FDA ACM PowerPoint Template

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

FDA ACM PowerPoint Template

Description:

Concomitant or very recent use of. Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. CYP3A4 inducers ... Concomitant Emetogenic Chemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide and/or Doxorubicin) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: leew152

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FDA ACM PowerPoint Template


1
(No Transcript)
2
Key Anti-emetic Milestones
3
(No Transcript)
4
Delayed emesis randomized trialDouble-blind
trial with cisplatin (120 mg/m2)
All patients received i.v. metoclopramide,
dexamethasone, and lorazepam day 1
Kris et al, J Clin Oncol 1989 7 108
5
Delayed emesis randomized trial Multi-center
trial with 322 patients receiving cisplatin
All patients received ondansetron 8 mg i.v. and
dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. day 1 for acute emesis
Italian Group, J Clin Oncol 1997 15 124
6
Incidence of emesis Perception vs
realityModerately emetogenic chemotherapy
All patients received 5HT3 antagonist 84 also
received steroid
Grunberg et al, Proc ASCO 2002 22 996
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Aprepitant Blocks Brain NK1 Receptorsin Humans
Mean ( SD) Plasma Trough Concentrations of the
Aprepitant 3-Day Regimen
Binding of PET tracer to NK1 receptors prior to
aprepitant dosing
Brain NK1 Receptor Occupancy ()
Blockade of NK1 receptorsafter aprepitant dosing
Aprepitant Plasma Trough Concentration (ng/mL)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Aprepitant Protects Against Chemotherapy-Induced
Emesis in Ferrets
Aprepitant(1 mg/kg/day)
Aprepitant(2 mg/kg/day)
Vehicle
300
240
180
Retches and Vomits
120
60
0
0
24
48
72
Cisplatin
Profile similar to humans (acute delayed phases)
Acute delayed effects blocked by aprepitant
20
(No Transcript)
21
Aprepitant
  • Does aprepitant work alone as an antiemetic?
  • Is a regimen including aprepitant more effective
    than current standard therapy?
  • What is the optimum aprepitant dose?
  • Confirm that the Phase III aprepitant regimen is
    safe and effective.

22
Key Elements of the Clinical Trials
  • All studies double-blind versus appropriate
    control
  • All patients cisplatin näive
  • All patients to receive high dose cisplatin
  • ?70 mg/m2 infused over ?3 hours on Day 1
  • Additional emetogenic chemotherapy permitted on
    Day 1
  • Randomization stratified
  • Gender
  • Additional emetogenic chemotherapy
  • Rescue therapy allowed for established nausea
    or vomiting

23
Key Elements of the Clinical Trials
  • Daily patient diary
  • All emetic events
  • All use of rescue therapy
  • Nausea assessments
  • Primary efficacy assessments
  • Initial cycle of cisplatin chemotherapy
  • Modified intention-to-treat population

24
Efficacy Endpoints
  • Primary endpoint
  • Complete Response No emesis and no rescue
  • Reflects control of both emesis and nausea
  • Primary endpoint in ondansetron and dolasetron
    development programs
  • Other key endpoints
  • Frequency of emetic events
  • Use of rescue therapy
  • Nausea
  • Impact of nausea and vomiting on daily life

25
Aprepitant
  • Does aprepitant work alone as an antiemetic?
  • Is a regimen including aprepitant more effective
    than current standard therapy?
  • What is the optimum aprepitant dose?
  • Confirm that the Phase III aprepitant regimen is
    safe and effective.

26
Aprepitant as Monotherapy
Protocol 004
Day 1
Aprepitant I.V. prodrug60 or 100 mg Ondansetron
I.V.32 mg
Eur J Cancer 37835-842, 2001
27
Aprepitant as Monotherapy
Complete Response Acute and Delayed Phases
Protocol 004
48
48
37
17
N
30
23
29
23
28
Aprepitant as Monotherapy
Complete Response Acute and Delayed Phases
Protocol 004
48
48
37
HistoricalData(Untreated)
17
N
30
23
29
23
Cancer 782193-2198, 1996
29
Aprepitant as Monotherapy
Conclusions
Protocol 004
  • Aprepitant is an effective antiemetic
  • In both acute and delayed phases
  • Distinctive efficacy profile relative to 5-HT3
    receptor antagonists
  • Significantly superior efficacy in delayed phase
  • Distinctive efficacy profile implied potential
    for better efficacy by combining with a 5-HT3
    receptor antagonist

30
Aprepitant
  • Does aprepitant work alone as an antiemetic?
  • Is a regimen including aprepitant more effective
    than current standard therapy?
  • What is the optimum aprepitant dose?
  • Confirm that the Phase III aprepitant regimen is
    safe and effective.

