Title: Preparations for a Lehman Review
1Preparations for a Lehman Review
- Elton Smith
- Hall D Collaboration Meeting
- Dec 11-13, 2003
2Project acquisition process and CDs
DOE Order 413.3 (Initiated by the Office of the
Chief Financial Officer)
3Project phases and federal budget
BRBudget Request, PEDProject and Engineering
Design Funds
4Change Requests for G0 Experiment
Cost Cost Schedule Performance Approval
1 Minor, within WBS line item (lt5K or 1) float No impact Subsystem manager
2 Within subsystem contingency allocation (gt5k or 1) lt 1 Quarter delay of milestone Sub-system change not affecting subsystem performance or scope Above plus Project manager and Spokesperson
3 Within overall G0 contingency (gt100k or 10) gt 1 Quarter delay of milestone Subsystem change affecting subsystem performance but not G0 performance Above plus L. Cardman and Executive Committee
4 gt 1 Quarter delay of major project milestone Technical scope change, affects experiment capability Above plus Agencies
5Lehman review gives CD-1 approval
- Review of entire 12-GeV project
- Cost
- Schedule
- Technical scope
- Prerequisites
- Acquisition plan
- CDR
- Preliminary project execution plan and baseline
range - Project data sheet for design
- Verification of mission need
- Preliminary hazard analysis report
6Practically, CD-1 is an approval of
- CDR
- pCDR
- section on accelerator
- cost and schedule book
- Best preparation are the subsystem reviews that
we are undertaking - Cost and schedule will have to be covered
(perhaps at a later stage)
7BABAR Conceptual Design Review
- Combined a requirements review with their
conceptual review - Level for conceptual design was one level below a
module - WBS and preliminary cost estimate
- Interface document to other systems
- Grounding and shielding plan
Report of the Electronics Review
8Are there any major items missing in the RD
list? Is the priority given to each appropriate?
- It is critical that the choices made in the
readout architecture reflect requirements imposed
by the physics and detector choices. - Balance priority between design and prototyping
Report of the Electronics Review
9A guess at the process
- Assess costs and schedule of 12-GeV upgrade
project - Adjust cost of project (accelerator and 4 halls)
if outside the box - Review scope in light of cost envelop
- Process will include PAC, similar to pCDR review
- Not clear at which point we will need to
de-scope - Conduct an internally commissioned review of
project - Based on outcome, schedule the DOE (Lehman)
review of project
10Impact of budget profile on schedule
11Lab resources after CD-0
- Assignment of
- Budget
- Current staff
- Determine the speed with which CD-1 can be
achieved
12Manpower (JLab)
13Nuclear Physics Projects