Can you read this - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 74
About This Presentation
Title:

Can you read this

Description:

The material we will cover in Biology 114 is very much different from that ... Georges Cuvier, 1769-1832, Catastrophism (e.g., Noah's flood) (geology) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 75
Provided by: Stephen70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Can you read this


1
Can you read this?
If you cant read this then you really ought to
move to a new seat!
2
How about now?
If you cant read this then you really ought to
move to a new seat!
3
(No Transcript)
4
Darwinian Evolution
The material we will cover in Biology 114 is very
much different from that covered in Biology 113,
particularly in terms of the perspective and
approach of those who engage in these difference
aspects of biology. It is almost as though
biology consists of two very different sciences,
a reductionist science that seeks to emulate
chemistry or physics (113), and a much more
philosophical science that is interested as much
in the subtleties of history as it is in rigors
of the more exact physical sciences (114). This
is not to say that we will not be learning real
science in Biology 114, but instead that the
general approach of learning that we will employ
in Biology 114 will be somewhat different from
that of Biology 113. In Biology 113, basically,
you sought to understand how a cell works. Here
we will deal with such squishy topics as why it
is the cells that we observe exist at all. Keep
an open mind and study hard. By the end of this
term you will have gained an appreciation of the
most important concept in Biology Darwinian
evolution.
5
Darwinian Evolution
"The process of evolution can be summarized in
three sentences Genes mutate. Individuals are
selected. Populations evolve."
6
Charles Darwin
7
Major Goals of this Chapter
  • Get a Feeling for what it means for two organisms
    to be Evolutionarily Related
  • Get a feeling for what is meant by Selection
    (a.k.a., Natural Selection) and by Darwinian
    Evolution
  • Get a feeling for how we infer that organisms are
    evolutionarily related

8
1st Major Goal of Chapter 22
  • Get a Feeling for what it means for two organisms
    to be Evolutionarily Related
  • Hint It means that the two organisms are related
    by Blood!
  • Individuals from different Species are just very
    distantly related Cousins! (All of Diversity of
    Life)
  • Just as You and I are, only even more distantly
    related

9
Cousins
10
A Cladogram A Graphed Phylogeny
11
Relatedness ofAll Cellular Organisms
12
Relatedness of All Eukaryotes
13
Relatedness of All Plants
14
Relatedness of All Fungi
15
Relatedness of All Animals
16
2nd Major Goal of Chapter
  • Get a feeling for what is meant by Selection
    (a.k.a., Natural Selection) and Darwinian
    Evolution
  • History of Evolutionary Thinking
  • Malthus Logic
  • Mayrs Logical Summary of Darwinian Evolution and
    Natural Selection
  • Natural Selection and Adaptation
  • Artificial Selection
  • Observation of Selection (in particularly, as a
    consequence of Man the Modifier of Environments)

17
History of Evolutionary Thinking
18
History of Evolutionary Thinking
  • Aristotle, 384-322 B.C.E., Scala Naturae (biology)
  • Aristotle, 384-322 B.C.E., Scala Naturae
    (biology)
  • Natural Theology (understanding nature for the
    sake of understanding the glory of creators
    universe)
  • Carolus Linnaeus, 1707-1778, Taxonomy (organizing
    organisms by phenotypic similarity) (biology)
  • Georges Cuvier, 1769-1832, Catastrophism (e.g.,
    Noahs flood) (geology)
  • James Hutton, 1729-1797, Gradualism (geology)
  • Charles Lyell, 1797-1875, Uniformitarianism (same
    processes today as yesterday) (geology)
  • Jean Baptiste Lamarck, 1744-1829, Adaptation
    (environment ? phenotypic change) (biology)
  • Thomas Malthus, 1766-1834, Limits on Population
    Growth (biology economics)
  • Charles Darwin, 1809-1882, Natural Selection
    (environment ? genotypic change) (biology)
  • Alfred Russel Wallace, 1823-1913, Ditto

19
Hutton vs. Lyell
Gradualism
Uniformitariansim
20
Malthus Logic
Limits Imposed by Environments
21
Ernst Mayrs Summation
  • Observation 1 ? Populations tend to have high
    reproductive potentials.
  • Observation 2 ? Populations tend to be stable in
    size.
  • Observation 3 ? Environments tend to possess
    limited resources.
  • Inference 1 ? There exists a struggle for
    existence.
  • Observation 4 ? There exists phenotypic variation
    within populations.
  • Observation 5 ? Some phenotypic variation is
    heritable.
  • Inference 2 ? Within populations there is
    differential reproductive success that is
    influenced by phenotypic differences between
    individuals.
  • Inference 3 ? Differential reproductive success
    leads to a decline in frequency of genotypes that
    underlie phenotypes that are less fit to the
    environment and a corresponding increase in
    frequency of genotypes that underlie phenotypes
    that are more fit to the environment Darwinian
    Evolution.

