LESA_EHNC_20040517'ppt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

LESA_EHNC_20040517'ppt

Description:

... compliance to Wal-Mart's mandate can be achieved by a process of 'slap and ship' ... Member, EPCglobal HAG (UHFGen2) and BAG ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: craigk4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LESA_EHNC_20040517'ppt


1
(No Transcript)
2
The Emperor has No Clothes!!
  • Craig K. Harmon
  • 17 May 2004
  • Logistics Execution Systems Association (LESA)

3
1 January 2005 . . .
  • Some industry pundits have claimed that
    compliance to Wal-Mart's mandate can be achieved
    by a process of "slap and ship". Wal-Mart will
    accept a read rate of 70 to 85. I don't think
    so! RF tag orientation and placement must be
    based upon the packaging material onto which the
    RF tag is applied and the material contained
    within the packaging material onto which the RF
    tag is applied.
  • We are going to move pallets of 40 containers
    filled with (???) through the reader portal at 15
    mph and read all of the tags on each of the boxes
    on each of the pallets right? I don't think so!
    A rationale approach to data management needs to
    be considered immediately. If you truly want the
    EPCs of each of the boxes on the pallet you need
    a higher functionality tag than a simple 96-bit
    EPC on the pallet.

4
Physics and God
5
. . . 1 January 2005
  • Oh . . . the data already will be in our database
    because of advance receipt of this data through
    either XML or ASC X12 transmissions. Why do we
    believe that Ship Notice/Manifest EDI (ANS
    X12.856) or XML will somehow be more widely
    implemented with RFID than with bar codes?
  • Where are the recommendations for what happens if
    we are unable to read an RF tag do we key in 96
    1s and 0s?
  • Neither the existing Class 0 or Class 1 tags meet
    the DOD requirements. So where do they go next?
  • Both Wal-Mart and DOD have claimed a preference
    for Class 1 Version 2 (now referred to as
    Generation 2 - Gen 2). Where is this
    specification and why is it being postponed until
    AT LEAST September 2004?

6
Q.E.D. Systems Craig K. Harmon President
Visit our web sites http//www.qed.org and
http//www.autoid.org
  • Team Leader, RFID Experts Group (REG) (formerly
    VAG)
  • Chair, U.S. TAG to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 31/WG 4
    RFID
  • Chair, ASC MH 10/SC 8/WG 4, RFID for Returnable
    Containers
  • Chair, ISO TC 122/WG 4 (Shipping Labels) ISO TC
    122/WG 7 (Product Packaging)
  • Chair, ISO TC 122/104 JWG - Supply Chain
    Applications of RFID
  • Vice-chair, ASC MH 10 and U.S. TAG to ISO TC 122
    (Packaging)
  • Senior Project Editor ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 31/WG 4/SG
    3 (RFID - Air Interface - 18000)
  • Member, EPCglobal HAG (UHFGen2) and BAG
  • Past Chair, ASC INCITS T6 (RFID) - ANS INCITS
    2561999, 2001
  • JTC 1/SC 31 Liaison Officer to the International
    Telecommunications Union (ITU-R)
  • JTC 1/SC 31 Liaison Officer to the International
    Air Transport Association (IATA)
  • JTC 1/SC 31 Liaison to the European
    Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)
  • ASC MH 10/SC 8 Liaison Universal Postal Union
    (UPU) Physical Encoding Group (PEG)
  • Advisor and Member of USPS Strategic Technology
    Council
  • ISO TC 104 (Freight Containers / RFID) Liaison
    Officer to JTC 1/SC 31
  • Project Editor, ISO 18185 (Freight Containers -
    Electronic Container Seal Protocol)
  • Chairman Project Editor, ANS MH10.8.2 (Data
    Application Identifiers)
  • Vocabulary Rapporteur to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 31
  • Co-chair, HIBCC Automatic Identification
    Technical Committee (AITC)

