    circumstances absent of modernization of
    agriculture, and two, what is the trade-off?

16
7. Agricultural sources of environmental
degradation cont.
  • 3 i) Critics
  • Contribution to pest vulnerability
  • pesticides enhance evolution
  • of resistant pest strains
  • b) Destruction of diversity
  • Homogenization of marginal lands and croplands
    destroys genetic diversity.
  • Potential effects on nontarget organisms
  • Direct effects adverse effects on nontarget
    organisms
  • Indirect effects biomagnifications
  • - in theory, can mean local extinction of some
    animals.

17
7. Agricultural sources of environmental
degradation cont.
  • c) Destruction of soil fertility
  • -Soil toxicity thro GR by introducing excess
    quantities of trace elements in the ecosystems.
  • Have to always use fertilizers
  • d) Greenhouse effect
  • - Nitrogen-based fertilizers release nitrous
    oxide to the atmosphere, causing global warming.
  • cropping patterns lead to erosion and degradation
    of land.
  • - Croplands are kept under constantly soil
    depleting crops like wheat and rice no rotation
    with soil building crops --legumes.

18
7. Agricultural sources of environmental
degradation cont.
  • 3 ii) Alternative/Competing explanations
  • a) In 2000, for example, the U.S. National
    Academy of Sciences committee on Genetically
    Modified Pest-Protected Plants submitted that
  • Health and ecological risk assessments of
    transgenic pest
  • protected plants do not differ in principle from
    the
  • assessment of other health and ecological risks.
  • b) On loss of biodiversity, the NAS committee
    (2000) found that
  • these potential impacts on nontarget organisms
    are generally expected to be smaller than the
    impacts of broad-spectrum synthetic insecticides,
    and therefore, the use of pest-protected plants
    could lead to greater biodiversity in
    agroecosystems where they replace the use of
    those insecticides.

19
8. Towards an Agricultural-Environmental
RealignmentMitigation
  • Two considerations
  • Question is how do we minimize additional
    demands on land and water resources and avoid
    damage to natural systems in responding to the
    imperatives of agric. production?
  • ii) What/where is the problem?
  • - Given that land is a private asset, why should
    farmers then fail to control degradation of soil?
    Is it that they dont know information or they
    dont care/mind incentives?

20
8. Towards an Agricultural-Environmental
RealignmentMitigation
  • Activities that constrain adverse effects of
    agriculture.
  • Conversion of ruminants into animal protein
    second harvest effects milk, fish and beef
  • -industries built on roughage --- wheat and rice
    straw, corn stalks, and grass from roadside.
  • Egs.
  • - Indias milk industry
  • - Chinas Beef Belt and aquacultural sector

21
8. Towards an Agricultural-Environmental
RealignmentMitigation
  • 1. Activities that constrain adverse effects of
    agriculture cont.
  • b) Multiple croppingmore than one crop on a
    field per year.
  • - already declining Japan, South Korea, Taiwan,
    and China
  • c) Raise water productivity
  • -build small water-harvesting ponds to capture
    rainfall runoff and help recharge underground
    aquifers Africa.
  • d) Sustainable agriculture and contain
    post-harvest loss contrast Brazil and Machakos
  • - Africa due to storage infrastructure.
  • -On new frontiers?
  • Crisis posed by Brazil Amazon and cerrado
  • - Organic farming?

22
8. Towards an Agricultural-Environmental
RealignmentMitigation
  • 2) Active use of agriculture to improve the
    environment
  • market incentives
  • Egs.
  • Starbucks, Conservation International and coffee
    farmers.
  • b) State policies on both agriculture and
    environment
  • i) Intervention in market question is how to
    interveneStarbuck and CI model, or ?
  • 1) remove subsidies on inputs, while taxing
    those injuring environment for Green tax?
  • If policies subsidize farm inputs equipment,
    fertilizers, or pesticides
  • - leads to inefficient and unsustainable use of
    fertilizers.

23
8. Towards an Agricultural-Environmental
RealignmentMitigation
  • i) Intervention in market cont.
  • Egs.
  • - Europe Denmark and Sweden on chemical
    reduction targets input taxes to provide
    incentives to use fewer agricultural chemicals
  • Developing countries tricky
  • - To farmers subsidies necessities.
  • Maize farmer Francis Kimosop Kimetto complains
    about the costs of inputs
  • If fertiliser remains this expensive, farmers
    will
  • revert to the traditional cow dung, which will
    reduce the
  • yield, (and) We want a minister who will solve
    our
  • problems, says Francis Rono, a wheat farmer in
    Kitale in
  • the North Rift Valley.

24
Intervention in market cont.
  • 2) On guaranteed prices for outputs
  • - combined with 1 above, increase profitability
    of agriculture, thus motivating inefficient
    practices like opening up inappropriate land for
    cultivation.
  • - liberalize market?
  • c) Make conservation a paying venture? pay
    farmers for producing public goods
  • - subsidize soil erosion control measures
    incentives.
  • Egs.
  • -1985 U.S. Conservation Reserve Program
  • - Agroforestry in Africa?
  • - With respect to conversion of forests and
    grasslands into farming -erosion
  • - Forest farms as CPR - management

25
Conclusion.
  • Food production imperatives can impact on
    environment.
  • Hence, failure to have agricultural regime that
    guarantees affordable food will imply a
    declaration of war on the earths ecosystem
    people eking for a living speculators.
  • However, answer to the agricultural-environmental
    conundrum lay outside the two sectors.
  • - largely a question of how information
    interacts with incentives.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com