Employment Law as it affects UK Charities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Employment Law as it affects UK Charities

Description:

Employment Law as it affects UK Charities. William Garnett. Bates Wells ... Ambit of consultation. The process. Requests - 10% Pre-existing arrangements 40 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: lple7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Employment Law as it affects UK Charities


1
Employment Law as it affects UK Charities
  • William Garnett
  • Bates Wells Braithwaite
  • Partner

2
Social Policy?
  • 1st April 1st October
  • The role of Tribunals
  • Statute/authorities/common law

3
Claim Profiles
  • Claims 2002/3 172,322
  • Claims 2003/4 197,365
  • Claims 2004/5 156,081
  • Growth areas
  • Sex discrimination
  • Equal pay
  • Pregnancy related claims
  • Religion or belief
  • Sexual orientation

4
Successful claims in the Tribunal 18
  • Dismissed at hearing 8
  • Unfair dismissal compensation
  • Over 50 were awarded compensation of less than
    4,000
  • A further 20 coming in the category of under
    8,000
  • A further 12 under 12,500
  • 5 coming in the category of between 30,000 and
    a maximum award of 56,800

5
  • Compensation for race discrimination
  • 20 under 2,000
  • 50 under 7,000
  • 10 at over 50,000
  • maximum award 170,953
  • Similar profiles for sex discrimination and
    disability discrimination

6
  • Costs Claimants were awarded costs in 281 cases
    and Respondents in 755 cases
  • Maximum award - 15,000
  • Average award - 1,828

7
Volunteers
  • Are they employees?
  • Are they entitled to the minimum wage?
  • Are they protected by the equal opportunities
    legislation?
  • Are you liable for their acts?

8
  • Is there?
  • An intention to create legal relations
  • Offer and acceptance
  • Consideration
  • If there is a contract, is it a contract of
    employment?
  • South East Sheffield Citizens Advice Bureau v-
    Grayson 2004
  • Melhuish v- Redbridge Citizens Advice Bureau
    2005

9
Agency Workers
  • Is the worker an employee of anyone?
  • Are they an employee of the agency?
  • Are they an employee of the organisation for
    which they are working?
  • Short term and long term relationships.

10
  • Dacas v- Brook Street 2004
  • Bunce v- Sky Blue 2005
  • RNLI v- Bushaway 2005
  • Leaky v- Shelter 2005

11
  • Look at the contractual terms between the agency
    and the individual
  • Look at the terms between yourself and the agency
  • Who is exercising control over this person?
  • How is the tax being dealt with?
  • What is their working pattern/history?

12
Sick Leave and Holiday Pay
  • Holiday pay under the contract?
  • Statutory holiday pay Working Time Regulations
    (20 days including Bank Holidays)
  • Statutory holiday during sick leave?
  • Does holiday accrue during sick leave?
  • Does it accrue during long term sick leave?
  • Can individuals take holiday whilst sick?
  • Do you need to review your contract?

13
Rolled up holiday pay
  • Is the sum identifiable in the hourly rate?
  • Is it an additional amount?
  • Caulfield Others v- Marshalls Clay Products
    Ltd 2004
  • Smith v- A J Morrisroes Sons 2004

14
Equal Opportunities Disability Discrimination
  • The current position
  • Physical or mental impairment which has a
    substantial and long term adverse effect on his
    ability to carry out normal day to day
    activities
  • Mental impairment includes an impairment
    resulting from a mental illness but the illness
    must be clinically well recognised
  • Progressive conditions need to show that their
    condition resulted in an impairment which
    substantially affects normal activities

15
  • Position as of 5th December
  • A mental illness will no longer need to be
    clinically well recognised.
  • People with progressive conditions HIV, cancer
    and MS will automatically be considered to have
    a disability

16
Practical effect?
  • How will this be dealt with in the Tribunal?
  • Value of expert reports

17
Changes 1.10.2004
  • Smaller employer exemption gone
  • New definition of direct discrimination
  • Reasonable adjustments widened from any
    arrangements to a provision criterion or
    practice bringing it into line with other
    discrimination legislation

18
  • Introduction of a new definition of harassment
  • A person subjects a disabled person to
    harassment where, for a reason which relates to
    the disabled persons disability, he engages in
    unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect
    of
  • Violating the disabled persons dignity or
  • Creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading,
    humiliating or offensive environment for him
  • Reasonableness caveat

19
  • Reponses to questionnaires 8 weeks
  • Burden or proof Where, on the hearing of a
    complaint, the complainant proves facts from
    which the Tribunal could conclude in the absence
    of an adequate explanation, that the Respondent
    has acted in a way which is unlawful under the
    DDA, the Tribunal must uphold the complaint
    unless the Respondent proves that he did not do
    so

20
  • Disability discrimination does not require equal
    treatment
  • The Act does not regard the differences between
    disabled people and others as irrelevant. It
    does not expect each to be treated in the same
    way. It expects reasonable adjustments to be
    made to cater for the special needs of disabled
    people. It necessarily entails an element of
    more favourable treatment. (Archibald v- Fife
    Council 2004). See also Miekle v-
    Nottinghamshire County Council 2004.

