FCB Integration Slides

1
Delivering Joint Capabilities to the
WarfighterDefense Intelligence Acquisition
Conference16 May 2007
MG Michael Vane Vice Director Force Structure,
Resources, and Assessment, J8
2
Agenda

• JROC Initiatives
• Capability Gaps
• Challenges
• Improvements

3
Shared Challenges

• Realistic performance requirements
• Gain senior leader input earlier in development
  cycle
• Ensure COCOM needs are met
• Focus on most important issues

4
JROC Goals

• Getting the JROC Ahead of Strategic Issues and
  Shaping Strategic Decisions
• Making fiscally informed decisions realistic
  performance parameters
• Holistically addressing combatant command
  warfighter issues in fiscally informed
  environment
• Bringing stakeholders from the Department and the
  Interagency to the JROC to solve issues when
  appropriate

• The JROC Initiatives
• Affordability
• JROC Expanded
• Most Pressing Military Issues

Ensuring the Joint Warfighter has the required
capabilities to execute the NMS in a resource
constrained environment
5
Improving the Quality of JROC Decisions
Oversight
RGS
Senior Leader Involvement

• Affordable
• Technically Feasible
• Achievable Schedule
• Born Joint
• Top 5 Cost Drivers
• gt5 Cost Growth Watch list
• Requirements Management Certification Training
  Program

CBP
A
B
C
FUE 10-15 yrs
Concept CBA
JCD/ ICD
CDD
CPD
MNS ACAT I Only
ORD Update AOA (ACAT 1) 30 Mos
ORD 7-10 Yrs
Future Focus Here
Strategic Planning Guidance
Full Rate Prod DR
JCD
EoA Report
CPD
CDD
System Development Demonstration
EoA
Joint Concepts
Technology Development
FNA
FAA
OS
FCB
COCOM
OSD/JCS
6
Joint and Realistic Performance Requirements

• Providing the right capabilities to the
  Warfighters on time and within resource levels
• JROC mandated assessment of cost drivers and key
  system interdependencies for all reviewed
  programs

• Testing cost is flagged as excessive
• Investigation reveals confidence level associated
  with testing (95 vs. 90) is too high and
  driving cost up
• Reducing testing cost lowers program cost

• JTRS Cluster 1 is critical interdependency for
  LHA
• JTRS is behind on cost and schedule
• Program cannot achieve full capabilities without
  JTRS

Making better decisions earlier informed by
capability and cost
7
JROC Expanded

• Definition
• Bringing together key stakeholders from across
  the Department of Defense and Interagency, when
  appropriate, to shape decisions in support of the
  Joint warfighter

• Authority/Responsibility
• Advisory support to the JROC
• Comprised of informed stakeholders
• Empowered to speak for their Principal

COCOM Needs
Resources
Improving Transparency and Decision
8
JROC Expanded

• Requirements better reflect the needs of the
  warfighter
• Five COCOMs actively participated in JROC and
  shaped Joint High Speed Vessel capabilities
  decision
• Transitioned ACTD vs New Start
• Incremental Approach
• JROC led National Polar-orbiting Operational
  Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS)
  capability review with Interagency (NOAA, NASA)
  to ensure priority COCOM requirements were met
• JROC led prioritization and identified trades
• Reduced the Program Acquisition Cost by 5.2B
• Reduced FY06-13 funding shortfall by 84M to
  1.88B
• JROC adjusted KPPs for 3 of 6 Programs in Breach
  of Nunn McCurdy this year

Bringing stakeholders from the Department and the
Interagency to the JROC to solve issues quicker
9
Capability Assessment Process
Decisions/Guidance
JROC
Gap Synthesis Assessment
Approved Gaps Priorities Guidance
Accept Risk
Army
Navy
USMC
FCB Assessment Prioritization
FCB
COCOMs
Air Force
Support POR/On Going Efforts
OSD (ATL)
DIA
Most Pressing Military Issues
JCB
OSD (NII)
OSD (PAE)

• Identify Materiel/ Non-Materiel Solutions
• Reprogram or provide additional funding for
  ongoing programs
• OSD
• - ACTD/JCTD ST Investment
• - Roadmaps
• - Acquisition
• FCB / Services / Agencies
• - CBA
• - DCRs

Capability Issue Inputs
OSD - QDR SPG TPG Roadmaps ST ACTD/JCTD
Analytic Agenda SCG CPG, Defense Agencies
Combatant Commands - IPL LL DCR JUON 7500
- Concepts and JCIDS Documents - JE Results

• Develop concepts and experiments that determine
  how to solve a specific military problem
• JFCOM
• - Joint Experimentation
• Joint Staff
• - Concepts
• OSD
• - ST Investment Industry
• - ACTD/JCTD
• Service
• - Concepts / Experimentation