7
The Hype has everyone excited but few are yet
attempting to manage expectations. . . The
World will not implement on 1 January 2005!!!
8
RFID Experts GroupTerms of Reference . . .
  • 1. Technology selection guidelines based on usage
    parameters
  • How far
  • How fast
  • How many
  • How much
  • Applied to what and the contents of the container
  • 2. With multiple readers in a network, guidance
    to
  • minimize overlapping reader signals of adjacent
    systems,
  • ensure that the aggregated data from each reader
    system is correct
  • handle / communicate with the variety of tags
    being placed before the reader, multi-protocol,
    multi-frequency readers
  • define the interface to peripheral control
    mechanisms

9
RFID Experts Group . . . Terms of Reference . . .
  • 3. Tag and label issues
  • Placement guidance
  • Tags and inserts active and passive
  • Application to plastic, cardboard, plywood, free
    space, metal
  • Orientation guidance
  • Based on tag antenna type
  • Determined by reader / antenna guidance
  • Label design
  • Label material and adhesive guidance for specific
    surface onto which tag mounted
  • Determined by reader / antenna guidance
  • 4. Data aggregation / singulation / deaggregation
  • provide guidance on how to provide the greatest
    assurance that all tags presented to the reader
    are read

10
RFID Experts Group . . . Terms of Reference . .
.
  • 5. Safety and regulatory
  • With respect to frequency, power, duty cycle,
    and radiation levels, guidance on human exposure
    limitations, to include
  • HERO
  • HERF
  • HERP
  • ICNIRP
  • Intrinsically safe
  • 6. Security and privacy
  • With respect to tag to reader, reader to host,
    and host to computing system, guidance on
    security and privacy and how to achieve the same
  • FIPS 140
  • Privacy guidelines

11
RFID Experts Group . . . Terms of Reference
  • 7. Backup. With respect to RF tags, guidance on
    procedures to be undertaken if one or more tags
    are unable to be read
  • Secure business process / implementation group
    representative
  • 8. Sensors/Transducers
  • SAL-C . . . IEEE 1451
  • Sensor interface. With respect to higher
    functionality tags guidance on the implementation
    of sensor technology input.
  • How do I know with which tag I am communicating

12
RFID Experts Group Phase II Issues
  • 9. Rogue tags
  • With respect to transmitted bits and ubiquitous
    implementation, guidance on how one ensures that
    the tag being read is for the application
    intended.
  • 10. Tag to tag communications and networking

13
Issues on RFID
  • EPCglobal or ISO
  • Intellectual Property
  • WTO
  • Frequencies
  • Item identification v. anti-counterfeiting
  • Interoperability (Class 1 Class 0) - Supply
    chain

14
Standards
15
Types of Standards
  • ? Technology (Symbology, RFID, I.C. Card)
  • ? Data Content (DIs, AIs, Syntax)
  • ? Conformance (Print Quality, Test
    Specifications)
  • ? Application Standards (Ship Label, Product
    Package)

16
Application StandardsRadio Frequency
Identification Open Standards
  • ISO 10374 - Freight containers Automatic
    identification
  • ISO 18185 - Freight Containers - Radio-frequency
    communication protocol for electronic seal
  • ISO 11785 - Radio-frequency identification of
    animals Technical concept
  • ANSI MH10.8.4 - RFID for Returnable Containers
  • AIAG B-11 - Tire Wheel Identification Standard
  • EAN.UCC GTAG
  • ISO 122/104 JWG - Supply Chain Applications of
    RFID
  • ISO 17358 - Application Requirements
  • ISO 17363 - Freight Containers
  • ISO 17364 - Returnable Transport Items
  • ISO 17365 - Transport Units
  • ISO 17363 - Product Packaging
  • ISO 17364 - Product Tagging

17
Application Requirements
  • Wal-Mart - Suppliers will mark inbound cases and
    pallets with RFID - 1 January 2005 - May, 2003
    specification calls for 256 bit read/write tag
  • U.S. Department of Defense - 2nd Draft RFID
    policy presented on 20 February 2003 - To issue
    final policy in July of 2004 that will require
    suppliers to put passive RFID tags on selected
    case/pallet packaging by January of 2005. -
    Policy will call for passive tag (est. 256 byte)
    and active tag

