Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg

Description:

Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg –

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: lettiag
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg


1
Spatial and temporal patterns in food web
accumulation of Hg
  • Project Update
  • RMP Exposure and Effects Work Group
  • May 12, 2008

2
Workplan Specific questions to address
  • Where is mercury entering the Bay food web?
  • What habitats, conditions, or factors help to
    identify hotspots of food web accumulation in Bay
    margins?
  • Are there interannual trends in MeHg
    bioaccumulation resulting from wetland and margin
    restoration activities?
  • What are the best biomonitoring tools for
    characterizing hotspots of MeHg bioaccumulation?

3
General approach
  • Spatial analysis
  • Stratified random design
  • Identify hotspots based on conceptual model
  • Seasonal trend evaluation
  • Interannual trend detection
  • Field sampling for Hg isotopes and for DGT study

4
Allocation of effort
  • Total of 62 sampling events per year to evaluate
    spatial, seasonal, and interannual patterns

5
Spatial survey design - hypothesis testing
Draft data do not cite or quote
6
Spatial survey sites chosen probabilistically
  • Same GRTS method as Status and Trends Program
  • What types of conditions Bay-wide higher
    Hg
  • Stratified sampling scheme
  • Even if all our hypotheses are wrong, we are
    still characterizing conditions and identifying
    hotspots Bay-wide

Draft data do not cite or quote
7
How separating different site types?
8
Map of areas to be sampled
  • GIS based on morphology, size, depth
  • Strata 1
  • Open Shorelines
  • -Strata 2
  • Enclosed areas and creeks

Draft data do not cite or quote
9
Identifying Hg source areas
10
Source site selection
  • Mining sources
  • Creeks draining probable source mines
  • POTW discharges
  • Feedback from RB NPDES Permitting Staff
  • Creeks draining urban/industrial areas
  • Feedback from BASMAA
  • Industrial areas with high sediment THg
  • Total of about 50 sites

11
Wetland site selection
12
Wetland site selection
  • Oversight by Josh Collins and Letitia Grenier
  • Based on GRTS sampling performed for SBMP and
    CRAM
  • Stratified based on
  • relative wetland elevation and age
  • Is wetland hypothesized to be high or low in
    bioavailable Hg

Draft data do not cite or quote
13
Results of site selection
14
Non-wetland site selection Years 1 - 3
Draft data do not cite or quote
15
Wetland site selection Years 1-3
Draft data do not cite or quote
16
Source site selection Years 1-3
Draft data do not cite or quote
17
All sites Year One
Draft data do not cite or quote
18
Source Sites Year One
Draft data do not cite or quote
19
Enclosed vs. Open shoreline Year One
Draft data do not cite or quote
20
All sites Year Two (does not include wetlands)
Draft data do not cite or quote
21
Coordination and Collaboration
  • University of Michigan RMP Hg stable isotope
    study (Joel Blum, Gretchen Gehrke)
  • Hg isotope sites characterize specific sources
  • Urban runoff, mining, waste water, atmospheric
    deposition
  • Sites will be chosen from small fish source sites
    after probabilistic site selection is complete
  • Sediment Hg and isotope analysis

22
Coordination and Collaboration
  • Trent University Diffusive Gradient in Thinfilm
    devices (Holger Hintelmann)
  • Just completing analyses of the pilot study data
    (2007)
  • Year 1 - validation
  • 15 small fish sites varying in chemistry and
    expected bioaccumulation
  • Will overlap with mercury isotope sites
  • Year 2 process studies
  • Source sites of interest including fishless
    locations
  • Gradient studies
  • Likely include SPL sites (e.g., Z4LA)
  • Report available February 2010
  • Addition of water column DOC as correlate

23
Discussion points
  • How select sites for DGT and Hg isotope in year
    one

24
END OF TALK
  • REST IS ANCILLARY MATERIAL IN EVENT OF DISCUSSION

25
Draft data do not cite or quote
26
Draft data do not cite or quote
27
Sediment MeHg may be correlated with topsmelt Hg
  • Topsmelt 2006 data
  • RMP and Calfed
  • sediment data within 1.5 km disk of fish
  • R2 0.61

28
Trend analysis a multiple station BACI design
Draft data do not cite or quote
29
Trend Sampling Locations
Hamilton
Benicia Park
China Camp
Control
Point Isabel
Impact (Restoration)
Oakland Middle Harbor
Candlestick Point
Eden Landing
Bird Island/ Steinberger Slough
Newark Slough
Alviso Slough
Draft data do not cite or quote
30
Trend Sampling Locations
Hamilton
Benicia Park
China Camp
Control
Point Isabel
Impact (Restoration)
Oakland Middle Harbor
Candlestick Point
Eden Landing
Bird Island/ Steinberger Slough
Newark Slough
Alviso Slough
Draft data do not cite or quote
31
Monthly sampling locations
Additional North Bay Station Sampled by USFWS
Martin Luther King Shoreline
Draft data do not cite or quote
32
MLK Shoreline Location
Draft data do not cite or quote
33
Collection of additional parameters
  • Aimed at better understanding mechanisms for
    spatial variation in bioavailable Hg
  • GIS spatial parameters
  • Sediment parameters

34
Sediment parameters
  • Sediment parameters redox, TON, grain size,
    total and methyl Hg
  • Samples at subset of 20 Sites

35
Sediment MeHg lt 1 ng/g 1 2 ng/g
gt 2 ng/g
36
Annual monitoring of trend stations
37
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com