The Finnish Council of University Rectors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The Finnish Council of University Rectors

Description:

From Early Harmony to Current Confusion/Conflict ... The next four years. Innovation University 10% of student population ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hal56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Finnish Council of University Rectors


1
The Finnish Council of University Rectors
  • The role of universities in the national context.
  • Case Finland
  • Krista Varantola

2
Whats going on in Finland?
  • Current situation
  • 10 Multifaculty Universities
  • 6 Specialized Universities
  • 4 Art Universities
  • (1 National Defence College)
  • Students population total 176,599
  • Women 95,066
  • Men 81,533
  • Universities are public and state-owned
    government agencies without a balance sheet (part
    of the state budget)
  • No tuition fees for degree students

3
Whats going to happen in Finland?
  • University law reform
  • Universities will form a new type of legal person
    under public law but remain state-owned
  • One new coalition university, aka Innovation
    University (technology trade industrial
    design)) will become a private, state-owned
    foundation (with 500 Meuro state capital 200
    Meuro private sector industrial capital)
  • Structural Change
  • Mergers, coalitions, alliances
  • 20 universities will become 15 universities
  • No study fees for EU/ETA degree students

4
Why? Guess!
  • Competitiveness in a global environment
  • Aging population and shortage of labour
  • Overall changes in the operating environment
  • OECD review recommendations
  • University governance model needs to be reformed
  • Funding system needs to be modernized
  • More emphasis on internationalization
  • Further development of the dual model in HE
    (universities and polytechnics)

5
From Early Harmony to Current Confusion/Conflict
  • General agreement about the need for law reform
  • First outlines promised equal treatment to the
    whole university sector irrespective of the form
    of governance
  • General disagreement about the recent government
    proposal for funding the reform
  • Proposal means an infusion of budget money to the
    Innovation University while the rest of the
    sector has to be satisfied with a minimal
    increase over the next four years (est. 1.5)

6
The next four years
  • Innovation University 10 of student population
  • 700 Meuro foundation capital 100 Meuro extra
    from the state budget for running costs
  • The remaining 17 universities 90 of student
    population
  • 100 Meuro increase in the state budget for
    running costs

7
The central aims of the reform
  • Enhance institutional autonomy
  • Create a stronger regional network with higher
    societal impact
  • Improve the quality of education and research
  • Target resources to top-level research and
    strategic focus areas
  • Strengthen the role of HE institutions in the
    innovation system

8
Government response to criticism
  • Create more confusion
  • All universities are allowed to become private
    foundations if they can generate foundation
    capital from the private sector. Then the state
    will respond with 2.5 times more state capital.
  • Serious doubts about the availability for such
    altruistic capital.
  • Rules of the game? We should learn about them on
    April 1. April Fools Day

9
What is the message?
  • Strategic focus areas technology and trade
    technical innovations
  • The government puts all eggs in the technology
    basket.
  • Why? The dream of a new Nokia
  • Therefore no criteria have been used in assessing
    which universities deserve the extra investments
  • Large multi-faculty universities are the main
    losers (basic sciences, medicine, social
    sciences, humanities), among them the University
    of Helsinki and large regional universities
    Joensuu Kuopio, JyväskyläTampere, Oulu and
    Turku
  • What about social innovations and welfare
    innovations? Not on the agenda now.

10
Increased autonomy? Current suggestions
  • Standard universities
  • One Board in which half the members and the chair
    are external members. Academic Board?
  • Board nominates rector
  • Private Foundation universities (Innovation
    university)
  • State and donor organizations decide on the Board
    members all members external. A merger of the
    Board of Trustees and the Academic Board?
  • Board nominates rector

11
The historical ethos of Finnish universities
  • The Finnish university system has been
    established and expanded to provide a qualified
    and well-educated work force to cater to the
    needs of Finnish society and its economy.
  • The education system is Finlands finest
    innovation system
  • There is no doubt that the success of Finland in
    economic and societal terms can be traced to the
    reliable standard and regional distribution of
    the universities.
  • Universities have been able to recruit students
    from the whole talent pool irrespective of the
    applicants socioeconomic background.
  • We need to be very careful not to destroy our
    inheritance.

12
Statistical Proof
13
Throwing university with the bath water?
  • Endangered principles
  • Autonomy
  • Equal criteria for budget funding
  • Regional equality and equal access to HE
  • Equal opportunities for all universities to reach
    their strategic aims and compete for external
    research funding

14
Who knows what is relevant in the future?
  • By aiming to obtain immediate benefits and to
    exclusively favour relevant research and
    education, we will limit the freedom of research
    and seriously restrain creativity and curiosity
    thinking which are necessary elements in all
    innovative research.
  • Bell Labs also devoted major resources to pure
    and fundamental research. Its philosophy has
    always been that first-rate, arcane, pure
    research nurtures a culture of curiosity and
    builds bridges with universities, which
    ultimately leads to concrete commercial benefits.
    Those benefits aside, research discoveries at
    Bell Labs have netted six Nobel prices in
    physics, shared among eleven scientists, a record
    that is matched only by the worlds greatest
    universities. (Simon Singh. Big Bang. 2006)

15
What do we need?
  • More perspective immediate economic gains must
    not become the raison dêtre of the reform
  • Nationally acceptable principles for the reform
  • To contribute to the success of a country,
    universities need to be equal partners in their
    cooperation with industry and able to speak with
    their own voices and rely on their own strengths.

16
Back to basics?
  • If the prestigious French Academy of Sciences
    in Paris, which had been set up to so that
    scientists could pursue independent research,
    free from having to pander to the whims of kings,
    queens or popes (Simon Singh)
  • Where in the world is now the place where
    Neo-Humboldtian ideals find an asylum for
    universities that believe in basic research,
    research-based education, creativity and social
    responsibility?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com