Jonay Isa Gonzlez Hernndez - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Jonay Isa Gonzlez Hernndez

Description:

Cosmological Impact of the First Stars (CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team)? Outline ... (CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team)? 3D Model: Metallicity dependence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Jon49
Category:
Tags: curie | gonzlez | hernndez | isa | jonay

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jonay Isa Gonzlez Hernndez


1
Galactic chemical evolution of oxygen in the
light of 3D stellar atmospheres
  • Jonay Isaí González Hernández
  • Observatoire de Paris-Meudon (GEPI)?
  • Cosmological Impact of the First Stars
  • (CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team)?

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Grid of 3D models
  • Observations
  • Analysis
  • Preliminary results
  • Conclussions

3
Oxygen
  • The most abundant element
  • after H and He
  • Produced during
  • hydrostatic and
  • explosive
  • nucleosynthesis
  • in massive stars

Tominaga et al. (2007)?
4
Oxygen
  • Its abundance is determined by
  • - Forbidden lines OI 6300 and 6363 A
  • - permitted near-IR triplet OI 7772-5 A
  • - near-IR vibration-rotation bands
  • - near-UV electronic transition bands

5
Oxygen in the Sun 3D
  • Previous abundance determination
  • log N(O)/N(H)128.66 (Asplund et al. 2005)?
  • New abundance determination
  • log N(O)/N(H)128.76 (Caffau et al. 2008)?

6
Oxygen problem OI
Cayrel et al. (2004)?
  • Each O abundance indicator provides a
  • different abundance trend O vs. Fe
  • OI shows a quasi-plateau with
  • O/Fe0.4-0.5 in subgiants and giants
  • (García Pérez et al. 2006 Cayrel et al.
    2004)?
  • in the metallicity range -1.5 lt Fe/H lt -3.5
  • However, from OI, Nissen et al. (2002)
  • showed a linear increase O/Fe vs Fe/H in
  • dwarfs in the range -0.5 lt Fe/H lt -2.5

Nissen et al. (2002)?
García Pérez et al. (2006)?
7
Oxygen problem OI
  • Near-IR OI triplet shows a linear steep
  • increase O/Fe towards lower Fe/H
  • (Israelian et al. 2001 Boesgaard et al 1999
  • Nissen et al. 2002 Fulbright Johnson
  • 2003) for dwarfs, subgiants and giants for
  • -0.8 lt Fe/H lt -3.2
  • Fulbright Johnson (2003) found a
  • disagreement of 0.4 dex between OI triplet
  • and OI

Israelian et al. (2001)?
8
Oxygen problem OH
  • Near-UV OH shows also a linear steep
  • increase of O/Fe towards lower Fe/H
  • (Israelian et al. 2001 Boesgaard et al 1999)?
  • for dwarfs with -0.8 lt Fe/H lt -3.4
  • However, García Pérez et al. (2006) claimed
  • a plateau of O/Fe0.5 for subgiants with
  • -1.5 lt Fe/H lt -3.

García Pérez et al. (2006)?
9
Oxygen problem
  • It is clear that this disagreement should
  • be related to the limitations of the
  • analysis employed
  • The deviations from NLTE and the effects
  • of granulation and temperature
  • inhomogeneities (3D effects) may help
  • to solve this discrepancy

10
Oxygen in metal-poor stars 1D
O/Fe
Fulbright Johnson (2003)?
Fe/H
11
Oxygen in metal-poor starsNLTE and 3D effects
  • OI is not sensitive to NLTE effects but
  • is slightly affected by 3D inhomogeneities
  • OI triplet is significantly dependent on
  • NLTE effects
  • Near-UV OH are strongly sensitive to
  • 3D effects and maybe slightly dependent
  • on NLTE although in the opposite direction

12
Abundance trends Oxygen 3D
O/Fe
The most metal-poor spectroscopic binary dwarfs
CS22876-032 (Fe/H-3.7) González Hernández et
al. (2008)?
1D
dwarfs
3D
FeI/H
13
3D model atmospheres
  • 3D atmospheric models
  • are computed with
  • CO5BOLD (Wedemeyer et
  • al. 2003)?
  • Representative selection of
  • snapshots of the stellar
  • photosphere
  • Spectral synthesis code
  • Linfor3D

14
Abundance corrections
  • 3D - lt3Dgt corrections
  • - lt3Dgt model temporal and
  • horizontal average of the 3D model
  • - Same micro-physics with vturb fixed
  • 3D 1D corrections
  • - Lagrangian hydrostatic 1D model
  • - Same micro-physics with vturb fixed

15
Model Atmospheres 3D
3D
  • 3D versus 1D

OH
1D
Fe
16
Model Atmospheres 3D
  • 3D versus lt3Dgt
  • lt3Dgt versus 1D

OH
Fe
17
3D model grid
18
3D Model gravity dependence
Fe/H-3
Teff5500 K
OH
Fe
19
3D Model Metallicity dependence
20
Observations
  • Spectroscopy with VLT/UVES
  • Spectral region 300.0-390.0 nm
  • ?/d? 43,000
  • S/N gt 100 at 312.0 nm

21
Stellar parameters
  • Teff from IRFM using 2MASS JHKs
  • log g from Hipparcos paralaxes

22
3D-1D abundance correctionTeff dependence
OH
23
3D-1D abundance correctionTeff dependence
Fe
24
3D-1D abundance correctionlog g dependence
OH
25
3D-1D abundance correctionexcitation potential
dependence
Fe
26
3D-1D abundance correctionexcitation potential
dependence
OH
27
1D O abundances
28
3D O abundances
29
Galactic oxygen evolution
Kobayashi et al. (2006)?
30
Conclusions and Future work
  • 3D models appear necessary in order to determine
    O abundances
  • from near-UV OH bands, mainly due to cooling
    effects that
  • metal-poor 3D models show
  • The abudance trend of O seems to show a
    quasi-linear increase
  • towards lower metallicity or at least two
    plateau, one at 0.5-0.6
  • dex and the other at 0.9-1 dex at the lower
    metallicities.
  • However, this might be considered with caution
    until 3D
  • corrections and NLTE effects are applied to O
    and Fe for different
  • abundance indicators in dwarfs, subgiants and
    giants

31
Galactic chemical evolution of oxygen in the
light of 3D stellar atmospheres
  • Jonay Isaí González Hernández
  • Observatoire de Paris-Meudon (GEPI)?
  • Cosmological Impact of the First Stars
  • (CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team)?

32
3D Model Metallicity dependence
33
Chemical Analysis
  • FeI and FeII abundances (6500K) 1D

FeI
FeII
FeI
FeII
34
Chemical Analysis
  • FeI and FeII abundances (6500) lt3Dgt

FeI
FeII
FeI
FeII
35
Abundance trends Oxygen 1D
O/FeI
OH
dwarfs
3D
3D
FeI/H
36
Abundance trends Oxygen 3D
O/Fe
dwarfs
FeI/H
37
Abundance trends Oxygen 3D
O/Fe
OI
giants
subgiants
dwarfs
FeI/H
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com