The NSF ALADDIN Center Organization and Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

The NSF ALADDIN Center Organization and Management

Description:

... Possible PROBE topics (external speakers), upcoming events, status of PROBEs ... If there is enough interest from faculty at the lunch we encourage the formation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: guyble
Learn more at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The NSF ALADDIN Center Organization and Management


1
The NSF ALADDIN Center Organization and
Management
2
Personnel
Faculty 8 Faculty summer
Co-directors Guy Blelloch Lenore Blum
Postdocs (one at CMU) Adam Meyerson (02-03) Jason
Hartline (Fall 03) Harald Racke (Spring 03) Eran
Halperin? (03-04)
Administrator Susan Hrishenko (paid by department)
Web Designer Beatrice Angelache (half time)
Students 15 Graduate students 9 Undergraduates
3
Responsibilities
  • Hiring, Funding and Policy decisions
  • Co-directors "executive committee"
  • Selection of Probes
  • Co-directors "advisory committee"
  • Individual PROBEs
  • PROBE organizers (oversight from co-directors)
  • Workshop Logistics
  • Administrator
  • Publications Web design
  • L. Blum B. Angelache
  • College Workshops
  • Lenore Blum
  • Algorithms Depot
  • Guy Blelloch

4
Executive Committee
  • Guy Blelloch
  • Lenore Blum
  • R. Ravi
  • Daniel Sleator
  • Robert Tarjan

5
Friday Faculty Lunches
Every Friday we have a faculty lunch in which we
discuss Possible PROBE topics (external
speakers), upcoming events, status of PROBEs
Typically in Attendance
Sometimes in Attendance
  • Guy Blelloch
  • Avrim Blum
  • Lenore Blum
  • Manuel Blum
  • Lisa Fleischer
  • Alan Frieze
  • Anupam Gupta

Mor Harchol-Balter Bruce Maggs Gary Miller Adam
Meyerson R. Ravi Danny Sleator
Bernard Chazelle Bob Nichol Bob Tarjan Latanya
Sweeney
de-facto AdvisoryCommittee
6
Selecting PROBE Topics
  • Current process
  • Executive committee solicits topics.
  • Someone presents the topic at a Friday lunch
  • If there is enough interest from faculty at the
    lunch we encourage the formation of an
    organization committee
  • Key selection criteria
  • High potential impact
  • Cross disciplinary
  • Scope is not too narrow or too broad
  • Potential interest to students and faculty

7
Leveraging other projects
  • We have co-organized some PROBEs with other
    projects (e.g. Meshing with Sangria).
  • This has allowed us to support more PROBEs than
    initially proposed.

8
Timeline (approx.)
Sept 02
Sept 03
Sept 04
Sept 01
CAPTCHA
Privacy
Meshing
Logistics
Graph Cuts
Dyn. Algs.
Algs. Econ.
Sched. Net.
  • joint with other projects

9
Are PROBEs working?
  • Measurements
  • Are topics being introduced across fields,
    leading to research and published papers?e.g.
    k-anonymity paper submitted to SODA
  • Are we changing the way algorithms are used in
    practice?
  • Are research proposals being submitted on the
    topic?
  • We think they are, but in general it is too early
    to tell.

10
Dissemination activities
  • Research Papers 38
  • PROBE Workshops 6
  • College Workshop material for classes at
    Undergraduate Colleges
  • Partnership activities CAPTCHA used by Yahoo,
    ideas followed up by Xerox PARC and Berkeley
  • News articles on CAPTCHA in NYT
  • Algorithms Depot initial release over the next
    year

11
Princetons Involvement
  • Logistics PROBE held at Princeton
  • Moses Charikar co-organized the logistic PROBE
  • Bob Tarjan co-organizing Dynamic Algorithms PROBE
  • Bernard Chazelle involved in trying to start a
    PROBE on high-dimensional geometry
  • Princeton students participated in Logistic
    PROBE, and graph cuts PROBE.

12
Compared to the Original Plan
  • PROBEs have been for 2 years instead of 1 1.5
  • Suggested by the reviewers
  • Supporting more parallel PROBEs than proposed
  • We have not yet used an external advisory
    board.
  • Richard Karp (Berkeley), Udi Manber (Amazon), and
    Fred Roberts (DIMACS) agreed in principal but we
    have yet to ask them to take a formal role.
  • PROBE workshops are not as synchronized as
    proposed.
  • We do plan to have a joint workshop next summer.
  • Note Library component was dropped when grant
    was scaled down by 50.

13
Plans for next year
  • Talk to industrial partners about monetary
    support.
  • Review successes and shortcomings of previous
    PROBEs
  • Form committee for Algorithms Depot
  • Possibly start a quarterly or semiannual
    newsletter

14
Budget Summary
  • Administration
  • Faculty
  • Students
  • PostDoc
  • Workshops
  • Other
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com