Protectionism and the Global Economy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Protectionism and the Global Economy

Description:

Defined as any attempt to restrict the free flow of ... Auto Industries ... been buying the more fuel efficient Japanese cars which decreased the domestic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Liz255
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protectionism and the Global Economy


1
Protectionism and the Global Economy
  • Elizabeth Bicocco

2
Protectionism
  • Defined as any attempt to restrict the free flow
    of imports into a country.

3
Protectionist Measures
  • Tariffs Tax on imports
  • Import Quotas Limit on the number of imports
  • Export Restraints Exporting country limits the
    number of exports
  • Domestic Legislation Certain percentage must be
    domestically produced
  • Anti-Dumping Predatory Pricing
  • Regulatory Standards Health and environmental
    standards

4
Why protect?
  • Protect domestic production and thus protect and
    create jobs, but this is expensive and there are
    better ways.
  • Help strategic (infant) industries temporarily so
    that they can compete in the global economy or
    recoup investments. These can quickly become
    dependent and are often indefinite instead of
    temporary

5
Continued.
  • Unfair trade which levels the playing field
    because other trading partners are protectionist
    or there are foreign monopolies. Beggar thy
    neighbor principle.
  • National Security first written about by Adam
    Smith which protects national defense industries.
  • National heritage and pride which protect culture.

6
Case Study French Farmers
  • France was importing 60 of their oil seeds from
    the U.S. which were duty free. The E.C. wanted
    more domestic production and created agricultural
    subsidies. These farmers started producing more
    oil seeds than the grains they were producing.
    There was a 25 production loss in the U.S. and 2
    billion dollars to U.S. soybean producers.

7
Case Study Continued
  • In the 1992 Uruguay Round, the U.S. and the E.C.
    agreed to the Blair House Agreement which agreed
    that only a certain percentage of European land
    would be used for oil seed production. In order
    to qualify for a subsidy, the farmers would have
    to leave about 50 of their land fallow.

8
Who pays for this?
  • The tax payer pays for this kind of protectionism
    because they pay twice, once as a consumer for
    the product and again for the subsidy as a tax
    payer. Consumers paid about 395 each for this
    agricultural subsidy which was extremely costly.

9
Economic Gains and Losses
  • This prevents specialization of countries in
    trade, the consumers get the rough end of the
    deal and sometimes pay twice, there is no
    economic rationale, not a long term efficient us
    of resources, and it more political than
    economic.
  • Solution Support these industries directly

10
Who wins?
  • Import competing industry because they can charge
    higher prices
  • The government because it collects revenue from
    tariffs.
  • Sometimes foreign producers because through VERs
    they can raise prices and thus have a higher
    profit margin.

11
Who loses?
  • Consumers because they have less choice and
    availability along with high prices
  • Business because it hurts those industries with
    comparative advantage
  • Foreign Producers because they cannot export
    their product
  • The economy as a whole because of the efficiency
    loss and protected industries remain inefficient
    because they have no reason to change. Also there
    is a growth of lobbying efforts which do not help.

12
Who else loses?
  • The global economy also loses because of the loss
    of specialization benefits, it encourages
    retaliation protectionism which can lead to a
    downward spiral in the global economy as a whole.
  • Protectionism goes against comparative advantage.

13
Tariffs
  • There is an increase in price and a correlating
    decrease in quantity.
  • There is a loss to consumers,but a gain to the
    domestic producers and the government.
  • This can be a dead weight loss for a small
    country in which the entire burden goes to the
    consumer, but in a large country most or all of
    the burden goes to the producers because of
    competition.

14
Import Quotas and VERs
  • Changes supply, does very much the same as a
    tariff with one major difference, instead of
    revenue going to the government, it goes to the
    exporting industry.
  • The foreign producer almost always gains.
  • Temporary restraints are almost never temporary
    and most become indefinite.

15
Case Study USA-Japan Auto Industries
  • 1981 the U.S. asks Japan to stop the increase of
    Japanese cars into the U.S. because since the oil
    crisis, more Americans had been buying the more
    fuel efficient Japanese cars which decreased the
    domestic industries profits and increase
    unemployment. They placed a VER which cut imports
    by 8 but prices on imports increased.

16
Case Study Continued
  • 100,000 jobs were created, but not only did the
    price of foreign cars increase, but domestic
    prices also rose. The cost to consumers was about
    160,000 per job.
  • The protection of one industry is at the cost of
    other industries which may have comparative
    advantage.

17
Pros for Protectionism
  • Create or save jobs
  • Helps strategic or infant industries
  • Noble, understandable cause
  • Protects way of life, culture of a nation.

18
Cons against Protectionism
  • Expensive
  • Creates inefficiency
  • Encourages lobbying
  • Encourages retaliation
  • Damages competitiveness
  • Wasteful
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com