Title: Using Indirect Reasoning
1Using Indirect Reasoning
- 3 steps to writing an Indirect Proof
2What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- Triangle PQR is equilateral
- Triangle PQR is a right triangle
- Triangle PQR is isosceles
3Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- Triangle PQR is equilateral
- Triangle PQR is a right triangle
- Triangle PQR is isosceles
- 1 2
4Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- ABCD is a parallelogram.
- ABCD is a trapezoid.
- ABCD has two acute angles.
5Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- ABCD is a parallelogram.
- ABCD is a trapezoid.
- ABCD has two acute angles.
- 1 2
6Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- Line l and m are skew.
- Line l and m do not intersect
- Line l is parallel to line m.
7Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- Line l and m are skew.
- Line l and m do not intersect
- Line l is parallel to line m.
- 1 3
8Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- Segment FG is parallel to segment KL.
- Segment FG is perpendicular to segment KL.
- Segment FG is parallel to segment KL.
9Identify the pair of statements that form a
Contradiction.
- Segment FG is parallel to segment KL.
- Segment FG is perpendicular to segment KL.
- Segment FG is parallel to segment KL.
- 1 2
10Step One
- Assume that the opposite of what you want to
prove is true.
11Step One
- Assume that the opposite of what you want to
prove is true.
Ex) Statement It is raining outside
12Step One Indirect Proof
- Assume that the opposite of what you want to
prove is true.
Ex) Statement It is raining outside Assume It
is NOT raining outside.
13Examples Step One
- 1. ltJ is not a right angle.
14Examples Step One
- ltJ is not a right angle.
- Assume ltJ is a right angle
15Examples Step One
- 1. Segment YX is congruent to segment AB.
16Examples Step One
- Segment YX is congruent to segment AB.
- Assume Segment YX is not congruent to segment AB.
17Examples Step One
- 1. Triangle PEN is isosceles.
18Examples Step One
- Triangle PEN is isosceles.
- Assume Triangle PEN is scalene.
19Examples Step One
20Examples Step One
- mlt2 gt 90
- Assume mlt2 90.
21Examples Step One
- 1. At least one angle is obtuse
22Examples Step One
- At least one angle is obtuse
- Assume that no angles are obtuse.
23Step Two Indirect Proof
- Use logical reasoning to reach a contradiction of
an earlier statement, such as the given
information or a theorem. Then state that the
assumption you made was false.
24Step Two Indirect Proof
- What is the contradiction of step one?
Ex) Statement It is raining outside Step One It
is not raining outside Step Two The clouds are
out and water is coming out of them.
25Examples Step Two
- What is the contradiction with step one?
- Statement mlt2 gt 90
- Step One Assume mlt2 90.
- Step Two ?
100
26Examples Step Two
- What is the contradiction with step one?
- Statement mlt2 gt 90
- Step One Assume mlt2 90.
- Step Two The mlt2 110 which is bigger than 90.
100
27Examples Step Two
- What is the contradiction to step one?
- 2. Triangle PEN is isosceles.
- Step One Assume Triangle PEN is scalene.
P
E
N
28Examples Step Two
- What is the contradiction to step one?
- 2. Triangle PEN is isosceles.
- Step One Assume Triangle PEN is scalene.
- Step Two NP and EN are congruent so PEN cant be
scalene.
P
E
N
29Step 3 Indirect Proof
- State that what you want to prove must be true.
30What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- There are three types of drawbridges bascule,
lift, and swing. This drawbridge does not swing
or lift.
31What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- There are three types of drawbridges bascule,
lift, and swing. This drawbridge does not swing
or lift. - Conclusion The bridge is a bascule.
32What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- If this were the day of the party, our friends
would be home. No one is home.
33What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- If this were the day of the party, our friends
would be home. No one is home. - Conclusion The party is not today.
34What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- Every air traffic controller in the world speaks
English on the job. Sumiko does not speak English.
35What conclusion follows from the pair of
statements?
- Every air traffic controller in the world speaks
English on the job. Sumiko does not speak
English. - Conclusion Sumiko is not an air traffic
controller.
363 Steps to an Indirect Proof
- 1. Assume that the opposite of what you want to
prove is true. - 2. Use logical reasoning to reach a contradiction
of an earlier statement, then state that the
assumption you made was false. - 3. State that what you want to prove must be true.