Title: Logistics Initiatives Update
1 Logistics InitiativesUpdate
Air Force Materiel Command
Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining Americas
Aerospace Force
- Brig Gen Terry Gabreski
- Director of Logistics
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l
l e n c e
2Purpose
- Provide Updates on
- AF Long-Term Depot Maintenance Strategy
- Depot Maintenance Reengineering Transformation
(DMRT) - Spares Campaign
- Monthly AFMC Reviews to CSAF
3AF Long-Term Depot Maintenance StrategyBackground
- SECAF Tasking from Depot Offsite III (Sep 00) to
Develop Long-Term Depot Maintenance Strategy - Basis for Future Depot Decisions and Investments
- Respond to Congressional Call for Long-Term
Organic Depot Plan - Long-Term Depot Maintenance Strategy through 2020
under development
4AF Long-Term Depot Maintenance StrategyKey
Assumptions / Guidelines
- Need to retain three viable organic depots
- Pursue long-term partnerships with industry
through performance based logistics contracts - Shift to partnering with industry substantially
changes the culture of AFMC - Core Plus workload strategy
- Current core methodology - 10 USC 2464
- Compliance with 50/50 should not be a driver - 10
USC 2466 - Mix of old and new workloads / techniques
- Core / Last Source / Partnership / Best Value
- Need to manage total depot industrial base
- Critical manufacturing and repair capability
5AF Long-Term Depot Maintenance Strategy Key
Assumptions / Guidelines
- Retain Technology Repair Center (TRC) Strategy
- Dual sourcing as necessary for risk mitigation
- AF must invest to ensure robust capability
- Must compete with other AF priorities - will be
tough - Depot maintenance designated as Core will be
reserved for organic performance - All other workloads (core plus) will be allocated
based on meeting performance-based requirements
at best value - Utilize new weapon systems to maintain Core
GOAL Ensure responsive depot maintenance to
support the warfighter across the entire spectrum
of military operations
6AF Long-Term Depot Maintenance Strategy Time Line
- CSAF / SECAF Briefed 17 Oct 01
Fall Corona Briefed 31 Oct 01
Brief DOS IV 28 Nov 01 Present to
Congress 2002
7Purpose and Objectives of DMRT
- Improve depot maintenance support to the
warfighter - Reengineer depot processes reduce flow times,
increase production and throughput - More responsive to peacetime and contingency
requirements - Improve depot maintenance financial performance
- Eliminate unprogrammed and unbudgeted costs
- Resolve disconnect between requirements and
budgeting process - Reduce financial risk to AF Total Obligation
Authority (TOA) - Improve accountability of Working Capital Fund
operations - Other Opportunities
- Directly address Depot Maintenance problems
root causes - Reverse problems introduced during downsizing
This is an Air Force projectNot an AFMC project
Need AF solutions!
8Logistics Transformation Vision
Total Air Force Transformation
- The two most important things we do is fly and
fix airplanes. - General Jumper
- We must fundamentally transform our Combat and
Support capabilities by leveraging information
and process improvements across the Air Force
enterprise to achieve significant operational
efficiencies and drive down support costs. - Business Transformation Vision Statement
9Eight Focus Areas
300 Inputs Consolidated into 40
ISSUES Categorized into 8 focus areas
10Vision / Future State
- Part of AF business transformation effort
- Must change the culture - new way of thinking
- Build and communicate vision for the future
Connect Depot Maintenance Processes With
Warfighter Outcomes
11DMRT Summary
- Implementation actions categorized in eight focus
areas - On schedule
- Focused on Actions and Results
- Better Trained Workforce - Increased Throughput
- Reduced Flow Times - Better Accountability
- Successful implementation of DMRT critical to
USAF Transformation -
The Goal Improved Warfighter Support
Financial Performance
12Spares Campaign Background
- Approved by CSAF in Feb 01 as a plan to reshape
Air Force Supply - Identify opportunities to re-engineer supply
processes and improve support to the Warfighter - Reverse negative performance seen from 1991-2000
- MC rates decreased 8.5 points
- CANNs increased 3.8 per 100 sorties
- TNMCS increased 5.7 points
- Reduce un-programmed, unbudgeted bills
- AF received lt82 funding for computed spares
requirements in 4 of last 11 years - 1,397M plus up in Spares funding from FY98-02
- Achieve best mission capability given fiscal
realities - Improve responsiveness to EAF Operations
13Spares CampaignWhere We Are
- Current Spares Campaign focus
- Ten principal change areas
- Change DLR structure
- Improve spares budgeting
- Improve financial management
- Improve demand repair workload forecasting
- Establish virtual Inventory Control Point
- Align Supply Chain Management focus
- Standardize use expand role of RSS
- Adopt improved purchasing supply chain
management - Improve Stock Level Process
- Improve AF Material Support Policies
- Issues
- Resources to achieve changes
- Timeline is demanding
- Challenge to established lines of control
14Spares Campaign Time Line
- CSAF approved plan to reshape supply Feb 01
Five Process Teams met Mar-Jun 01
MAJCOM LGs briefed on solutions Jul 01
Highest payback issues selected Oct 01 AFMC/CC
briefed Oct 01 CORONA briefed Nov 01 OPRs
develop implementation Nov 01- Nov 02 AF-IL
AFMC/CC status brief Bimonthly
15Monthly AFMC Reviews to CSAF
- Compare ALC performance
- SMAG / DMAG metrics
- Production and flowdays
- Issue / Stockage effectiveness
- MICAPS and backorders
- Burndown rates
- Net Operating Results
- ALC Commanders identify problem root causes and
present get well plans - Do away with programmatic surprisesget
predictive
AFMC Leadership, Accountability and
Responsiveness to Warfighter
16Summary
- Many initiatives...many moving parts
- Transformational
- Encompass both depot maintenance and supply
- Posture depots for long-term viability and world
class service - Communication plan important as we proceed
17(No Transcript)