31
Aprepitant Regimen Study
Design Features
Protocol 007
  • Aprepitant loading dose strategy
  • Day 1 400 mg P.O.
  • Days 2-5 300 mg P.O.
  • Control regimen contains Standard Therapy
  • Day 1 only Granisetron 10 µg/kg I.V.
  • Dexamethasone 20 mg P.O.

32
Aprepitant Regimen Study
Primary Treatment Groups
Protocol 007
Group
Day 1
Days 2 to 5
G
D
A
A
Aprepitant 5-Day
400
300
Aprepitant 1-Day
P
400
Control
P
P
Ggranisetron Ddexamethasone Aaprepitant
Pplacebo
33
Aprepitant Regimen Study
Complete Response Acute and Delayed Phases
Protocol 007
83
77
Aprepitant 5-Day
Aprepitant 1-Day
57
52
Control
43
16
N
53
50
54
51
54
51
N Engl J Med 340 190-5 1999
34
Aprepitant Regimen Study
Conclusions
Protocol 007
  • Aprepitant enhances the efficacy of a Standard
    Therapy regimen
  • Acute and delayed nausea and vomiting
  • Aprepitant is more effective when administered
    for multiple days
  • Delayed nausea and vomiting
  • Even when a very high dose is administered on Day
    1

35
Aprepitant
  • Does aprepitant work alone as an antiemetic?
  • Is a regimen including aprepitant more effective
    than current standard therapy?
  • What is the optimum aprepitant dose?
  • Confirm that the Phase III aprepitant regimen is
    safe and effective.

36
Dose Finding Study
Time to First Emesis or Rescue
Protocol 040/042
37
Dose Finding Study
Time to First Emesis or Rescue
Protocol 040/042
38
Dose Finding Study
Conclusions
Protocol 040/042
  • Aprepitant 125/80 mg regimen is effective
  • 40/25 mg less effective
  • 375/250 mg adds no apparent benefit
  • Almost all initial therapy failures occur within
    72 hours
  • 3-day dosing likely to provide full benefit

Phase III aprepitant regimen125 mg on Day 1
followed by 80 mg on Days 2 and 3
39
Phase III Primary Hypothesis Cycle 1
  • Compared to Standard Therapy
  • The aprepitant regimen will provide superior
    control of nausea and vomiting as measured by the
    proportion of patients with an Overall Complete
    Response
  • No emesis and no rescue
  • In the 120 hours following the initiation of
    cisplatin

Two large multinational studies, both with
multiple cycle extensions,in patients receiving
high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy
40
Phase III Studies
Design Features
Protocols 052 and 054
  • Aprepitant regimen refinements
  • 3-day aprepitant dosing
  • Dexamethasone dose reduced to provide plasma
    exposure similar to control

41
Phase III Studies
Primary Treatment Groups
Protocols 052 and 054
Group
Day 4
Day 1
Days 2-3
O
D
A
D
D
A
8
12
8
Aprepitant
P
P
16
20
16
Control
Oondansetron Ddexamethasone Aaprepitant
Pplacebo
42
Phase III Studies
Design Features
Protocols 052 and 054
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Cisplatin dose ?70 mg/m2
  • Exclusion Criteria
  • Laboratory value parameters
  • AST or ALT ?2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Neutrophil count lt1500/mm3 and WBC lt3000/mm3
  • Bilirubin gt1.5 x ULN Creatinine gt1.5 x ULN
  • Concomitant or very recent use of
  • Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors
  • CYP3A4 inducers