18
EPCEPCglobalan agency of UCC and EAN
19
MIT AutoID Center
  • Officially began 1 October 1999
  • Initially funded by Uniform Code Council, The
    Gillette Company and Procter and Gamble
  • Split into AutoID Lab at MIT and EPCglobal under
    UCC and EAN (http//www.epcglobalinc.org/ and
    http//www.epcglobalus.org/) in Q3 2003
  • Software components
  • Object Naming Service (ONS)
  • Savant
  • Product Markup Language (PML)
  • Air interface protocols
  • 860 - 930 MHz
  • 13.56 MHz
  • Supply chain impact studies
  • Field trials
  • Intellectual Property

20
EPC - Network vs. Code
The globally unique identifier that serves as a
pointer for making enquiries about the item it
identifies
21
EPC Class I - V
22
EPC - How it works
23
EPCglobal
Architecture Review Committee
24
EPC-96 Structure
  • Class 0 - 64 bits
  • Class 1 - 96 bits
  • Class 1 G2 - 128/256 bits
  • Class 2 - Class 1 with larger memory and
    read/write
  • Class 3 - Class 2 with sensors (semi-passive)
  • Class 4 - Active tags

25
EPCglobal or ISO
  • ISO 18000, Part 6 (860 - 960 MHz) published
    5/31/4
  • ISO 18000, Part 7 (433 MHz) published 5/31/4
  • EPCglobal has four competing camps

26
EPCglobal
  • A joint venture between EAN International and UCC
  • The story of UCC and EAN
  • Spent too much money on UCCnet and looking for
    revenue sources
  • Without sale of numbers, questionable value
    proposition for EPCglobal
  • Mishandled Class 1 Gen 2

27
Wal-Mart DoD
28
Wal-Mart Information Systems
  • Wal-Marts information systems are largely
    integrated
  • Wal-Marts legacy data structures are GTINs
    (U.P.C./EAN), GLNs (Location Codes), GRAI/GIAIs
    (Asset IDs), and SSCCs (Transportation Control
    Codes)
  • Such legacy data structures serve as the primary
    keys to Wal-Marts systems
  • These are the data structures supported by
    EPCglobal (particularly, Class 0 and Class I v1,
    and Class I G2)
  • Wal-Mart will not require a major change to their
    information systems to implement EPC

29
DOD Information Systems
  • The Department of Defense has numerous logistics
    systems
  • These systems are fed by legacy data structures,
    notably, NATO/National Stock Numbers, CAGE/NCAGE
    codes, DoDAACs, and TCNs
  • Such legacy data structures serve as the primary
    keys to DOD systems

30
DOD is not Wal-Mart
  • While DOD can take advantage of the Wal-Mart
    initiatives, their business processes differ
  • Where Wal-Mart will require little modification
    to their information systems, DODs modifications
    would be substantial
  • Wal-Marts data structures can easily be
    converted from EPC (EPC-ready) DODs cannot

31
DOD Unique Identification (UID)
  • A world-wide unique identification of items
  • Typically consists
  • Enterprise ID (Company code)
  • Product code (may not be required where the
    serial number is unique within the enterprise)
  • Serial number
  • May be discrete or concatenated fields
  • Under ISO definition, this code may be up to 50
    characters in length

http//www.acq.osd.mil/uid/
32
DoD Policy (as of 1 March 2004)
  • Latest draft 20 February 2004
  • Active
  • Freight containers, air pallets
  • 433.92 MHz/18000-7/Savi
  • Passive
  • Returnable Transport Item
  • Product Packaging
  • EPC 860 - 960 MHz
  • Preference for Class 1 G2 (now Gen 2)
  • 64-bit Class 0 v1 (WORM) / Matrics
  • 96-bit Class 1 v1 (ReadOnly) / Alien

33
EPCglobal Note (as of 1 May 2004)
  • Active
  • In the AutoID Centre hierarchy, active would be a
    Class 3 or high tag. No work has been done in
    EPCglobal.
  • Minimum attention to data issues
  • Passive
  • Mixed results on Class 1 and Class 0
  • Data issues Class 1 and Class 2 (fixed and
    limited structures) EPCglobal Tag Data Format
    v1.24 is seriously flawed.
  • 5/5/4 - EPCglobal halts work on Class 0 and 1
    compliance/certification (no equipment meets
    spec)
  • Need a header for UID for other Registration
    Authorities

