TRANSIMS Current Status - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TRANSIMS Current Status

Description:

Portland Track 2. Activity-based tours with network microsimulation ... Three stage approach in Portland. Use ICR-VDF for initial simulation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Fre986
Learn more at: https://www.ampo.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRANSIMS Current Status


1
TRANSIMS Current Status
  • Frederick W. Ducca
  • FHWA
  • September 8, 2005

2
TRANSIMS Topics
  • Status of Portland Study
  • Lessons learned
  • Challenges
  • Other Applications
  • Costs
  • Open Source

3
Portland Study
  • Track 1 Network Simulation
  • Use networks travel demand from trip-based
    model
  • Route and microsimulate individual trips for
    entire region
  • Track 2 (Gen2) Full model
  • Tour model replaces trip based demand
  • Integrates tour model with network simulation

4
Conceptual Framework
Trip Tables
Attraction Balancing
Route Attributes
Population Synthesis
Activity Times and Locations
Mode Preference
Router
Microsimulator
Stabilization
Refine Modes
Change Activity Times or Patterns
5
Portland Size of Problem
  • Regional simulation using existing network and
    trip tables (Track 1)
  • 24 hours
  • 4,900,000 trips
  • 28,814 activity locations
  • 1,370 signals
  • 1260 zones
  • 8375 links
  • 250 transit routes

6
Portland Track 1
  • Completed simulations
  • Sensitivity testing
  • Change signal timing
  • Bridge closing
  • System reliability
  • 15 traffic growth
  • Reasonable responses

7
Portland Track 2
  • Activity-based tours with network microsimulation
  • Simulate the activities and movements of
    individuals, vehicles and households
  • Second by second over 24 hour period
  • Model the location, duration and type of
    activities

8
Track 2 Current Status
  • Calibrated and validated tour and destination
    choice models
  • Specified mode choice model and partially
    calibrated
  • Specified model feedback mechanisms

9
Lessons Learned
  • Start with existing data
  • Evolve from existing models
  • Equilibration and convergence
  • Different complexities
  • New opportunities
  • Testing and validation

10
Start with Existing Data
  • Used available network and trip tables from
    Portland
  • Utilities to translate and augment network
  • Trip tables
  • Pocket lanes
  • Signal timing
  • Transit schedules
  • Do NOT need all streets

11
Start with Existing Data, But
  • Need to refine translated networks
  • Major or unique network elements
  • Simulations are sensitive to data specification
    coding errors
  • Local link problems become system problems due to
    queue spillback
  • Developed utilities to diagnose and correct
    network problems

12
Evolve from existing models
  • Track 1 used existing trip tables as input to
    microsimulator
  • Added a layer on 4-step approach
  • Track 2 used existing destination choice mode
    choice model elements

13
Equilibration and Convergence
  • Route microsimulate whole trips
  • Methods generally similar to iterative capacity
    restraint
  • Three stage approach in Portland
  • Use ICR-VDF for initial simulation
  • Minimize path differences iterating between
    router microsimulation until gap criteria are
    met
  • Iterate towards a Nash equilibrium by re-routing
    sets of individual travelers until gap criteria
    are met

14
New Opportunities
  • All model components work with continuous time
  • Different modeling tools
  • Evaluate travel schedule, routes and simulation
    results for each traveler
  • Feedback sets of travelers to refine and improve
    choices

15
Testing and validation
  • Validate using available information
  • ALL traditional validation measures
  • New measures (ATR data)
  • Sensitivity tests
  • Demand, capacity, traffic control

16
Challenges
  • How to communicate results
  • Wealth of data
  • How to analyze
  • What to analyze
  • How to visualize
  • What do we tell people
  • Future No-Build scenarios cant ignore high
    demand/capacity situation

17
Additional Applications
  • New Jersey
  • Middlesex and Monmouth Counties
  • Congestion mobility
  • Rutgers University with NJIT
  • DC core
  • White House vicinity
  • Response to street closings
  • FHWA

18
Cost Trends
  • New study costs running significantly below
    original estimates
  • Computer hardware much cheaper
  • Use existing data and translation utilities
  • Known problems and available fixes
  • Must still use Linux

19
Computing Requirements
Cray supercomputer
Linux cluster
20
Open Source Licensing
  • NASA Open Source Agreement
  • Very similar to a well-known license
  • Commercialization-friendly
  • Initial products covered
  • TRANSIMS source code docs
  • TRANSIMS fundamentals textbook
  • Application utilities
  • Data sets

21
Open Source Information
  • Open Source Institute
  • http//www.opensource.org
  • NASA open source agreement 1.3
  • TMIP website
  • http//tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/transims
  • TRANSIMS listserv
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com