43
Phase III Studies
Patient Demographics
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined
44
Phase III Studies
Primary Cancer Diagnoses
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined
Aprepitant (N549)
Control (N554)
45
Phase III Studies
Concomitant Chemotherapy
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined
46
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Primary Endpoint Overall Complete Response
Protocol 052
plt0.001
73
52
N
260
260
47
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Primary Endpoint Overall Complete Response
Protocol 054
Protocol 052
plt0.001
73
63
52
43
N
260
260
263
260
48
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Complete Response Acute and Delayed Phases
Protocol 052
Protocol 054
plt0.001
plt0.001
plt0.001
plt0.001
89
83
78
75
68
68
56
47
N
259
260
260
260
260
263
261
263
49
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Time to First Emesis or Rescue
APR N260 Control N260
APR N260 Control N263
50
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Components of Primary Endpoint Overall
Protocol 052
Protocol 054
plt0.01
plt0.01
plt0.01
plt0.01
82
81
78
73
71
66
55
45
N
260
260
260
263
260
260
260
263
51
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
No Nausea and No Significant Nausea Overall
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined
72
65
48
42
N
517
523
522
517
52
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Other Prespecified Endpoints
  • Complete Protection Complete Response No
    Significant Nausea
  • Aprepitant statistically superior in both
    protocols 052 and 054
  • Total Control Complete Response No Nausea
  • Aprepitant statistically superior in protocol 054
  • No Impact on Daily Life
  • Validated nausea- and vomiting-specific
    questionnaire
  • Aprepitant statistically superior in both
    protocols 052 and 054

53
Phase III Studies Cycle 1
Concomitant Emetogenic Chemotherapy
(Cyclophosphamide and/or Doxorubicin)
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined Overall(Post-hoc
Analysis)
plt0.001
Aprepitant (N70)
Control (N72)
59
26
54
Phase III Studies Cycle 1 Conclusions
  • Aprepitant highly effective in two replicate
    clinical trials
  • Overall 20 fewer patients vomited or required
    rescue medications for established nausea or
    emesis (plt0.001)
  • Superiority of aprepitant evident
  • In both acute and delayed phases
  • For both components of primary endpoint Emesis
    and use of rescue medications
  • In patients taking cisplatin plus other
    emetogenic chemotherapy (post-hoc analysis)
  • Consistent advantage for aprepitant regimen on
    nausea endpoints
  • More rescue medications used in control group

55
Phase III Studies Multiple Cycles
Protocols 052 and 054
  • Up to 5 additional cycles of blinded treatment
  • 68 out of 71 sites participated
  • Multiple cycle efficacy data collection
  • Two questions at Day 6 to 8 clinic visit in
    cycles 2 to 6
  • Did you have
  • 1) Emesis?
  • 2) Significant nausea interfering with daily life?

56
Phase III Studies Multiple Cycles
Observed Proportion of Patients without Emesis
and without Significant Nausea
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined
N 349 270 184 117 83N 393 278 180 111 72
57
Phase III Studies Multiple Cycles
Proportion of Patients Symptom Free by Cycle
Protocols 052 and 054 Combined
58
Aprepitant Efficacy Conclusions
  • Addition of aprepitant to a regimen of a 5-HT3
    receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid is
    beneficial in the prevention of nausea and
    vomiting due to highly emetogenic chemotherapy
  • The benefit is
  • Clinically important
  • Evident during both the acute and delayed phases
  • Sustained during multiple cycles of chemotherapy

59
Clinical Development Program
Number of Patients Receiving Aprepitant
60
Clinical Adverse Experience Summary
61
Most Common Serious Clinical AEs
(Incidence ?0.7)
62

Many Patients Still Experience Nausea
andVomiting After Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy
Time to First Emesis or Use of Rescue
Patients treated with best therapy available today
Control
Control
N260
N263
63
More Patients Benefit with Aprepitant
Time to First Emesis or Use of Rescue Therapy
Protocol 052
Protocol 054
APR 125/80 Regimen
APR 125/80 Regimen
Control
Control
Hours
Hours
APR N260 Control N260
APR N260 Control N263
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)