Feedback from Day 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Feedback from Day 1

Description:

Students will explain the cause and effect relationship between simple ... for non-fiction science reading and journaling based on their own interest ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: Bain7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Feedback from Day 1


1
Feedback from Day 1
  • Learning Targets
  • Observations

2
Related Core Content for Assessment Students
will explain the cause and effect relationship
between simple observable motion and unbalanced
forces.An object remains at rest or maintains a
constant speed and direction of motion unless an
unbalanced force acts on it (e.g., gravity). When
an unbalanced force acts on an object, the change
in speed or direction depends on the size and
direction of the force.
  • I can
  • Define motion, balanced force, unbalanced force,
    and newtons (K)
  • Tell that balanced forces produce no change in
    motion (K)
  • Explain that unbalanced forces cause motion (K)
  • Predict the direction an object will move as a
    result of applied force (R)
  • Define inertia, speed and gravity (K)
  • Identify the basic forces that oppose motion on
    our planet gravity, friction, and wind
    resistance (K)
  • Read and interpret graphs of average speed (R)
  • Describe the velocity of an object using speed
    and direction.(K)
  • Use vectors to calculate the net force acting on
    an object and predict the objects motion. (R/S)
  • Create a product that describes the effects that
    balanced and unbalanced force have on motion in
    the world around us. (P)

3
Big Idea Motion and Forces (Physical Science)
Grade 7Whether observing airplanes, baseballs,
planets, or people, the motion of all bodies is
governed by the same basic rules. At the middle
level, qualitative descriptions of the
relationship between forces and motion will
provide the foundation for quantitative
applications of Newtons Laws
  • Program of Studies Understandings
  • Students will understand that an object remains
    at rest or maintains a constant speed and
    direction of motion unless an unbalanced force
    acts on it (inertia).
  • Students will understand that forces acting
    against each other can be balanced, canceling
    each other out and having no net effect.
  • Students will understand that gravity is an
    attractive force created by mass. All objects are
    attracted to each other by gravity, but this
    attraction is easy to see only when at least one
    of the objects has a large mass.

4
  • Program of Studies Skills and Concepts
  • Students will use appropriate tools and
    technology (e.g., timer, meter stick, balance,
    spring scale) to investigate the position, speed
    and motion of objects
  • Students will test the cause and effect
    relationship between straight-line motion and
    unbalanced forces
  • Students will investigate balanced and unbalanced
    forces and their effect on objects and their
    motion
  • Students will make inferences and draw
    conclusions about the motion of objects, and
    predict changes in position and motion as related
    to the mass or force
  • Students will calculate work as the product of
    force and distance moved in the direction of the
    force
  • Students will identify gravity as a force that
    acts over a distance, and distinguish it from
    other forces that do the same (e.g. magnetism)
  • Students will investigate the properties of
    gravity and observe its effects on objects
  • Students will distinguish between weight (as a
    function of gravity) and mass (matter content) of
    an object

5
Creating Quality AssessmentsDay 2
  • Formative Checkpoint
  • Response Cards

6
Claires Test
  • What is the assessment measuring?
  • What are the learning targets?
  • Page 22

7
After an assessment how can we bring students
inside of the assessment system?
8
You Be George and other examples on pages 25 -33
9
(No Transcript)
10
Effective Use
  • Once you have gathered accurate information what
    will you do with it?
  • The diagnosis needs a prescription.

11
Descriptive vs. EvaluativeFeedback
  • Page 36

12
Effective DescriptionFeedback . . .
  • Describes features of work or performance
  • Relates directly to learning targets and/or
    standards of quality
  • Points out strengths and gives specific
    information about how to improved

13
What kinds of feedback do students generally
receive? When does it occur in the learning
process? How often?
14
Sample Feedback
  • Page 37 - 38

15
Shoulder Partner Feedback quotes
  • Page 39 -40

16
Feedback
  • The QUALITY of the feedback rather than its
    existence or absence is what determines its
    power.
  • --Barnert-Dewns, Kulik, Kulik, Morgan, 1991
  • Sadler, 1989

17
You dont fatten the pig by weighing it
18
Assessing for Student Learning
  • Every few days stop to assess for student
    learning
  • These assessments can look like a typical graded
    assessment
  • The method of assessment must match the target
    type

19
Assessing for Student Learning
  • Assessments for learning are penalty free.
  • They are used to determine a students progress
    towards mastery of the targets
  • This feedback allows students to evaluate where
    they are in their climb towards understanding.

