Review for the Final: I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Review for the Final: I

Description:

Llad Phillips. 3 ... Llad Phillips. 6. Conclusions. Causal conditions continue ... James Q. Wilson and Glenn C. Loury. Father's Income. R. J ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: UCSB6
Learn more at: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu
Category:
Tags: final | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review for the Final: I


1
Review for the Final I
  • Concepts and Analytics

2
Part ICoordinating the Components of the
Criminal Justice SystemPart IIThe Serious
Offender
3
Questions About Crime
  • Can we explain trends in crime and trends in
    expenditure on the criminal justice system?
  • What is the right mix of enforcement and
    corrections?

4
(No Transcript)
5
Schematic of the Criminal Justice System
The Driving Force
Causes ?!!
Weak Link
Offense Rate Per Capita
Crime Generation
Expected Cost of Punishment
(detention, deterrence)
Expenditures
Crime Control
6
Conclusions
  • Causal conditions continue to get worse
  • As a consequence we have to spend more real
    dollars per person to keep crime levels from
    rising
  • Crime acts like a tax
  • Californians spend 450 (1992) per person on
    criminal justice to keep things from getting worse

7
Question
  • What happened around 1980 to differentiate the
    50s, 60s, and 70s from the 80s and 90s?
  • was there a change in behavior?
  • was there a change in policy?

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Law Enforcement
Prosecution
Courts
Public Defense
State Prisons
Other Corrections
11
Abstraction (Model) of the Criminal Justice System
New Admits
Enforcement Prosecution Defense Courts
State Prisons
Mean Years Served
12
Tradeoff Between Criminal Justice System Outputs
Admits per Year per capita
?
average years served
tan ?? admits per year per capita/average years
served
13
Capital constraint
  • admits per capita per year average years served
    prisoners per capita
  • Prisoners per capita is limited by prison
    capacity
  • If you increase admits per capita per year, then
    average years served decreases until prison
    capacity catches up

14
(No Transcript)
15
Coordinating CJS
Constraint Admits per yearAverage years served
Prisoners
Admits per Year
45 degrees
Average Years Served
16
A Shifting Mix In Criminal Justice System Outputs
Facts 1. spend more 2. Admit more 3. shorter time
served
????
Admits per Year per capita, AD
????
Prison Capacity Constraint
?
?
average years served, S
tan ?? admits per year per capita/average years
served
17
1994
1986
1952
1975
18
Part II
  • The Serious Offender
  • a few serious criminals account for most crimes
  • if free, each serious offender would commit
    crimes at the rate of ??per year
  • if there are N serious offenders, they would
    commit ?N offenses per year, if free
  • if there are PR serious offenders in prison, then
    we save ?PR offenses per year
  • the net observed offenses per year is
  • OF ?N - ?PR ?(N -ADS)

19
Serious Offenders, N
Prisoners, PR
Population
20
Serious Offenders, N
Prisoners, PR
Population
If the Serious Offender Population grows faster
than the Prison Population then crime gets worse
21
Likelihood of Going to Prison in a Lifetime
For Newborn
1/4
1/6
1/10
1/23
Source
Prevalence of Imprisonment in the U. S.
Population, 1974-01
22
Social Control
Population
In
Formerly In 10
23
(No Transcript)
24
Social Control of Citizenry
  • Civil law and authority
  • First line of defense moral compliance and good
    citizenship
  • Second line of defense deterrence (the threat of
    punishment)
  • Third line of defense detention
  • Martial law and authority
  • Fourth line of defense National Guard and the
    Army

25
100
Percent Control
Riot
99
98
Martial Law
Civil Law
Moral Compliance
Deterrence
Detention
National Guard
26
Is Criminal Justice Just?
27
Questions About Crime
  • Are there Inequities by Income class?
  • for victims?
  • Are there ethnic or racial injustices?
  • for victims?
  • for offenders?

28
(No Transcript)
29
US Family Income, 1994
Source US Statistical Abstract
30
Why is Income Distributed So Unevenly?
  • Labor Income is Unevenly Distributed
  • Part-time work
  • less than 50 weeks per year
  • less than 36 hours per week

31
(No Transcript)
32
Victimization Rates by Income Class
Source Report to the Nation on Crime and
Justice, Second edition
33
(No Transcript)
34
Census Tracts in Towns in the Boston Area
Housing Value
Crime
Zoned for Lots gt 25,000 Sq. Ft.
35
Public Goods and Private Goods
  • Private Goods
  • consumption uses them up
  • what you eat is not available to nourish others
  • Public Goods
  • consumption does not use them up
  • national defense
  • safe streets
  • educated citizenry

36
How Much Government Should There Be?
What is the right mix of public goods and private
goods?
Private Goods
Too Few Public Goods
Optimal Mix
Slope of the Production PossibilityFrontier Marg
inal Cost of Public Goods Marginal Cost of
Private Goods
Public?Goods
37
The Family and Delinquency
38
The Family and Delinquency
  • What is the role of the family in causing or
    preventing delinquency?
  • How important is the family in considering
    possible causes of delinquency?

39
Source Glenn C. Loury, Ch 1 of Families,
Schools, and Delinquency Prevention, eds.
James Q. Wilson and Glenn C. Loury
40
If the father is sufficiently altruistic, then
the daughters enlightened self-interest is to
prefer point A, and she can be induced to
behave in a cooperative way, allowing point J
that leads to point A
Daughters Income
A

R
J
Fathers Income
41
(No Transcript)
42
Where does Criminal Justice go from here?
  • California
  • Strong economy leads to lower property crime
    rates
  • Higher imprisonment rates lead to lower rates of
    violent crime
  • National Policy
  • Drug treatment programs
  • Eisenhower Report(1999) More Prevention

43
Rearrest rates for CA prison Inmates rise to 67
within 3 years after release.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com