22
Ernst Mayrs Summation
  • Populations tend to have high reproductive
    potentials (?).
  • Populations tend to be stable in size (?).
  • Environments tend to possess limited resources
    (?).
  • Therefore there exists a struggle for existence.

23
Ernst Mayrs Summation
  • There exists phenotypic variation within
    populations.
  • Some phenotypic variation is heritable.
  • Within populations there is differential
    reproductive success.
  • That differential reproductive success is
    influenced by phenotypic differences between
    individuals.

24
Ernst Mayrs Summation
  • Differential reproductive success leads to a
    decline in frequency of genotypes that underlie
    phenotypes that are less fit to the environment.
  • Differential reproductive success also results in
    a corresponding increase in frequency of
    genotypes that underlie phenotypes that are more
    fit to the environment.
  • This idea that differential reproductive success
    modifies genotypic frequencies in a manner that
    in principle may be predicted given knowledge of
    circumstances is know as Darwinian Evolution.
  • More specifically, it is known as Natural
    Selection.

25
(No Transcript)
26
Major Goals of this Chapter
  • Get a Feeling for what it means for two organisms
    to be Evolutionarily Related
  • Get a feeling for what is meant by Selection
    (a.k.a., Natural Selection) and Darwinian
    Evolution
  • Get a feeling for how we infer that organisms are
    evolutionarily related
  • By the way, expect a Chapter 23 reading quiz on
    Wednesday! ?

27
Ernst Mayrs Summation
  • Observation 1 ? Populations tend to have high
    reproductive potentials.
  • Observation 2 ? Populations tend to be stable in
    size.
  • Observation 3 ? Environments tend to possess
    limited resources.
  • Inference 1 ? There exists a struggle for
    existence.
  • Observation 4 ? There exists phenotypic variation
    within populations.
  • Observation 5 ? Some phenotypic variation is
    heritable.
  • Inference 2 ? Within populations there is
    differential reproductive success that is
    influenced by phenotypic differences between
    individuals.
  • Inference 3 ? Differential reproductive success
    leads to a decline in frequency of genotypes that
    underlie phenotypes that are less fit to the
    environment and a corresponding increase in
    frequency of genotypes that underlie phenotypes
    that are more fit to the environment Darwinian
    Evolution.

28
An Alternative Perspective
  • DNA (or RNA for some viruses) relatively stable
    information storage molecule ?
  • Mutations changes in nucleotide sequence (new
    alleles) ?
  • Change in Genotype (particularly if germ-line
    mutation) ?
  • Can result in heritable changes in Phenotype
    (environment can also modify phenotype) giving
    rise to ?
  • Variation among individuals making up populations
    (multiple alelles polymorphism variation not
    necessarily adaptive) ?
  • Variation comes under the influence of the
    evolutionary forces of drift, selection, or
    migration ?
  • Changes in Allele Frequencies ( evolution
    chapter 23) ?
  • Changes in allele frequencies combined with
    reproductive isolation can result in Speciation
    (new species see chapter 24 macroevolution) ?
  • Species either give rise to new species or are
    evolutionary dead ends (covered in chapter 25) ?
  • In either case, all species eventually go extinct

29
An Alternative Perspective
30
Summation of Darwinism
  • From p. 435 of your text (6th edition)
  • Natural selection is differential success in
    reproduction
  • (unequal ability of individuals to survive
    and reproduce)
  • note that the emaphisis on reproduction,
    not survival
  • Natural selection occurs through an interaction
    between the environment and the variability
    inherent among individual organisms making up a
    population.
  • The product of natural selection is the
    adaptation of populations of organisms to their
    environment

31
Intra-Specific Variation (evolutionary potential)
32
Natural Selection Adaptation
  • Cumulative Adaptation is an important consequence
    specifically of Natural Selection
  • Adaptations essentially are better fits between
    phenotypes and environments
  • Natural Selection serves to edit less-adaptive
    variation out of populations
  • Fitness is defined in terms of reproductive
    success
  • Variation that contributes to greater
    reproductive success, in the face of Natural
    Selection, tends to be retained within
    populations
  • Note that I qualify the link between Adaptation
    Selection with the term Cumulative because it
    is mutation that gives rise to new alleles, not
    selection
  • Natural Selection, in particular, serves to
    increase the likelihood that adaptive mutations
    may be found in the same individuals

