Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg

Description:

Sub-Embayment. Open Shoreline. Hydrology: Site Type. Preliminary map of areas to be sampled ... Embayment. Open Water. Hydrology: Site Type. Wetland site selection ... –

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: lettiag
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spatial and temporal patterns in food web accumulation of Hg


1
Spatial and temporal patterns in food web
accumulation of Hg
  • Project Update
  • RMP Technical Review Committee March 18, 2008

2
Workplan Specific questions to address
  • Where is mercury entering the Bay food web?
  • What habitats, conditions, or factors help to
    identify hotspots of food web accumulation in Bay
    margins?
  • Are there interannual trends in MeHg
    bioaccumulation resulting from wetland and margin
    restoration activities?
  • What are the best biomonitoring tools for
    characterizing hotspots of MeHg bioaccumulation?

3
General approach
  • Spatial analysis
  • Stratified random design
  • Identify hotspots based on conceptual model
  • Seasonal trend evaluation
  • Interannual trend detection
  • Field sampling for Hg isotopes and for DGT study

4
Allocation of effort
  • Total of 70 sampling events per year to evaluate
    spatial, seasonal, and interannual patterns

5
Spatial survey
  • Test hypotheses of MeHg entry points and food web
    accumulation hotspots
  • Hg source sites
  • Wetlands and wetland type
  • Enclosed subembayments and estuarine creeks
  • Sediment parameters

6
Spatial survey design - hypothesis testing
7
Spatial survey sites chosen probabilistically
  • Same GRTS method as Status and Trends Program
  • More powerful inference than with sites of
    convenience
  • What types of conditions Bay-wide higher
    Hg
  • Identify spatial gradients (e.g., South/North?)
  • Even if all our hypotheses are wrong, we are
    still characterizing conditions and identifying
    hotspots Bay-wide

8
So What Are the Areas Sampled?
  • Entire shoreline of Bay
  • Lower South Bay to Suisun Bay
  • Estuarine tributaries
  • All subtidal wetlands
  • Not sampling
  • Offshore locations
  • Salt ponds (weak connection to Bay)
  • Marine lakes (e.g., Aquatic Park, Anza Lagoon)
  • Islands within Bay (e.g., Angel Island, Red Rock)

9
How separating different site types?
10
Preliminary map of areas to be sampled
  • GIS based on morphology, size, depth
  • Strata 1
  • Open Shorelines
  • -Strata 2
  • Submbayments

11
Identifying Hg source areas
12
Source site selection
  • Mining sources
  • Creeks draining La Joya, Bella Oaks, Borges, and
    New Almaden Mines
  • POTW discharges
  • 11 shallow-water wastewater treatment plants
    recommended by RB NPDES Permitting Staff
  • Creeks draining urban/industrial areas
  • Identified for part of Bay by Prop 13 Stormwater
    BMP project
  • Based on historic industrial area and railway
    lines, auto recycling facilities, and Hg hotspots
  • Industrial areas with high sediment THg
  • BPTCP sites having sediment THg gt 0.7 ppm
  • Total of about 50 sites

13
Wetland site selection
14
Wetland site selection
  • Oversight by Josh Collins and Letitia Grenier
  • Based on GRTS sampling performed for SBMP and
    CRAM
  • Stratified based on relative wetland elevation
    and age

15
Coordination and Collaboration
  • University of Michigan RMP Hg stable isotope
    study (Joel Blum, Gretchen Gehrke)
  • Hg isotope sites characterize specific sources
  • Urban runoff, mining, waste water, atmospheric
    deposition
  • Sites will be chosen from small fish source sites
    after probabilistic site selection is complete
  • Augment with small number additional sites (e.g.,
    Guadalupe Reservoir to represent mine signal)
  • Sediment Hg and isotope analysis

16
Coordination and Collaboration
  • Trent University Diffusive Gradient in Thinfilm
    devices (Holger Hintelmann)
  • Just completing analyses of the pilot study data
    (2007)
  • Year 1 - validation
  • 15 small fish sites varying in chemistry and
    expected bioaccumulation
  • Likely overlap with mercury isotope sites
  • Year 2 process studies
  • Source sites of interest including fishless
    locations
  • Likely include SPL sites (e.g., Z4LA)
  • Report available February 2010
  • Addition of water column DOC as correlate

17
Discussion points
  • Other suggested source sites?
  • Agree with area and types of sites covered?
  • Entire shoreline of Bay
  • Lower South Bay to Suisun Bay
  • Estuarine tributaries
  • All subtidal wetlands
  • Not salt ponds, marine lakes, offshore, or small
    islands
  • Phased plan for DGT study

18
END OF TALK
  • REST IS ANCILLARY MATERIAL IN EVENT OF DISCUSSION

19
(No Transcript)
20
Sediment MeHg may be correlated with topsmelt Hg
  • Topsmelt 2006 data
  • RMP and Calfed
  • sediment data within 1.5 km disk of fish
  • R2 0.61

21
Trend analysis a multiple station BACI design
22
Trend Sampling Locations
Hamilton
Benicia Park
China Camp
Control
Point Isabel
Impact (Restoration)
Oakland Middle Harbor
Candlestick Point
Eden Landing
Bird Island/ Steinberger Slough
Newark Slough
Alviso Slough
23
Trend Sampling Locations
Hamilton
Benicia Park
China Camp
Control
Point Isabel
Impact (Restoration)
Oakland Middle Harbor
Candlestick Point
Eden Landing
Bird Island/ Steinberger Slough
Newark Slough
Alviso Slough
24
Monthly sampling locations
Additional North Bay Station Sampled by USFWS
Martin Luther King Shoreline
25
MLK Shoreline Location
26
Collection of additional parameters
  • Aimed at better understanding mechanisms for
    spatial variation in bioavailable Hg
  • GIS spatial parameters
  • Sediment parameters

27
Sediment parameters
  • Sediment parameters redox, TON, grain size,
    total and methyl Hg
  • Samples at subset of 20 Sites

28
Sediment MeHg lt 1 ng/g 1 2 ng/g
gt 2 ng/g
29
Annual monitoring of trend stations
30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com