Title: Episodic and semantic memory
1Lecture 503-12-2007
- Episodic and semantic memory
2Plan
- Contents of episodic memory
- Irrelevant memories
- Repetition and practice
- Organization and distinctiveness
- The remember/know distinction
- Organization of semantic memory
- Episodic and semantic memory a comparison
- Relations between episodic and semantic memory
the SPI model
3Introducing remarks
- Episodic memory memories of events that we
experienced, concerns ones own past and facts
personally experienced, possible to locate in
time and space - Semantic memory other than personal character,
contains general world knowledge necessary for
language use shared with other people
4Contents of episodic memory serial position
effects
- Primacy effect superior memory for items at the
beginning of a sequence - Recency effect superior memory for items at the
end of a sequence - Both effects are present in STM and LTM, but
their interpretations are different - In STM, the primacy effect is representing
long-term storage, the recency effect short-term
storage - In LTM, the primacy effect may reflect higher
distinctiveness, novelty, lower interference the
recency effect higher distinctiveness, lower
forgetting effects both lower interference
5Contents of episodic memory levels of
representation
- Craik and Lockaharts levels of processing
framework deeper, semantic encoding leads to
stronger memory traces shallow processing leads
to weak memory traces - Texts representation surface form, text base and
mental model - Surface form is forgot quickly, text base had a
more durable retention, mental model remembered
over long periods of time
6Episodic memory retention for information at
different levels of representation
7Contents of episodic memory recall cues
- Recall or retrieval cue a prompt directing
retrieval - Cues in general improve retrieval because the
information in the cues is also present in the
memory traces - Types of cues feature cues and context cues
- Feature cues involve components of the memory
itself self is a very powerful memory cue (the
self-reference effect) - Context cues involve parts of the environment
linguistic, external and internal context
8Contents of episodic memory context
- Encoding specificity principle
- Godden and Baddeleys study with divers as an
example of memory depending of external context - Probably stronger for recall than recognition
- Does it matter where students take exams?
- Evidences for a context effect with music and
odors (Proust effect) - State-dependent memory alcohol, nicotine,
marijuana
9External context Godden and Baddeleys study
10State-dependent memory sober or intoxicated
11Mood-dependent and mood-congruent memory
- It is easier to recall positive stimuli when in
positive mood, and negative stimuli when in
negative mood - Recall is better if people are in the same mood
as when encoding the information - A negative role of the effect in depression
- Maybe encoding specificity and state-dependent
memory are forms of mood-congruent memory
12Transfer appropriate processing
- Memory is better when at retrieval the same or
similar mental processes are used as at encoding - Overall memory is better when encoding in a
semantic way (Craik and Lockharts levels of
processing theory), but - the effect of the matching between encoding and
the memory test may be very strong - Semantic processing had a stronger positive
impact on explicit memory tests shallow
processing on implicit memory tests
13Irrelevant memories interference
- Negative transfer prior learning impedes the
ability to learn new information - The amount of negative transfer is a function of
the degree of overlap between the old and new
information - Proactive interference old knowledge results in
the increased forgetting of new knowledge (or
greater difficulties in retrieval) - Release from proactive interference Wickens
procedure
14Stimulus lists from proactive interference study
15Results from a study of release from proactive
interference
16Retroactive and associative interference
- Retroactive interference occurs when new
knowledge makes it difficult to recall old
knowledge - How the delay time before recall is spent matters
for the interference effect it is better to go
to sleep after learning than learning something
else - Associative interference due to associations
linked with items and not to the temporal
sequence - Fan effect the more you know, the harder it is
to remember new information.Is it always the
case?
17How to reduce interference?
- Extensive practice
- Learning dissimilar materials one after the other
- Change learning strategies
- Change the context of learning
- Make pauses
- Inhibition part-set cuing directed forgetting
negative priming repeated practice effect
18Repetition and practice
- Repetition effect the more a person is exposed
to information, the more likely it will be
remembered - Massed practice (learning in a single, lengthy
session) and distributed practice (spaced
practice), distributed across multiple study
sessions - In general, memory is better following
distributed practice than massed practice - The longer the spacing between the distributed
practices, the better the memory - But massed practice provide higher reminiscence
19Effects of massed versus spaced practice on
subsequent memory
20Why spaced practice gives better results as
compared to massed practice?
- Deficient processing with massed practice
consolidation is worse and concerns one memory
trace habituation occurs with massed practice
and the level of attention is lower as the
memory traces are fresh, people assume they
remember better and devote less time and effort
to learning - Encoding variability the contexts in massed
practice are the same giving less retrieval cues - Dual processes both deficient processing and
encoding variability
21Overlearning and permastore
- Overlearning practice of the already memorized
information - Overlearning strengths memory traces and
increases resistance to forgetting - Bahricks studies on the retention of school
materials an initial period of forgetting of
about three years and stable retention after
(permastore) - Forgetting occurs at about the same rate for
everybody, so knowing more at the beginning means
having larger knowledge in permastore
22Organization and distinctiveness
- Organization of the to-be-remembered-information
improves episodic memory - Subjective organization is especially helpful,
although it takes more time and effort - Distinctiveness items that are different (more
salient or unique) from other items are better
remembered - Bizarre imagery bizarreness may help memory, but
the effect is less universal than it is claimed - Interactive imagery usually proves to help memory
23The remember/know distinction
- Remember judgments reflect the belief that an
event occurred evidence of episodic memory
(autonoetic I know that I know) - Know judgments reflect a feeling of familiarity
evidence of semantic memory (noetic I know) - A double dissociation between these two types of
responses - Nondeclarative (procedural) memory is considered
as being anoetic (unconscious) I don't know
that I know
24Factors affecting remember but not know
- Depth of processing
- Generation effects
- Frequency of occurrence
- Divided attention at encoding
- Retention interval
- Reading silently or aloud
- Intentional versus incidental learning
- Serial position
25Factors affecting know but not remember
- Repetition priming
- Stimulus modality
- Amount of maintenance rehearsal
- Suppression of focal attention
26Factors affecting rememberand know in
opposite ways
- Word versus nonword memory
- Massed versus distributed practice
- Gradual versus abrupt presentations
- Learning emphasizing similarities versus
differences - Different neurological mechanisms for both types
of responses
27Organization of semantic memory
- Concepts and categories prototype theory
exemplar theory explanation-based theory - Ordered relations semantic distance effect
semantic congruity effect serial position effect - Schemas and scripts
- The organization of semantic memory is described
by some of the long-term memory models reviewed
in lecture 4
28Differences between episodic and semantic memory
information
29Differences between episodic and semantic memory
operations 1
30Differences between episodic and semantic memory
operations 2
31Differences between episodic and semantic memory
usage
32Relations between memory systems Tulvings SPI
model
- The relations between three main memory systems
of perceptual representation, semantic memory and
episodic memory are specific in relation to
processes - Encoding has a serial character (S)
- Storage is parallel (P)
- Retrieval is independent (I)
- Systems are organized in a hierarchical way
- Different aspects of the information are
separately stored in each system
33Schematic SPI model