21
Age Discrimination
  • The regulations prohibit direct and indirect
    discrimination for reasons relating to age
  • This will apply to the young and the old.
  • It will be possible to justify a difference of
    treatment on the grounds of age if it can be
    shown that it fulfils a legitimate aim and the
    particular circumstances make it appropriate and
    necessary

22
  • Retirement ages 65 no unfair dismissal claims
  • Over 65 protection from unfair dismissal,
    unless given 6 and 12 months notice of a
    retirement date, in so far as the dismissal is by
    reason of retirement.
  • Dismissals for other reasons fully protected.

23
  • Redundancy calculations will lose the age
    enhancement but maintain the service enhancement
    for the purposes of the calculation
  • Length of service benefits, under 5 years will
    continue
  • Over 5 years - limited circumstances in which
    lawful

24
Sex Discrimination
  • New definition of indirect sex discrimination
    coming into line with the other statutes
  • New definition of harassment
  • Confirmation that less favourable treatment on
    the grounds of pregnancy or maternity leave
    constitutes sex discrimination

25
  • 8 week time limit for questionnaires
  • St Helens MBC v- Derbyshire 2005
  • North Western Health Board v- McKenna 2005

26
Race Discrimination
  • On racial grounds. See
  • Redfern v- Serco Ltd 2005
  • Inferences see Dattani v- Chief Constable of
    Western Mercia Police 2005

27
TUPE
  • New legislation is expected to come into force on
    6th April 2006
  • The present situation covers
  • Economic entity
  • Which retains its identity post transfer
  • New proposals
  • Service provision change where exclusive to one
    client

28
  • Obligation to notify transferee of identity of
    employees
  • Increased rights for insolvency
  • Practitioners to terminate and vary contracts

29
Pensions Act 2004
  • Previously pensions excluded from TUPE
  • Pensions now include via the Act for transfers
    occurring after April 2005
  • Regardless of pre-transfer scheme, the new
    employer must either match the transferors
    scheme or contribute up to 6 of pay, whichever
    is lower

30
Information and Consultation Regulations
  • Regulations came in on 6th April 2005 applying
    to businesses of 150 or more employees
  • Will be extended in April 2007 for businesses of
    100 employees and to businesses with 50 employees
    by April 2008

31
  • Ambit of consultation
  • The process
  • Requests - 10
  • Pre-existing arrangements 40
  • Information and consultation not a problem,
    engage in the process

32
Statutory dismissal, disciplinary and grievance
procedures
  • Into force 1st October 2004
  • Dismissal and disciplinary procedures
    procedure applies on any dismissal for any
    reason.
  • Three stage process letter, hearing, appeal
  • Less than a years service?
  • The modified procedure for gross misconduct

33
  • Consequences of non-compliance increase or
    decrease of between 10 and 50 and the dismissal
    is automatically unfair

34
Statutory Grievance Procedure
  • For any claim to be pursued in the Tribunal the
    employee must bring a grievance query
    constructive dismissal
  • Three stage process complaint, hearing, appeal
  • Jurisdiction and adjustment of awards

35
Unfair Dismissal
  • Variation to contracts see Richardson v- Scott
    Co 2005

36
Human Rights
  • The relevance of the convention rights as between
    an individual and a private employer have been
    the subject of recent consideration. See X v- Y
    2004, Copsey v- WWB Devon Clays Ltd 2005
  • Organ of last resort?

37
National Minimum Wage
  • Variations in rates 1st October 2005 adults
    5.10
  • Young workers 4.25
  • Accommodation allowances 3.90 per day
  • Residential care workers and on call workers
    relationship with Working Time Regulations?

38
  • William Garnett
  • Head of Employment
  • Bates Wells Braithwaite
  • 2-6 Cannon Street
  • London EC4M 6YH
  • Tel 020 7551 7720
  • Email w.garnett_at_bateswells.co.uk

39
Slide title
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com