Burt Krain, Ph D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Burt Krain, Ph D

Description:

MPTE ORLANDO. May 5, 2005. Total Force. Competency Development. OCCUPATIONAL. INDUSTRY ... Jobs or positions have technical competencies, war fighting competencies, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: burton1
Category:
Tags: burt | krain

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Burt Krain, Ph D


1
Total Force Competency Development
  • Burt Krain, Ph D Lisa Gabel, MS
  • MPTE ORLANDO
  • May 5, 2005

2
Framework
OCCUPATIONAL
INDUSTRY (Military)
FOUNDATIONAL
Krain and Gabel (2008)
3
What is a Competency?
  • An observable, measurable pattern of knowledge,
    skills, abilities, and other characteristics that
    an individual/team/unit needs to perform work
    roles or occupational functions successfully
  • Adapted from OPM
  • Knowledge, Skills, Abilities

Krain and Gabel (2008)
4
Why a Competency-based Approach?
  • Rapidly changing, team-oriented, and virtual
    organizations mean that the traditional
    definition of a job is increasingly rare
  • War with an adaptive enemy VADM J. Harvey
  • People might be in a job only a few months or on
    several teams at once, playing a different role
    in each. In these circumstances an appropriate
    approach is to define work through a set of
    competencies that underpin all the required roles

Krain and Gabel (2008)
5
Approach
  • Competencies Lead To
  • Performance-Based Organization
  • Alignment with Manning Concepts (e.g., LCS)
  • Supports Agility Requirements of QDR
  • Linked to Mission Goals (NMETs)/Organizational
    Strategy

Utilizes a library of Knowledge, Skills,
Abilities statements that can be generalized to
all of DoD
Krain and Gabel (2008)
6
Organizational vs. Individual
Organizational Competencies Capabilities
  • Unique factors that make an organization
    competitive
  • Provide potential access to a wide variety of
    markets
  • Make a significant contribution to the perceived
    customer benefit of the end product
  • Are difficult for competitors to imitate
  • For the Navy, examples include
  • SEALs
  • Undersea Warfare
  • Carrier Based Aviation

7
Technical Competencies
  • Technical Competencies describe the what
    needs to be performed or accomplished, the major
    work requirements
  • Related to being part of a profession
  • Jobs or positions have technical competencies,
    war fighting competencies, behavioral
    competencies
  • Related to the specialized aspects of work
    performed

Consider Technical Competencies Areas of
Expertise Relevant to the Job Domain
Krain and Gabel (2008)
8
Behavioral Competencies
  • Competencies that are described in observable and
    measurable terms that make employees
    particularly effective in their work, they
    describe the how needs to be performed or
    accomplished
  • - Qualities
  • - Attributes

Consider Behavioral Competencies Soft Skills
Krain and Gabel (2008)
9
Reliability Validity
Reliability 1. Are the results repeatable
when performed by a different person (s) or the
same person (s) at a different time? 2. Is there
internal consistency in each competency unit?
Validity Do the results measure or are they
representative of what they intend or purport
to measure? Is the competency job related?
  • Qualified Experts
  • Recent Fleet Experience (3-6 months)
  • Knowledge of work requirements (not only what is
    done but what is supposed to be done)

Krain and Gabel (2008)
10
Goodness of Competencies
Amount/Type of Review Indicates the Quality of
the Competencies
Krain and Gabel (2008)
11
Process Methodology
  • Requires multiple reviews of data to ensure
    reliability and validity of the work and worker
    elements
  • Examination of legacy/extant previously validated
    data and doctrine
  • Workforce planner initial review
  • Occupational experts initial review
  • Initial validation by expert panel via focus
    group (cluster sample to capture population
    variance)
  • Validation through increase in sample size
  • Industrial Psychologists with experience in job
    analysis competency modeling assemble/generate
    data for expert review
  • Data collection/sampling strategy is created for
    each profession/role

Krain and Gabel (2008)
12
Process Methodology cont.
  • Technical
  • Experts are asked to accept, reject, or modify
    the technical work requirements
  • Experts are asked to load the task, knowledge,
    skill, and ability statements to the technical
    work requirement
  • The content of the work requirement is validated
    using a content validity ratio
  • Experts provide ratings of
  • Importance, Frequency, Difficulty
  • Core vs. Specialty Skill
  • Where the requirement is learned
  • Percentage of time actually performing the work
    element
  • Current tends and future work requirements are
    analyzed

13
Process Methodology cont.
  • Behavioral
  • Experts review behavioral competencies
  • Via a card sort method and the utilization of 3
    filter questions determine the relevance of the
    competency to successful performance of technical
    work requirements
  • Behavioral Competencies have a definition
    behavioral anchors
  • Critical Incident (Flanagan) technique is
    utilized to define effective vs. ineffective
    instances of performance for BARS development

14
Structure
  • New concept for some who have performed job
    analysis in the past
  • Represents units or chunks the information

Competency Title
  • KSAs are attached for the entire unit

Description
Knowledge Skills Abilities
Tasks
Krain and Gabel (2008)
15
Competency Development Process
Quality Control
Assemble Data
Occupational Analysts
Legacy Data
10 days
Draft Competencies
Authoritative Competencies
Verified Competencies
Workforce Planners
Validated Competencies
Validate
SMEs
2.5 days
Data Warehouse
End Users
Krain and Gabel (2008)
16
Position Individual
Proficiency
Proficiency
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Krain and Gabel (2008)
17
Impact/Benefits
  • Standardized
  • Process
  • Taxonomy
  • Data Hierarchy
  • Provides Personnel Interoperability
  • Scientifically Validated
  • Aligned with NSPS
  • Data Warehouse
  • SME/Community Involvement Key
  • Time Commitment
  • 3- 6 months originally, renew once a year

Krain and Gabel (2008)
18
Questions?
19
Prioritization Process/ Communities of Interest
20
Prioritization Review
21
Prioritization Process Category Scoring
  • Criticality Composite
  • Risk
  • Skill/Complexity
  • Demand Signal/High turnover
  • Cost
  • Scope and Effect
  • Population Size

22
Prioritization Process Other Selective Factors
23
Example
24
Crosswalk Results
Mapped to
1442
545
Used as a means to reduce redundancies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com