Comparison and control: The difference between two proportions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison and control: The difference between two proportions

Description:

have auditioned for symphony orchestras ... records of certain major orchestras. summarized in a bivariate table ... Discrimination in orchestras: Conclusion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: paulvon
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison and control: The difference between two proportions


1
Lecture 13
  • Comparison and controlThe difference between
    two proportions

2
Overview
  • You can already calculate and interpret
  • confidence intervals
  • hypothesis tests
  • for a single population proportion p
  • e.g., proportion of applicants who get hired
  • Today youll learn the same thing
  • for the difference between two population
    proportions(p1 p2)
  • e.g., difference between
  • proportion p1 of female applicants who get hired
  • proportion p2 of male applicants who get hired
  • Well also reinforce how to use a control group
    as a comparison

3
Sex discrimination
  • In government
  • "I'm not for women, frankly, in any job. I don't
    want any of them around. Thank God we don't have
    any in the Cabinet."
  • "I don't think a woman should be in any
    government job whatever. I mean, I really don't.
    The reason why I do is mainly because they are
    erratic. And emotional."
  • Richard Nixon, 37th President of the U.S.,
    1969-1974
  • In orchestras
  • I just dont think women should be in an
    orchestra.
  • Zubin Mehta
  • conductor, LA Symphony, 1964-1978
  • conductor, NY Philharmonic, 1978-1980
  • There is one woman in the Vienna Philharmonic.
  • out of 100 musicians

4
Difference in population proportions
  • Over the last 50 years,
  • both women (population 1) and men (population 2)
  • have auditioned for symphony orchestras
  • Some proportion of female auditioners has been
    hired p1
  • and some proportion of male auditioners has been
    hired p2
  • Let the null hypothesis be absence of
    discrimination
  • State the hypotheses in formal symbols
  • H0 p1- p20 (no discrimination)
  • H1 p1- p2lt0 (discrimination against women)
  • One tail or two?

5
Difference in sample proportions(adapted from
Goldin Rouse 2000)
  • old audition records of certain major orchestras
  • summarized in a bivariate table
  • basically two parallel frequency tables,one for
    women, one for men

aka contingency table (contab) aka
cross-tabulation
Note Table cells (white) sum to table margins
(black) Questions How many men were
rejected? How many women tried out? How many
musicians were hired? How many musicians tried
out?
6
Bivariate table Another view
589/ 59998.33 1072/110297.28 1661/170197.65
98.331.67100 etc. but 98.3397.28?97.65
Questions What of women were hired? What
of men? What overall? What was the difference
in success between women and men?
7
Difference in sample proportions
  • Let women be group 1, men group 2
  • In the sample,
  • p1.0167 of women were hired, vs.
  • p2.0272 of men
  • The difference in sample proportions was
  • p1- p2. 0167-.0272 -.0105, or 1.05
  • Interpret that. Is it a big difference?

8
Difference in population proportions
  • The difference in sample proportions
  • p1- p2. 0167-.0272 -.0105
  • suggests that women were less successful.
  • But what about the difference in population
    proportions?
  • p1- p2
  • Lets test the hypotheses
  • H0 p1- p20 (no discrimination)
  • H1 p1- p2lt0 (discrimination against women)
  • One tail or two?

9
Comparison of formulas
10
Steps of a hypothesis test (review)
  • State null and research hypotheses
  • Collect sample
  • Calculate test statistic
  • If the null hypothesis were true,how
    extreme/unusual would the test statistic be?
  • Interpret

11
Example 1
  • Hypotheses.
  • women are population 1, men population 2
  • p1, p2 are the proportions hired in each
    population
  • H0 p1- p20 (no discrimination)
  • H1 p1- p2lt0 (discrimination against women)
  • Sample (after hypotheses)
  • p1.0167, p2.0272
  • N1599, N21102

12
Example 1 3. Test statistic
13
Example 14. If H0 were true, would the sample
be extreme/unusual?
What is the p value?
14
Example 1 5. Interpretation
  • We have borderline evidence that women were less
    successful than men (plt.075).
  • If the male and female populations were equally
    successful (i.e., if H0 were true)
  • less than 7.5 of samples would show men with
    this large a lead (or larger).