33
Natural Selection Adaptation
34
Artificial Selection Cruciforms
35
Artificial Selection Various Animals
36
Man Modifier of Environments
Can you see the moths?
37
Man Modifier of Environments
38
Man Modifier of Environments
39
Evolution of Antiobiotic Resistance
40
Evolution in Action
  • Antibiotic resistance in bacteria
  • Antiviral resistance in viruses (including, of
    course, HIV)
  • Insecticide resistance in insects (above)
  • Industrial Melanism (also above)
  • Evolution of resistance to toxins and heavy
    metals (a consequence of toxic-waste dumping)
  • Sickle cell anemia (and over dominance)
  • Predator selection on guppies (earlier sexual
    development)
  • Evolution of sex ratios (towards 11 male to
    female)
  • Progression of cancer (and cancer resistance to
    chemotherapeutics)
  • Evolution of pathogen virulence
  • Etc.

41
Important Caveats
  • From p. 437 of your text (6th edition)
  • Natural selection occurs through interactions
    between individual organisms and their
    environment, but individuals do not evolve.
  • Evolution can be measured only as changes in
    relative proportions of heritable variations in a
    population over a succession of generations.
  • Natural selection can amplify or diminish only
    heritable variations.
  • We must distinguish between adaptations an
    organism acquires by its own actions and
    inherited adaptations that evolve in a population
    over many generations as a result of natural
    selection.

42
Important Caveats
It must also be emphasized that the specifics of
natural selection are situational environmental
factors vary from place to place and from time to
time. An adaptation in one situation may be
useless or even detrimental in different
circumstances. p. 437
43
3nd Major Goal of Chapter
  • Get a feeling for how we infer that organisms are
    evolutionarily related.
  • Answer 1 we can infer evolutionary distance via
    phenotypic similarity (but not always easily)
  • Answer 2 we can infer evolutionary distance via
    genotypic similarity (easier but not always
    unambiguous)
  • Answer 3 From the immense body of evidence
    available it is difficult, by Occams Razor, to
    conclude that organisms are not evolutionarily
    related

44
Occams Razor (through the ages)
45
Evolution of Artifacts
Isnt it Obvious that these cars are
Related? Isnt Relationship the Simplest
Explanation for Similarity? In biology,
information is carried by genes so relationship
is by decent.
46
Homologies
  • Homologies are Similarities between organisms
  • that are present due to Common Descent,
  • which means they (the organisms) share ancestry
  • evolutionary relatedness

47
Homologies
Homologies tend to predict additional
Homologies ? e.g., if an animal has feathers it
probably also has wings
48
Homologies
49
(No Transcript)
50
Homologies
Note not just similar looking but similar
embryonic origins.
51
Homologies
52
Modern Criteria for Homology
  • Positional Homology Two structures are
    homologous if they have the same arrangements of
    similar parts
  • Developmental Homology Two structures are
    homologous if they develop in the same way
  • Genetic Homology Two structures are homologous
    if their development is controlled by the same or
    similar genes
  • Phylogenic Homology Two structures are
    homologous if they appear to be inherited from a
    common ancestor
  • From http//faculty.uca.edu/benw/biol4402/lectu
    re5/sld007.htm
  • Also amino acid or nucleotide homologies

53
Molecular Homologies
54
Skull Homologies
55
Human-Bonobo Homologies
56
Vestigial Structures
Keep in mind that Vestigeal Structures are
Homologies
57
Developmental Error
58
Comparative Embryology
Keep in mind that Embryological Similarites are
Homologies
Could you assemble a phylogeny based on this
figure?
59
Analogies
Analogies do not tend to predict Homologies,
e.g., if an animal has wings it does not
necessarily also have feathers (analogies,
however, can predict related structural
similarities, e.g., wings flying lightweight
bodies)
Keep in mind that Analogies are NOT Homologies
60
Convergent Evolution
Analogies are products of Convergent Evolution
61
Complications
62
Biogeography
  • Organisms, basically, are limited in their
    ability to disperse
  • As a consequence, evolutionary lineages are more
    likely to evolve locally (or regionally) rather
    than globally
  • If you were inferring the relatedness of three
    species, two of which were found in the same
    region, the third on a different continent, you
    would predict a closer relatedness of the first
    two
  • Homologies often correlate with geography (e.g.,
    old-world vs. new-world monkeys)

63
The Fossil Record
64
(No Transcript)
65
Link to Next Presentation
66
Acknowledgements
http//207.233.
67
Charles Darwin
68
Relatedness ofAll Cellular Organisms
69
Relatedness of All Animals
70
Relatedness of All Chordates
71
Relatedness of All Vertebrates
72
Relatedness of All Amniotes
73
Relatedness of All Mammals
74
Relatedness of All Hominids
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com