34
EPC-256 Data Structure
w with (1) or without (0) part number x for
future use (other demographics)
88432 52 bits (leaving 204 bits for Part
Number Serial Number) (ab 204)
35
DOD Supply Transportation Data
36
Intellectual Property
37
Intellectual Property
  • Public domain, royalty-free, or RAND
  • All ISO standards are RAND
  • All EPCglobal royalty-free (I dont think so!!)
  • If royalty-free for Gen2 . . . not necessarily
    for Class 0 and Class 1
  • If royalty-free for Unified . . . not necessarily
    for Performance, Q, or FlexWorks
  • Notices of infringement

38
World Trade Organization (WTO)
39
WTO Multilateral Agreements On Trade In
GoodsTechnical Barriers
  • Clause 2.4Where technical regulations are
    required and relevant international standards
    exist or their completion is imminent, Members
    shall use them, or the relevant parts of them, as
    a basis for their technical regulations except
    when such international standards or relevant
    parts would be an ineffective or inappropriate
    means for the fulfillment of the legitimate
    objectives pursued, for instance because of
    fundamental climatic or geographical factors or
    fundamental technological problems.
  • Clause 3.4
  • Members shall not take measures which require or
    encourage local government bodies or
    nongovernmental bodies within their territories
    to act in a manner inconsistent with the
    provisions of Article 2.
  • Clause 3.5
  • Members are fully responsible under this
    Agreement for the observance of all provisions of
    Article 2. Members shall formulate and implement
    positive measures and mechanisms in support of
    the observance of the provisions of Article 2 by
    other than central government bodies.

40
WTO Multilateral Agreements On Trade In
GoodsTechnical Barriers
  • Clause 5.4
  • In cases where a positive assurance is required
    that products conform with technical regulations
    or standards, and relevant guides or
    recommendations issued by international
    standardizing bodies exist or their completion is
    imminent, Members shall ensure that central
    government bodies use them, or the relevant parts
    of them, as a basis for their conformity
    assessment procedures, except where, as duly
    explained upon request, such guides or
    recommendations or relevant parts are
    inappropriate for the Members concerned, for,
    inter alia, such reasons as national security
    requirements the prevention of deceptive
    practices protection of human health or safety,
    animal or plant life or health, or the
    environment fundamental climatic or other
    geographical factors fundamental technological
    or infrastructural problems.

41
Frequencies
42
Which Technology
  • How far?
  • How fast?
  • How many?
  • How much?
  • Geometry of tagging space
  • Interferers (physical and radio)

43
How far, how fast, how much, how many, attached
to what?
44
Minimum Requirements
Note While minimums are stated, supply chain
applications are common for passive tags at 256
bytes and active tags at 128 kBytes
45
Recent Developments
  • 860 - 960 MHz
  • Industrial, Scientific, Medical (ISM) band
  • Originally 902 - 928 MHz Spread Spectrum in the
    U.S.
  • Technology enhancement (frequency agile) permits
  • 902 - 928 MHz used in Region 2 (U.S.)
  • 865.6 - 867.6 MHz nearing finalization in Region
    1 (Europe)
  • 950 - 956 MHz regulations in process in Region 3
    (Japan)
  • 910 - 914 MHz regulations in process in Region 3
    (Korea)
  • Gen2 may support agreed upon modifications to
    18000-6 (18000-6)
  • 18000-6 may be modified based on agreement of
    EPC Gen2

46
Recent Developments
  • 433 MHz
  • ISM band permitted by ITU (implemented in Region
    1 but for different parameters in Regions 2 and
    3)
  • ITU receptive to Regions 2 and 3 supporting
    Region 1 for a 433 MHz allocation for freight
    containers
  • Chairman of ISO TC 104 (Freight containers) has
    made request to ITU and WCO to embrace both
    passive (860 - 960) and active (433.92 MHz)
    calling out 18000-6 and 18000-7
  • Under serious consideration in both Japan and
    Korea
  • Both Japan and Korea have requested U.S.
    governmental letters of support, i.e., FCC, NTIA,
    DoD, NATO
  • Received support through new (April 2004) FCC
    rules, specific to RFID, that increases both
    power and duty cycle.

