Voluntary vs Statutory Ombud Schemes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Voluntary vs Statutory Ombud Schemes

Description:

Mandate Resolve disputes between Credit Bureaux/Credit Providers (Banks, ... Focus on the commonalty. Across the Divide. Promote confidence in the industry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Lin8156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Voluntary vs Statutory Ombud Schemes


1
Voluntary vs Statutory Ombud Schemes
  • Presented by Manie van Schalkwyk

2
Agenda
  • Background
  • Voluntary VS Statutory Schemes
  • Across the Divide
  • The Divide
  • Hybrid Systems
  • Working Together
  • Conclusion

3
Background
  • CIO Voluntary Scheme established in 2004
  • Mandate Resolve disputes between Credit
    Bureaux/Credit Providers (Banks, Insurance
    Companies, Retailers, Mobile/Telecom companies
    and Microlenders) and Consumers/Businesses in
    terms of Credit Information when listed unfairly
    or incorrectly on Credit Bureaux.
  • In SA 4 Voluntary Schemes CIO, Banking, Short
    Term Insurance and Long Term Insurance
  • 2 Statutory Schemes Insurance Advice (Brokers)
    and Pension Funds

4
Voluntary VS Statutory
  • Situations where two parties are opposed to each
    other in some way, for example at a sporting
    event. One party is said to be versus another.
    Versus in this context is synonymous with
    "against".
  • Entering the era of coordination and working
    together
  • Focus on the commonalty

5
Across the Divide
  • Promote confidence in the industry
  • Unhappy consumers who could not resolve dispute
    with industry
  • Both investigate complaints with regard to good
    industry practice, what is fair and reasonable
  • Expectation from complainants to resolve
    complaints timeously
  • Expectation from both to provide good service,
    consistency, fairness and efficiency

6
Across the Divide
  • Accountable to stakeholders- Must have good
    administrative practices and decision making
    processes and have arrangements in place to
    safeguard its independence
  • In SA all rulings are binding on Industry
  • Office of last resort
  • We need to add value and make a difference

7
The Divide
  • Voluntary Schemes
  • Non legalistic
  • Buy-in from stakeholders
  • Easy to change and adapt
  • Criticism Not independent
  • Statutory Schemes
  • More legalistic
  • Legislation is forced on stakeholders
  • Any changes take time
  • Criticism Bureaucracy

8
The Divide
  • Does this make on Scheme better than the other ?
  • Place for Both
  • Small number of players with similar businesses
    or interest Easier to establish a Voluntary
    Scheme
  • Large number of players with diverse interests or
    businesses Easier to establish a Statutory
    Scheme

9
Hybrid System
  • Across the divide - Hybrid System
  • Voluntary Schemes with Statutory Recognition
  • In SA Financial Services Ombud Scheme Act
    FSOS
  • All Financial Ombud Schemes to apply for
    accreditation

10
Hybrid System
  • Objective of Act
  • Minimum requirements for Ombud Schemes
  • Promote Consumer Education
  • Coordination of Ombud Activities
  • Promote best practice for complaint resolution
  • Ensure independence of all schemes
  • Another way to create Hybrid system is for
    legislation to force Industry member to be part
    of a Ombud Scheme i.e. Credit Ombud

11
Working Together
  • We all understand the necessity and importance of
    proper governance, processes and procedures and
    administrative systems So why debate this
    Focus on the practical challenges that exists
  • Challenges exist for both systems
  • Identify common areas of challenges
  • Derive a plan to overcome these challenges

12
Working Together
  • All Ombud Schemes want to create awareness of
    existence with consumers
  • All Ombud Schemes want consumers to understand
    their rights and responsibilities
  • All Ombud Schemes want footprint and easy access
    for consumers
  • All Ombud Schemes want to eliminate any confusion
    with consumers in terms of which Ombud Scheme has
    jurisdiction

13
Working Together
  • Confusion with Consumers ito jurisdiction
  • Create one entry point for all financial consumer
    complaints
  • Establish a call centre to serve as switchboard
    and direct the call to relevant Ombud Scheme or
    Regulator
  • Consumer lack of awareness and difficult access
  • Establish offices with Government to serve as
    centralised complaints office for all financial
    complaints. Complaints referred to call centre
    who in turn refer to relevant Ombud Scheme or
    Regulator

14
Working Together
  • Consumer Education
  • Share resources to promote Ombud offices and
    provide consumers with education about their
    rights and responsibilities
  • Make consumer aware of compliant mechanisms which
    include Ombud Schemes

15
Conclusion
  • Recognize the different offices for the purpose
    that it fulfill Voluntary/Statutory or Hybrid
  • Identify areas to add value and make a difference
  • Coordinate efforts and work together as Ombud
    Industry
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com