Title: Hello! My Name is: Andrew L. Cherry, DSW, ACSW
1 Teaching Best Practices in an Evolving Science
Treating People with Co-Occurring Disorders
2 PRESENTERS Andrew L. Cherry, DSW, ACSWOklahoma
Endowed Professor of Mental Health,University
of Oklahoma, School of Social Work, Tulsa
Campus. Mary E. Dillon, MSW, Ed.DOK-COSIG
Associate EvaluatorTulsa, OK. L. D. Barney,
LADCSt. Anthony's Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK
MSW Student, University of Oklahoma, Norman
Campus.
3Presentation Overview
- The presentation addresses issues relevant to
social work practice and social work education
raised by the President's New Freedom Commission
report, which calls for a transformation in
mental health and substance abuse care in the
United States (Farkas, Anthony, 2006). - The President's New Freedom Commission report can
be found at http//www.mentalhealthcommission.gov
/
4Primary Issues
- The primary issues for social work educators
cluster around preparing students to participate
and contribute to the transformation taking place
in health care. - How do we determine what to teach?
- What services and modalities meet the criteria of
best-practices? - More critical is the task of equipping students
with skills to identify best practices as the
science evolves throughout their professional
career.
5Best Practices State-of-the-Art
- The concept of using "best practices" carries the
connotation of being state-of-the-art treatment
(Bushy, 2006). - This presentation highlights research conducted
over four years by the authors in the
development, implementation, and evaluation of a
state initiative to develop best practice
services for people with co-occurring disorders.
- The development of best practice interventions
that evolved from the mid 1990s and in particular
since 2003as a result of the SAMHSA Co-Occurring
State Incentive Grant (COSIG)provides a set of
principals and approaches for identifying best
practices.
6Promising Practice Evidence-Based Practice
- In the mental health and substance abuse
literature, Best Practices tends to fall into
two general categories promising practice
(empirically supported, consensus-based, direct
practice techniques) and evidence-based
practice. - Promising practices are typically based on
practice wisdom and studies that suggest such
practices are safe and possibly effective.
7Evidence-Based Practices
- Evidence-based practices are derived from
research and meta-analyses. The procedures used
in evidence-based practice are standardized and
can be replicated. - Evidence-based practices are characterized by the
use of empirical research techniques (randomized
controlled trials similar to those used to test
medical interventions) to demonstrate that the
evidence-based practice produces a positive
outcome. And, there is ongoing objective
evaluation of clinical cases to monitor the
effectiveness of the evidence-based practice
(Lakeman, 2008 Stuart, Lilienfeld, 2007).
8There is a Disconnect
- The primary issues for social work educators is
related to preparing students to participate and
contribute to the current transformation and
future innovations. - In part, this disconnect between Social Work
education and the training needs of our students
is responsible for the science to service lag
reiterated by the Annapolis Coalition on the
Behavioral Health Workforce in 2007. Their point
was that it takes well over a decade for proven
interventions to make their way into practice,
since prevention and treatment services are
driven more by tradition than by science
(Glisson, 2007 Hoge, et al., 2007).
9Bridging the Gap
- Social work educators are well positioned to
bridge the gap between the training provided in
schools of social work and workforce needs in the
treatment community to provide best practice
services, for example, for people with a
co-occurring disorder. Teaching best practices,
however, must include teaching students how to
identify best practices as the science evolves
(Mendel, et al., 2008). - For most Social Work Faculty this means retooling
our curricula.
10Retooling Our Curricula
- First, Social Work curricula has not kept pace
with the dramatic changes wrought by managed
care, health care reforms, and presented here as
and example, the ongoing transformation in the
treatment for people with a co-occurring
disorder. - This lag of teaching current best practices has
left our students unprepared for contemporary
practice environments. - It takes more than telling our students that best
practices are out there.
11Retooling Our Curricula (contd)
- Second, too many programs persist in using
passive, didactic models of instructions that
have been proven ineffective in changing practice
patterns or improving healthcare outcomes. - Third, consumers and their families, who play an
enormous care-giving role, typically receive no
educational support, nor is their considerable
expertise about the lived experience of illness
and recovery tapped by engaging them as educators
of our students (Hoge Morris, 2004).
12Best Practices in Behavioral Health Education
Training
- Six recommendations for the how, what, where,
and who of Social Work Education and Training - Best Practice 1 Professional social work
training needs to instill an understanding of the
competing paradigms of service delivery and the
diverse scientific, economic, and social forces
that shape healthcare and social services.