20
Using Assessment Information
  • Assessing for learning is just the beginning of
    the process
  • Once a students mastery of the targets has been
    determined, it is the job of the teacher to
    provide either intervention for those students
    falling behind or extension for those students
    ready to move on

21
Flexible Grouping
  • Flexible grouping allows the teacher to meet the
    need of all of his or her learners
  • With flexible grouping students are not always in
    the same groups
  • Students move in and out of groups based on where
    they are with their learning on that day

22
Flexible Grouping and Differentiation
  • We know that students learn better if tasks are a
    close match for their skills and understanding of
    a topic (readiness), if tasks ignite curiosity or
    passion in a student (interest), and if the
    assignment encourages students to work in a
    preferred manner (learning profile).
  • -Tomlinson, 2001

23
Flexible Grouping and Differentiation
  • There are three basic ways to use flexible
    grouping to differentiate for student success.
  • 1. Readiness
  • 2. Interest
  • 3. Learning Profile

24
Flexible Grouping Using Readiness
  • Students complete an assessment for learning
    (multiple choice) over knowledge/understanding
    targets
  • Students are broken into groups and given
    different assignments based on their readiness.
  • Some students receive intervention while others
    extend their knowledge with a more challenging
    assignment
  • Intervention students are assessed again while
    extension students debrief their activity with
    the instructor

25
Flexible Grouping Using Interest
  • Students complete an assessment for learning
    (extended written response) over reasoning
    targets
  • Students that show mastery of the targets go to
    the media center for non-fiction science reading
    and journaling based on their own interest
  • Struggling students stay with the class
    instructor for feedback on constructing a well
    written extended response

26
Flexible Grouping Using Learning Profile
  • Students are given an assessment for learning
    over a product target
  • The assessment is for students to demonstrate
    their understanding of a target by the creation
    of a product.
  • Students are allowed to showcase their learning
    in a variety of ways according to their own
    learning style

27
Sound Grading Practices
28
Thinking Cap
  • What are the principles on which your grading
    practices are based?
  • What are your actual grading practices? Do you
    crunch numbers?
  • What was the main influence on your grading
    practices?

29
School improvement expert Robert Marzano asks,
Why would anyone want to change current grading
practices? The answer is quite simple grades are
so imprecise that they are almost meaningless.
- Marzano, 2000, p.1
30
Issues
  • What grading issues typically arise in assessment
    discussions?
  • Which ones are difficult to address?

31
  • Communicating to whom?
  • About What?
  • Using What Evidence?
  • Share How?

32
Mixed factors Results in Lack of Shared Meaning
- Is this evidence of achievement?
  • Ability
  • Effort
  • Compliance
  • Attitude

33
ETS/ATI Grading Principles
  • The purpose of grades is to communicate.
  • Grades only communicate achievement.
  • Grades communicate achievement at a point in time.

34
The Essential Question (s)
  • How confident are you that the grades students
    get in your school are
  • Consistent
  • Accurate
  • Meaningful, and
  • Supportive of learning
  • -Ken OConnor,
  • A Repair Kit for Grading, 2007

35
Grades are only as accurate as
  • The assessments upon which they are based
  • The procedures used to arrive at a final grade
  • The factors that are (or are not) built into the
    grade

36
A Grading Problem
  • Page 42 - 43

37
Writing on Big Paper Activity
38
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 1 Dont include student behaviors (effort,
    participation, adherence to class rules, etc.) in
    grades include only achievement.

39
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades, contd
FIX 2 Dont reduce marks on work submitted
late provide support for the learner.
40
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 3 Dont give points for extra credit or use
    bonus points seek only evidence that more work
    has resulted in a higher level of achievement.

41
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 4 Dont punish academic dishonesty with
    reduced grades apply other consequences and
    reassess to determine actual level of achievement.

42
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 5 Dont consider attendance in grade
    determination report absences separately.

43
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 6 Dont include group scores in grades use
    only individual achievement evidence.

44
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 7 Dont organize information in grading
    records by assessment methods or simply summarize
    into a single grade organize and report evidence
    by standards/learning goals.

45
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 8 Dont assign grades using inappropriate
    or unclear performance standards provide clear
    descriptions of achievement expectations.

46
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 9 Dont assign grades based on students
    achievement compared to other students compare
    each students performance to preset standards.

47
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 10 Dont rely on evidence gathered using
    assessments that fail to meet standards of
    quality rely only on quality assessments.

48
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 11 Dont rely only on the mean consider
    other measures of central tendency and use
    professional judgment.

49
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 12 Dont include zeros in grade
    determination when evidence is missing or as
    punishment use alternatives, such as reassessing
    to determine real achievement or use I for
    Incomplete or Insufficient Evidence.

50
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 13 Dont use information from formative
    assessments and practice to determine grades use
    only summative evidence.

51
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 14 Dont summarize evidence accumulated
    over time when learning is developmental and will
    grow with time and repeated opportunities in
    those instances, emphasize more recent
    achievement.

52
Ken OConnors15 Fixes for Broken Grades
  • FIX 15 Dont leave students out of the grading
    process. Involve students they can and should
    play key roles in assessment and grading that
    promote achievement.

53
  • OConnor, K. (2002). How to Grade for Learning
    Linking Grades to Standards, 2nd Edition.
    Glenview, IL Pearson Education.
  • Fisher, D. Frey, N. (2007). Checking for
    Understanding Formative Assessment Techniques
    for Your Classroom. Alexandria, VA ASCD.
  •  
  • Brookhart, S. (2004). Grading. Upper Saddle
    River, NJ Pearson.
  •  
  • Pollock, J. (2007). Improving Student Learning
    One Teacher at a Time. Alexandria, VA ASCD.
  •  
  • Arter, J McTighe (2001). Scoring Rubrics in the
    Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin Press, Inc.
  •  
  • Chappuis, J. (2007). Learning Team Facilitator
    Handbook and DVD. Portland, OR Educational
    Testing Services.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com