Lecture 4' Modern semioticians - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 4' Modern semioticians

Description:

Born in Keblaste (now Mihkli), Estonia. He studied zoology in the University of Tartu (then Dorpat). Sebeok, Thure von Uexkuel (son) 'discovered' him as semiotician ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: aa275
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 4' Modern semioticians


1
Lecture 4. Modern semioticians
  • Uexkuel representative of biosemiotics
  • Greimas representative of structuralism,
    linguistics

2
Jakob von Uexkuel(1864-1944)
  • Born in Keblaste (now Mihkli), Estonia. He
    studied zoology in the University of Tartu (then
    Dorpat).
  • Sebeok, Thure von Uexkuel (son) discovered him
    as semiotician
  • A representative of biological semiotics, a
    theoretical biologist.
  • http//home.datacomm.ch/biografien/biografien/uexk
    uell.htm
  • Jakob von Uexküll Centre. TARTU, ESTONIA (founded
    in 1993). http//www.zbi.ee/uexkull/
  • He is recognised as the founder of biosemiotics
    (Theory of meaning, Bedeutungslehre, 1940).
  • Biosemiotics and theoretical biology links
    (papers online) http//www.zbi.ee/kalevi/vaheleh
    t.htm
  • Links http//www.zbi.ee/uexkull/link.htm
  • In wikipedia. http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakob_v
    on_UexkC3BCll
  • K.Kull (2001). Jakob von Uexküll An
    introduction. Semiotica 134(1/4) 1-59.

3
Semiotics of Jakob von Uexkuel main ideas
  • UmweltUmwelt is the semiotic world of organism.
    It includes all the meaningful aspects of the
    world for a particular organism. Thus, Umwelt is
    a term uniting all the semiotic processes of an
    organism into a whole. Kalevi Kull. On
    semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere.
    http//www.zbi.ee/kalevi/jesphohp.htm
  • Umwelt is a subjective world of an organism. It
    consist of the perceptual (Merkwelt) and
    operational parts (Wirkwelt).
  • Functional circle. It describes interaction of an
    organism with its Umwelt.

4
Functional circle of Uexkuell
  • Receiver of meaning (subject) lt - gt Carrier of
    meaning (object)
  • Carrier of perceptual sygnal, perceptual world,
    perceptual organ
  • Carrier of effect sygnal, operational (motor)
    world, effector organ
  • In Biologische Semiotik. http//homepage.ruhr-uni
    -bochum.de/Udo.Figge/texte/uexkuell.htm

5
Links
  • Kalevi Kull. Biosemiotics in the twentieth
    century a view from biology. Semiotica vol.
    127(1/4), pp. 385-414 (1999). http//www.zbi.ee/7
    Ekalevi/bsxxfin.htm

6
Algirdas Julius Greimas
  • Algirdas Julius Greimas, or Algirdas Julien
    Greimas (born March 9, 1917 in Tula, died 1992 in
    Paris), was a linguist who contributed to the
    theory of semiotics, and also researched
    Lithuanian mythology.
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algirdas_Julius_Greim
    as

7
Writings
  • Greimas, Algirdas. (1987). On Meaning Selected
    Writings in Semiotic Theory. (Translated by Paul
    J Perron Frank H Collins). London Frances
    Pinter.

8
  • Quel est l'apport d'A.J. Greimas et de l'Ecole de
    Paris ?
  • A.J. Greimas et l'Ecole de Paris ont réalisé une
    synthèse cohérente d'apports très différents mais
    tous fondés sur le binarisme en linguistique,
    sociologie et ethnologie. Leur méthode est une
    référence obligée pour tout ce qui concerne les
    textes narratifs. On peut cependant émettre des
    réserves quant à sa validité pour les autres
    types de textes et des doutes pour tout ce qui
    touche aux phénomènes sémiotiques
    non-linguistiques.
  • http//www.univ-perp.fr/see/rch/lts/MARTY/s020.htm

