Elections in the US: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Elections in the US:

Description:

Strength: its capacity to deliver a majority government ... Q: proportional representation in the US? A: apportionment of seats in the House ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: coco8
Category:
Tags: elections

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Elections in the US:


1
Elections in the US
  • Gerrymandering paradoxes

2
Plurality elections Discussion/assessment
  • Majoritarian systems who wins? (e.g.,
    parliamentary elections in NZ)
  • Gerrymandering
  • Proportional representation Alabama other
    paradoxes

3
FPTP/plurality strengths weaknesses
  • Strength its capacity to deliver a majority
    government
  • Weakness only probabilistic connection between
    inputs (votes/results) and outcomes
    (seats/results)
  • E.g., NZ 1978-81 (USA 2000?)

4
(No Transcript)
5
Advantage of plurality?
  • Plurality is a giant conjuring trick, pulling the
    rabbit of majority government out of the hat of a
    divided society (Hague Harrop, p. 149)

6
Criticism
  • From a New Zealand perspective, advocacy of the
    plurality method based on its ability to better
    dismiss unpopular governments makes a good joke
  • Pluralitys side effect Gerrymandering

7
(No Transcript)
8
Alabama Paradox
  • Q proportional representation in the US?
  • A apportionment of seats in the House
  • Side effects some unexpected and
    counter-intuitive results

9
House Seats Apportionment
  • Should be quite straightforward, right?
  • E.g., if vote is D 45, R 55, and we have
    100 seats
  • then D 45 seats, R 55 seats
  • But the devil is in the details

10
Example 1
  • Suppose vote is
  • Dem 43.2, Rep 53.3, Green 3.5
  • With 100 seats, D 43, R 53, G 3
  • Who gets the 100th seat?
  • Hamilton largest remainder
  • Next, a made-up example after that, the actual
    historical examples

11
(No Transcript)
12
The Alabama Paradox
  • An increase in the total number of seats to be
    apportioned causes a state to lose a seat
  • 1880 new apportionment
  • If House 299, Alabama gets 8 seats
  • If House 300, Alabama gets only 7 seats!

13
The Population Paradox
  • An increase in a states population can cause it
    to lose a seat
  • Around 1900 Virginia growing about 60 faster
    than Maine
  • New apportionment Virginia lost a seat, Maine
    gained a seat

14
The New States Paradox
  • Adding a new state with its fair share of seats
    can affect the number of seats due other states
  • 1907 Oklahoma added House 386
  • OK entitled to five seats House 391
  • House 391 ? Maine gained a seat, New York lost
    one seat
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com