15
Example 1b 95 confidence interval guess
  • In Example 1, comparing men and women, we didnt
    quite reject
  • H0 p1- p20
  • Will a 95 confidence interval for p1- p2 contain
    0?

16
Example 1b 95 confidence interval calculation
Interpretation In the population of auditioners,
were 95 sure that women were between 2.46
less likely than men and .36 more likely than
men to be hired.
17
Example 1bConfidence interval hypothesis test
  • Consistent with the hypothesis test,
  • the interval contains 0though just barely.
  • The value we didnt quite reject
  • H0p1-p20
  • is just barely in the range of plausible values
    for p1-p2

CI
H0
p1- p2
0
-2
point estimate
18
Hypothesis tests confidence intervals
Relationship (review)
  • A confidence interval is a range of plausible
    values
  • for p1- p2
  • A hypothesis test evaluates whether
  • 0 is a plausible value for p1- p2
  • If the test rejects H0 p1- p2 0
  • then 0 will not be in the confidence interval
  • If the test accepts H0 p1- p2 0
  • then 0 will be in the confidence interval
  • but 0 is only one of many plausible values

19
Discussion
  • Suppose men were more successful than women.
  • Would that prove discrimination?

20
Control group
  • Suppose men were more successful than women.
  • Would that prove discrimination?
  • Between 1952 and 1986
  • after the auditions weve looked at
  • the orchestras switched to a blind audition
    format
  • Lets compare
  • women in blind auditions (control group)
  • women in nonblind auditions
  • This isolates the effect of judges knowing the
    players sex

21
Example 2
  • Hypotheses.
  • women in nonblind auditions are group 1
  • women in blind auditions are group 2
  • p1, p2 are the proportions hired in each group
  • H0 p1- p20 (no discrimination)
  • H1 p1- p2lt0 (discrimination against women)
  • Sample data (after hypotheses)
  • p1.0167, p2.0270
  • N1599, N2445

22
Example 2 3. Test statistic
23
Example 2 4. Hypothesis test
What is the p value? Would we reject H0?
24
Example 2 Interpretation of test
  • 7. Interpretation
  • The evidence is not very convincing that blinding
    improved womens prospects.
  • Does this mean there was no discrimination?

25
Example 2b 80 confidence interval guess
  • In Example 2, comparing blind and nonblind
    auditions, we accepted
  • H0 p1- p20
  • with .15gtpgt.10
  • Will an 80 confidence interval contain 0?

26
Example 2b 80 confidence interval calculation
Interpretation In the population of female
auditioners, those in nonblind auditions were
between 2.22 less likely and .16 more likely
to be hired.
27
Example 2bConfidence interval hypothesis test
  • Consistent with the hypothesis test,
  • the interval does contain 0though just barely.
  • The value we accepted H0p1-p20
  • is (just) in the range of plausible values for
    p1-p2
  • but its just one plausible value

28
Discrimination in orchestras Conclusion
  • We have borderline evidence that women dont get
    hired as much as men
  • but we cant convince a skeptic it was because of
    discrimination
  • We will revisit this issue in Lecture 14

29
Summary
  • For the difference between two population
    proportions (p1 p2)
  • youve learned
  • confidence intervals
  • hypothesis tests
  • and their relationship
  • If you reject H0 p1 p2 0
  • then the CI wont contain p1 p2 0
  • If you accept H0 p1 p2 0
  • then the CI will contain p1 p2 0
  • The converse is also true.
  • The most useful comparison is often with a
    control group
  • which is like the group of interest
  • except for the factor youre most interested in

30
Summary Last 2 lectures
  • Procedures for comparing population proportions
  • are like those for population means, except
  • slightly different standard error formulas
  • different distributions
  • proportions use standard normal
  • means use t
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com