9
Main contributions
  • Algirdas Julius Greimas developed a structural
    version of semiotics named generative semiotics,
    trying to shift the focus of discipline from
    signs to systems of signification. His theories
    develop the ideas of Saussure, Hjelmslev, Claude
    Lévi-Strauss, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty.
    Semiotics. http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics
  • Semiotic square Greimas introduced the semiotic
    square as a means of mapping the logical
    conjunctions and disjunctions relating key
    semantic features in a text. If we begin by
    drawing a horizontal line linking two familiarly
    paired terms such as 'beautiful' and 'ugly', we
    turn this into a semiotic square by making this
    the upper line of a square in which the two other
    logical possibilities - 'not ugly' and 'not
    beautiful' occupy the lower corners. The semiotic
    square reminds us that this is not simply a
    binary opposition because something which is not
    beautiful is not necessarily ugly and that
    something which is not ugly is not necessarily
    beautiful. Occupying a position within such as
    framework invests a sign with meanings. The
    semiotic square can be used to highlight 'hidden'
    underlying themes in a text or practice.
    (Semiotics for Beginners )
  • The semiotic square is the elementary structure
    of signification http//www.cla.purdue.edu/english
    /theory/narratology/modules/greimassquare.html

10
Semiotic square
  • Algirdas Greimas introduced the semiotic square
    (which he adapted from the 'logical square' of
    scholastic philosophy) as a means of analysing
    paired concepts more fully.
  • The semiotic square can be used to highlight
    'hidden' underlying themes in a text or practice.
  • From Daniel Chandler. Semiotics for Beginners.

11
Examples
  • http//www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/narratolo
    gy/modules/greimassquare.html

12
Examples
  • http//www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/narratolo
    gy/modules/greimassquare.html

13
The Traditional Square of Opposition
The doctrine of the square of opposition
originated with Aristotle in the fourth century
BC and has occurred in logic texts ever since.
The square of opposition is a group of theses
embodied in a diagram. The diagram is not
essential to the theses it is just a useful way
to keep them straight. The theses concern logical
relations among four logical formsFrom
http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/square/
14
The Traditional Square of Opposition
15
Links (Greimas)
  • THE SEMIOTICS OF A. J. GREIMAS AN INTRODUCTION.
    By MARVIN KATILIUS-BOYDSTUN. http//www.lituanus.o
    rg/1990_3/90_3_02.htm
  • Timothy Lenoir. Was That Last Turn A Right Turn?
    The Semiotic Turn and A.J. Greimas from
    Configurations, Vol.2 (1994) 119-136.
    http//www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/TimLenoir/Semioti
    cTurn.html
  • The semiotic square is the elementary structure
    of signification http//www.cla.purdue.edu/english
    /theory/narratology/modules/greimassquare.html

16
Roman Jakobson
  • Roman Osipovich Jakobson (October 11, 1896 - July
    18, 1982) was a Russian thinker who became one of
    the most influential linguists of the 20th
    century by pioneering the development of
    structural analysis of language, poetry, and art.
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Jakobson

17
Model of communication
Jakobson distinguishes six communication
functions, each associated with a dimension of
the communication process Dimensions 1
context 2 message 3 sender --------------- 4
receiver 5 channel 6 code Functions 1
referential ( contextual information) 2 poetic
( autotelic) 3 emotive ( self-expression) 4
conative ( vocative or imperative addressing of
receiver) 5 phatic ( checking channel working)
6 metalingual ( checking code working)
18
Eco
19
Assignment
  • Topic Modern semioticians. Choose one or more
    semioticians.
  • Compile a text from the internet search results,
    including full bibliographic descriptions of the
    entries. Analyze the text and formulate your own
    opinion on the topic
  • Present it in a verbal and printed form during
    the seminar.
  • Due in two weeks

20
More readings
  • Introductions to semiotics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com