Scientific Discovery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Scientific Discovery

Description:

Law of attraction. Law of love. Law of aggression. Law of ... Alpha level of .05 means that there is a 5% chance that the results were accidental not real ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: eliza77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Scientific Discovery


1
Scientific Discovery
  • Laws, Theories, and Hypotheses

2
Laws
  • Laws are universal statements about the nature if
    things.
  • Laws allow for reliable predictions about future
    events
  • Goals of science to discover these natural Laws
  • Laws of Thermodynamics
  • Laws of Motion

3
Laws of Psychology?
  • Is there a
  • Law of attraction
  • Law of love
  • Law of aggression
  • Law of fear
  • Law of learning and memory

4
Theories
  • Theories are general statements about the
    relationship between two or more variables
  • Theories emphasize causal relationship between
    variables
  • Whereas Laws pertain to every event, Theories
    have boundary conditions
  • E.G. they are true given a specific set of
    circumstances

5
Theories
  • There are sometimes more than one theory to
    explain an event
  • Overcrowding causes aggressive behavior
  • Alcohol causes aggressive behavior
  • Frustration causes aggressive behavior
  • Each of these theories may be true under
    different circumstances
  • Principle of equifinality states that the same
    outcome may have different causes

6
Hypotheses
  • An Hypothesis is a test of specific events
    derived from the theory
  • Theory Level of alcohol consumption influences
    risk taking behavior
  • Hypothesis heavy drinkers will take more risks
    in a simulated driving test than light drinkers

7
Making Observations
  • Induction
  • Make the same observation many times
  • induce a theory to account for it
  • You are taking specific observations and
    generating a general theory
  • Problem
  • Could make hundreds of observations, all proving
    you right, but the next observation could prove
    you wrong.

8
Deduction
  • Going from the general to the specific
  • Generate specific hypotheses that are tested
    against the theory
  • Makes it possible to show a theory is false but
    never that it is true
  • Karl Popper championed falsifiability as a
    necessary part of good scientific testing

9
Positive Test Bias
E
K
4
7
Hypothesis every card containing a vowel must
have an even number on the other side
10
Positive Test Bias
E
K
4
7
6
5
J
A
11
Positive Test Bias
  • Usually pick once card
  • Usually pick the care that verifies hypothesis
  • Forget to pick card that can prove hypothesis
    false

12
Validation Falsification
  • Scientists also fall victim to positive test
    bias.
  • Scientists try to prove their hypotheses true
    known as validation
  • Must also gather evidence to prove hypothesis
    false

13
Benefit of falsification
  • Forces repeated experiments
  • Can lead to competing scientific theories
  • Can lead to revision of theories, making them
    more accurate
  • Qualification shows under what conditions
    theories and hypotheses are correct or false

14
Summary
  • We can not prove anything using Science we
    can say what is highly probable.
  • We can set up experiments which can falsify
    theories. This helps us to know what is not
    true/possible or probable
  • Scientist are subjected to the biases as the rest
    of the world. We tend to look for confirmation
    and validation above falsification
  • Others, who disagree will try to falsify your
    work
  • Science is an active process not the sum of
    facts

15
Experimental Paradigm
  • Experimentation refers to the approach by which
    researchers manipulate variables to determine
    their effects on other variables
  • Experiments are very valuable, but are not the
    only tool available to scientists.
  • You can observe a lot just by watching Yogi
    Berra
  • Experiments are specific manipulations of an
    independent variable to affect a specific
    dependent variable

16
Variables
  • Independent variable
  • Variable that is manipulated by the experimenter
  • Dependent variable
  • Variable that depends upon the independent
    variable
  • Experimenters systematically change the
    independent variable and see how that
    manipulation affects the dependent variable

17
Independent and Dependent Variables
  • Classical way to manipulate the independent
    variable is the use of a control group and an
    experimental group

18
Random sampling and random assignment
  • A control group and an experimental group must be
    the same prior to receiving the experimental
    manipulation
  • We make sure they are the same by Random Sampling

19
Random Sampling
  • First you must identify the group you are
    interested in examining
  • Everyone in that group must have an equal chance
    of being selected
  • Want the ones you select to represent the
    average person you would find within that group

20
Random Assignment
  • Once you have your random selection of people
    from within the group of interest you randomly
    assign them to the different groups
  • Control group
  • Experimental group or groups
  • You want each group to be the same that is an
    average of the people you selected for your
    random sample

21
Statistical Testing
  • Use statistics to see if the differences in the
    dependent variable (after the experiment) were
    due to the manipulations in the independent
    variable
  • Research begins with the assumption that the
    hypothesis is false you were wrong the
    experimental group and the control group are
    still the same and any differences were due to
    poor random assignment and or sampling
  • This is known as the null hypothesis

22
Alternative Hypothesis
  • The alternative hypothesis states that the
    differences that you see are real. Your
    manipulation worked
  • When to accept the alternative v. the null
    hypothesis?
  • Alpha level of .05 means that there is a 5
    chance that the results were accidental not
    real
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com