47
Item Identificationversus Anti-Counterfeiting
48
Interoperability
49
Compatibility
Compatibility Suitability of products, processes
or services for use together under specific
conditions to fulfill relevant requirements
without causing unacceptable interactions.
Interchangeability, interoperability, and
non-interference are differing levels (or
degrees) of compatibility. Interchangeability The
condition that exists between devices or systems
that exhibit equivalent functionality, interface
features and performance to allow one to be
exchanged for another, without alteration, and
achieve the same operational service. Interoperab
ility The condition that exists between systems,
from different vendors, to execute bi-directional
data exchange functions, in a manner that allows
them to operate effectively together. A guarantee
of a certain level of compatibility between
different implementations of the same standard.
The desired level of compatibility is specific to
a given standard, and can be limited to basic
services. Interconnection and interoperability
are the main objectives of standardization.
Non-interference The condition that exists
where standard-compliant components of various
types or of different vendor origins co-exist
within the same space without serious detrimental
effect on one anothers performance. Components
are not required to communicate with one another
as part of a common infrastructure, but only to
peacefully co-exist.
50
The Layers of Logistic Units (Optically Readable
Media)
Layer 5ISO TC 204 (None)AIAG B-15
Movement Vehicle (truck, airplane, ship, train)
Layer 4ISO TC 104 (None)
Container (e.g., 40 foot Sea Container)
Layer 3ISO TC 122/WG 4 (15394)ANS MH10.8.1AIAG
B-10/14EIA 556-BUCC 6 / Genl EAN Spec
Layer 2ISO TC 122/WG 4 (15394)ANS MH10.8.1AIAG
B-10/14EIA 556-BUCC 6 / Genl EAN Spec
Layer 1ISO TC 122/WG 7 (22742) ANS MH10.8.6AIAG
B-4 EIA 621/624 IEC 62090 UCC 1 / Genl EAN Spec
Layer 0ISO TC 122 (TBD)ANS MH10.8.7AIAG
B-4EIA SP-3497UCC 1 / Genl EAN Spec
51
The Layers of Logistic Units (Radio Frequency
Identification - RFID)
Layer 5
Movement Vehicle (truck, airplane, ship, train)
Layer 4 (433 MHz, 860-960 MHz)ISO 17363
Container (e.g., 40 foot Sea Container)
Layer 3 (433 MHz, 860-960 MHz)ISO 17364
Unit Load Pallet
Unit Load Pallet
Layer 2 (860-960 MHz)ISO 17365
Transport Unit
Transport Unit
Transport Unit
Transport Unit
Layer 1 (860-960 MHz) ISO 17366
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
Layer 0 (860-960 MHz) (13.56 MHz under
consideration) ISO 17367
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
52
Markets
  • Cases, returnables, RTIs, freight containers
  • AIAG B-11 being re-opened
  • FDA and pharmaceuticals
  • HIBCC and med/surg devices
  • Container seals
  • Smart shelves not ready for prime time
  • Product tagging not ready for prime time

53
EPCglobal ISO . . .
54
. . . EPCglobal ISO . . .
55
. . . EPCglobal ISO
56
The Hype Cycle
Visibility
Peak of Inflated Expectations
Plateau of Productivity
Slope of Enlightenment
Trough of Disillusionment
Technology Trigger
Time
Source Jackie Fenn, Gartner Group
57
Predictions / Recommendations
  • 860 - 960 MHz (passive) - 433 MHz (active)
  • DoD implement 18000-6, pushing EPCglobal to ISO
  • Within EPCglobal Unified air interface to
    become Generation 2
  • Wal-Mart realizes ISO / WTO recommendations
    should drive their standards
  • Initial confusion within FDA regarding RFID for
    anti-counterfeiting. Many recommendations for
    13.56 MHz though the right answer is 860-960 MHz
  • IMO / WCO support for 433 MHz container seals
  • RFID Market CAGR through 2009 - 30-35

58
???
59
Thank you!!!
60
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com