13Recommendations (contd 2)
- Best Practice 2 Curricula are routinely updated
to address the values, knowledge, and skills
essential for practice in contemporary health and
social service systems - Best Practice 3 Best practice guidelines need
to be used as teaching tools
14Recommendations (contd 3)
- Best Practice 4 Teaching methods need to be
evidence-based - Best Practice 5 Social Work educators need to
be knowledgeable and experienced in providing
best practices in the delivery of healthcare and
social services - Best Practice 6 To deal with the evolving
science, students need to learn the importance of
engaging in lifelong learning (Hoge, Huey,
OConnell, 2004).
15Underprepared from the Moment They Complete
Their Training
- While the incidence of co-occurring mental and
addictive disorders among individuals has
increased dramatically, most of the workforce
lacks the array of skills needed to assess and
treat persons with these co-occurring conditions.
Training and education programs largely have
ignored the need to alter their curricula to
address this problem, and, thus, the nation
continues to prepare new members of the workforce
who simply are underprepared from the moment they
complete their training (SAMHSA, 2007).
16Impact of a Best Practice
- What is the outcome of a best practice that is
taught to a community of clinicians? - The results of the Oklahoma-COSIG evaluation is a
case example. - This is a comparative study of the outcome of
19,241 people who were treated in 15 co-occurring
model programs that identified and implemented
best practices and 5 control programs that used
typical treatment.
17Description of those Treated
- Age Differences As a group people with an
indication of a co-occurring disorder who enter
treatment tended to be younger. - Education There was no significant difference
in education among males however, women with an
indication of a co-occurring disorder had
slightly less education than women without an
indication of a co-occurring disorder. - Income The average yearly reported income for
men admitted to treatment was 11,636, slightly
higher than for women admitted for treatment
(10,648). The per capita income in Oklahoma in
2006 was 32,391.
18Description of those Treated (contd 2)
- Homelessness Both men and women with an
indication of a co-occurring disorder were likely
to be homeless. Among homeless people in this
study sample approximately 50 were identified as
having a co-occurring disorder. - Admission Status You can expect both men and
women with a co-occurring disorder to be admitted
as a result of a legal intervention. - Arrests Men and women with an indication of a
co-occurring disorder will have had more arrests
when entering treatment. - Serious Mental Illness People with a
co-occurring disorder were less likely to be
identified as having a serious mental disorder
(men 25, women 15).
19Outcomes
- Preliminary Findings Differences between Model
programs and Control programs on identifying
people with a co-occurring disorder (N 19,241).
Model and Control Programs MEN No COD MEN COD Women No COD Women COD
Model 54.5 45.5 66.3 33.7
Control 75.5 24.5 82.2 17.8
20Outcomes (contd 2)
- Preliminary Findings Differences between Model
programs and Control programs on Treatment
Completion (N 19,241).
Model and Control Programs MEN No COD MEN COD Women No COD Women COD
Model 57.5 70.4 45 65.5
Control 25.5 29 15 17
21Outcomes (contd 3)
- Preliminary Findings Differences between
Mental Health Model programs and Control programs
on Days in Treatment (N 19,241).
Model and Control Programs MEN No COD MEN COD Women No COD Women COD
Model 86 41 109 54
Control 192 190 212 222
22Outcomes (contd 4)
- Preliminary Findings Differences between
Substance Abuse TX Model programs and Control
programs on Days in Treatment (N 19,241).
Model and Control Programs MEN No COD MEN COD Women No COD Women COD
Model 79 70 76 66
Control 55 50 71 54
23Identifying Best Practices
- Teaching best practices, however, must include
learning how to identify best practices and
teaching students how to identify best practices
in their careers as the science evolves (Mendel,
et al., 2008). - Our study and the literature suggests that there
are three basic principals for identifying best
practice interventions, services, and modalities
in an evolving science.
24Three Principals
- The first principal is Do no harm. There are
evidence-based practices that are of low and high
risk. Interventions that depend on cohesive
techniques are more risky than collaborative
techniques. - The second principal is that evidence-based
practices meet the value-based principals of
social work practice. For instance, a best
practice intervention must also be culturally
appropriate. - The third principal is that the intervention
increases optimal outcomes for participants
(Bushy, 2006 Petr Walter, 2005).
25Conclusion
- We teach to prepare our students for the world of
social work practice. Like the world, however,
the profession and our students are facing a
rapidly changing practice landscape. - This is problematic because
- Social Work curricula has not kept pace with the
dramatic changes in health care reforms, - This lag of teaching current best practices has
left our students unprepared for contemporary
practice,
26Conclusion (contd )
- There are specific steps we need to take
- We need to engage the expertise of consumers and
families as educators of our students, - Evidence-based practices must meet the
value-based principals of social work practice, - Best practice guidelines need to be used as
teaching tools, - To deal with the evolving science, faculty and
students need to learn the importance of engaging
in lifelong learning.
27