Interconnect Focus Center - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Interconnect Focus Center

Description:

Advisors: Prof. Duane Boning, Prof. Michael Perrott. MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories ... Prof. Duane Boning, Prof. Mike Perrott ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ndr3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interconnect Focus Center


1
Variation Aware Design of On-Chip Optical Clock
Receiver Circuits
Nigel Drego Advisors Prof. Duane Boning, Prof.
Michael Perrott
MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
1
Interconnect Focus Center
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Past Work
  • Goals
  • Current Design
  • Results
  • Conclusions and Future Work

3
Introduction Optical Interconnect
  • Transmit signals optically on a single chip
    rather than between chips
  • Potential advantages Reduced propagation delay,
    skew, jitter, crosstalk, and power
  • Issues Variation introduces skew and jitter into
    optical networks as well

Key Focus Variation Robust Receiver Circuits
4
Past Work
  • S. Sam showed (1st Generation Receiver)
  • Process and environmental variation contribute
    greatly to skew
  • Baseline 0.25mm optical receivers were limited to
    frequencies below 1GHz
  • A. Lum (2nd Generation Receiver)
  • Employed bandgap reference for temperature-indepen
    dent biasing
  • Voltage regulator increased immunity to VDD
    fluctuation
  • VCSEL integration by wafer bonding (with C.
    Fonstad)
  • Issues
  • Skew due to process variation still too high
  • Jitter, noise not characterized
  • Receiver area large (205.5mm x 170mm)

5
Current Design Goals
  • Improve robustness to process variation
  • More analysis/characterization
  • Vary individual circuit parameters rather than
    solely relying on process corners
  • Mismatch analysis
  • Characterization of noise susceptibility and
    resultant jitter analysis
  • Scale to higher frequencies while maintaining
    high sensitivities
  • Reduce power, area

Key Focus Variation Robustness
6
Current Design Circuit Topology
  • Fully-differential architecture
  • Employ common-mode and power-supply rejection
  • Low-pass filtering easier, reduction in size of
    passives
  • Enables common centroid layout
  • Differential pair amplifiers with resistive loads
  • Process-compensated current reference
  • Need stable currents, not voltages (as bandgap
    reference provides)

7
Current Design Input Stage
  • Want low input-impedance node with high
    transimpedance gain

8
Current Design Voltage Amplification Stages
  • Resistive loads
  • Resistor values lt 5k?, so area is not a major
    concern
  • DC biasing set by current and resistor values
  • Can achieve A ¼ 2-2.5 V/ V with 3dB bandwidth
    10GHz in 0.18mm CMOS
  • Multiple stages (4-5) required before sending
    analog signal to inverters to be railed
  • Reduces 3dB bandwidth to 3-3.5 GHz

9
Current Design Amplifier Optimization
  • Deep sub-micron transistors depart from
    square-law operation
  • fT dependent on gm
  • Use simulated gm curve of a single transistor and
    plot desired gain, swing versus current density !
    Width of device determined by load and desired
    bandwidth

10
Current Design Process Compensated Current
Reference
Narendra et al. A Sub-1V Process-Compensated MOS
Current Generation Without Voltage Reference.
VLSI Digital Circuits. 2001.
  • Want stable reference current from which bias
    currents are derived
  • Bandgap reference provides stable reference
    voltage, but variation in bias transistors will
    result in variation in bias currents
  • Process-compensated current reference (shown
    above) provides simple method of achieving
    variation-robust reference current

11
Current Design Output Stage
  • Cascaded inverters to rail analog signal to
    digital logic levels

12
Results
  • Circuit operates at 2GHz (10m A differential
    input photocurrent)
  • Operation at 3GHz with increased optical power
    (due to gain roll-off)
  • Preliminary skew analysis at process corners are
    encouraging
  • 65ps skew between SS and TT corners (corresponds
    to 7.5 Lpoly and 23 VT) compared to gt100ps in
    previous design with smaller variation
  • 120ps between SS and FF corners ! can we
    integrate deskew mechanisms now?
  • More analysis and optimization to be done

13
Conclusions and Future Work
  • High frequency (gt2GHz) optical clock receivers
    are feasible
  • Design techniques can help to increase robustness
    to process and environmental variation
  • In-depth variation analysis will help to
    understand relation between circuit operation and
    variation sources
  • Near term work
  • Circuit optimization, layout
  • Mismatch, noise analysis
  • Longer term
  • System-level analysis of variation sources in
    optical clock distribution networks
  • Demonstration of complete, integrated optical
    clock distribution networks

14
Acknowledgements
  • MARCO Interconnect Focus Center
  • Prof. Duane Boning, Prof. Mike Perrott
  • Mike Mills, Joseph Panganiban, and Karen
    Gonzalez-Valentin
  • Pawan Kapur
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com