SERVICEs - JCDs - Vision/Concepts -
Challenges/Gaps
Joint Staff - OA Studies - CRA - JOpsC -
Concepts - JQRR - GFM - CSART

• Study Specific Military Issues
• OSD/Services/Joint Staff
• - Operational Availability Studies and
  Sub-studies

Repeatable Process
10
Most Pressing Military Issues

• JROC is addressing unique Persistent
  Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
  shortfalls identified by six combatant commands
• Warfighter identified issues include
• Lack of persistent collection in denied areas
• Inadequate numbers of trained CI/HUMINT personnel
• Lack of ability to tag, track, and locate (TTL)
  individuals of interest
• JROC recommendations resulted in funding for
  UAVs, CI/HUMINT, foliage penetration (FOPEN),
  TTL, and others in Program Budget Review (PBR08)
• 560 M in funding across FY08-13 (Battlespace
  Awareness Joint Capability Area)
• JROC directed development of a Capability Based
  Assessment to address longer term issues
• Functional Capabilities Boards (FCBs) are
  preparing plans of actions and milestones (POAMs)
  for JROC approval to address eleven other
  recurring high priority issues

Holistically Addressing Combatant Command
Warfighter Issues In Fiscally Informed Environment
11
Most Pressing Military Issues (per 31 Aug 06 JROC)

• Most Pressing Military Issues
• Collect and fuse multi-source sensor data
  increasing situational understanding
• Provide persistent surveillance in
  ungoverned/denied areas
• Improve interagency coordination and planning to
  develop shaping strategies to assist nations at
  strategic crossroads
• Improve information sharing to support
  operational forces and mission partners by
  providing adequate bandwidth and information
  sharing tools.
• Improve joint force management
• Improve joint force projection and joint force
  sustainment
• Establish capability to locate, tag, and track
  individuals
• Increase and improve irregular warfare capacity
  in conventional forces (language, cultural,
  behavioral, HUMINT) and ability to model
  irregular challenges
• Improve the ability to defeat improvised
  explosive devices (IED), mines and other buried
  objects
• Affordability of required capabilities
• Enable joint forces to operate in a protected
  net-centric environment
• Review and recapitalize joint force capabilities
  to maintain dominance across the full range of
  military operations

12
The Intelligence Process (as of 15 May 07)
IPL 4 JQRR 1 CSART 14
CBA 1 ICD 1 CDD 6 CPD
2 ORD 1
Planning Direction
24 Gaps 52 Solutions
51 Gaps 64 Solutions
IPL 12 JQRR 7 CSART 5 CBA
0 ICD 14 CDD 13 CPD 8 ORD 17
Evaluation Feedback
Observation Collection
IPL 0 JQRR 0 CSART 2 CBA 0 ICD
0CDD 4 CPD 1 ORD 1
IPL 0 JQRR 0 CSART 8 CBA 0 ICD
3 CDD 11 CPD 2 ORD 3
Processing Exploitation
Integration Dissemination
IPL 5 JQRR 0 CSART 2 CBA 0
ICD 1 CDD 7 CPD 1 ORD 5
IPL 7 JQRR 5 CSART 3 CBA 0 ICD
0 CDD 8 CPD 3 ORD 3
Analysis Production
Some gaps may appear in multiple places, e.g.,
IPL, JQRR or CSART gap overlap
Persistent-ISR Joint Integrating Concept
13
Coordinated JROC MRBReview Process
Cross Membership
JROC
MRB
Cross Membership
MRB Work Group
JCB
MRB on BA FCB
BA FCB
MRB Exec Sec
JCIDS Review Process
MRB Review Process
Coordinated Review
Sponsoring Component
14
Summary

• The JROC assists the Chairman in identifying and
  assessing the priority of joint military
  requirements to meet the national military
  strategy
• Ensuring COCOM needs are identified and
  holistically assessed to ascertain the right
  capability requirement (example Persistent ISR)
• Bringing together senior leaders and shaping
  decisions in support of the warfighter (example
  NPOESS)
• Providing the warfighter capabilities that
  reflects resource levels projected by the SecDef
  (example JROC mandated assessment of cost
  drivers and key system interdependencies)
• Developing more informed Chairmans advice and
  program review issues papers to support COCOM
  needs (example 5.5B moved for COCOMs)
• ISR persistent gap identified by COCOMs.
  Solutions are not yet addressing totality of
  gaps.
• JROC MRB working together to streamline and
  improve

Bringing together the requirements, acquisition,
and resourcing stakeholders to improve decisions
and support the COCOM