ENVE5103 Lecture 3b - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

ENVE5103 Lecture 3b

Description:

Anemometer height 10 m. The optional input of an anemometer height in place of the default height of 10 ... by any optionally entered anemometer height. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: denizk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ENVE5103 Lecture 3b


1
ENVE5103 Lecture 3b
  • Gaussian dispersion modelling as a screening tool
    in the Regulatory Framework.

2
DISPERSION MODELLING
  • The dispersion calculations for a single point
    source under a particular meteorology can be
    repeated for
  • multiple sources with additive effects
  • different meteorologies that might be expected at
    different times of the day or year

3
DISPERSION MODELLING - SCREENING
  • What is the worst possible scenario for a given
    source?
  • (What is the highest possible ground-level
    pollutant concentration?)
  • Under what conditions does it occur (stability,
    windspeed)
  • Where does it occur?
  • These questions require calculations with the
    many permutations possible.
  • Conservative estimates (I.e those leading to high
    concentrations) are used with relatively simple
    model equations

4
THE U.S. EPA SCREEN(3) MODEL
  • Maximum short term (1 hour) ground level
    concentrations (magnitude and location) downwind
    from a single source (point, line, area or
    volume)
  • Building downwash calculations with wake and
    cavity concentration estimates
  • Inversion break-up and shoreline fumigation
  • Plume rise for flare releases
  • Flat or Simple Elevated Terrain

5
SCREENING
  • Conservative estimates of averaging time
  • Original dispersion data are for 10 min averaging
  • Regulatory screening models (e,g, SCREEN) use
    these as 1 hour averaging results.
  • An estimate of the lower limit for mixing height
  • Multiple reflections off the ground and stable
    layer aloft
  • Zm hs 1 (m) when plume height gt Zm.
  • Worst case stability - wind speed combinations
  • Regardless of their likelihood to occur at the
    given location

6
  • ONTARIOS TIERED APPROACH FOR ASSESSING
    COMPLIANCE WITH AIRSTANDARDS GUIDELINES

7
ONTARIOS TIERED APPROACH FOR ASSESSING
COMPLIANCE WITH AIRSTANDARDS GUIDELINES
  • Tier 1 is a screening level analysis which
    includes all potential worst case meteorological
    conditions. If an air quality study passes
    appropriate standards and/or guidelines there is
    no need for additional modelling.
  • Tier 2 is a refined modelling analysis that makes
    use of regional meteorological data.
    Pre-processed regional meteorological data sets
    prepared by the Ontario Ministry of the
    Environment will be available to modellers

8
  • Tier 3 consists of refined modelling analyses
    that incorporate local meteorological data. This
    data typically must be pre-processed by the
    modeller or a Canadian meteorological data
    provider such as Environment Canada.
  • Local meteorological data sets include
    site-specific parameters and meteorological
    characteristics that directly represent the site
    of consideration with a greater level of detail
    than most regional data sets.

9
Ontario's Plan for Clean Air
  • two new regulations introduced in 2005
  • Regulation 194/05 Industry Emissions - Nitrogen
    Oxides and Sulphur Dioxide stricter (NOx) and
    (SO2) emission limits for industry
  • Regulation 419/05 Air Pollution - Local Air
    Quality new air standards, emission reporting and
    dispersion modelling tools to show compliance

10
Ontario's Plan for Clean AirGuideline documents
  • 3614e02 Procedure for Preparing an Emission
    Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report
  • 5165e Air Dispersion Modelling Guideline for
    Ontario (ADMGO)
  • 5166e Guideline for Implementation of Air
    Standards in Ontario (GIASO)
  • All available at
  • http//www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/air/regulations/
    localquality.htm

11
Model Input Data SCREEN3
  • Source type and characteristics (Point, Flare,
    Area or Volume)
  • Building Downwash If this option is used then
    building dimensions (height, length and width)
    must be specified.
  • Meteorology SCREEN3 can consider all conditions,
    or a specific stability class and wind speed can
    be provided.
  • Terrain SCREEN3 support flat, elevated and
    complex terrain. If elevated or complex terrain
    is used, distance and terrain heights must be
    provided.
  • Fumigation SCREEN3 supports shoreline
    fumigation. If used, distance to shoreline must
    be provided.

12
THE U.S. EPA SCREEN(3) MODEL Point source inputs
  • Emission rate (g/s)
  • Stack height (m)
  • Stack inside diameter (m)
  • Stack gas exit velocity (m/s) or
  • flow rate (ft3/min or m3/s)
  • Stack gas temperature (K)
  • Ambient temperature (K)
  • Receptor height above ground (may be used to
    define flagpole receptors) (m)
  • Urban/rural option (U urban, R rural)

13
THE U.S. EPA SCREEN(3) MODEL Meteorology Options
  • Full complete set of stability - wind speed
    combinations examined for worst case scenario at
    each downwind location
  • Stability class worst case scenarios for
    predetermined wind speeds
  • Stability class - wind speed combination
    calculations reported for only the combination
    specified by user

14
Table 2 SCREEN User Guide
  • Wind speed and stability class combinations used
    by SCREEN

15
THE U.S. EPA SCREEN(3) MODEL Fumigation Options
  • Inversion break-up (Figure 5-15 de Nevers)
  • - pollutant release into the radiation inversion
    layer moves horizontally with little dispersion
    due to the strong stability of the inversion
    layer
  • - radiation inversion starts breaking up
    mid-morning
  • - when mixed layer reaches stack height high
    ground level concentrations can be experienced
    close to the stack
  • shoreline fumigation (sources within 3000 m of a
    large body of water)

16
SCREEN3 Non-regulatory options
  • An alternative mixing height algorithm (Brode,
    1991).
  • optional input of an anemometer height in place
    of the default height of 10 meters.
  • an alternative building cavity algorithm
    (Schulman and Scire, 1993).

17
Brode algorithm for mixing height
  • The alternative mixing height is determined by
    using the maximum of a predetermined mixing
    height or a value adjusted slightly higher than
    the plume height, whichever is greater. Both the
    mixing height and adjustment values to the plume
    height are based on stability class. Selection of
    this algorithm results in concentrations that are
    generally more conservative than output from the
    ISCST3 model.

18
Anemometer height ? 10 m
  • The optional input of an anemometer height in
    place of the default height of 10 meters affects
    the stack top wind speeds for Choice of
    Meteorology selections 1 and 2.
  • For Choice of Meteorology selection 3, the user
    is prompted to enter a 10 meter wind speed which
    is unaffected by any optionally entered
    anemometer height.

19
Schulman and Scire Building Cavity Algorithm
  • The published concentration results using this
    algorithm model the sampled wind tunnel test
    concentrations better than the regulatory
    algorithm for the range selected.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com