Title: Disruptive Technologies
1Disruptive Technologies
- Sources
- Christensen, CM, The Innovators Dilemma, Harper
Business, 2000 - Bower and Christensen, Disruptive Technologies
Catching the Wave, HBR 1995, Jan-Feb, 43-53 - Christensen and Overdorf, Meeting the Challenge
of Disruptive Change, HBR 2000, Mar-Apr, 66-76
2Lets Revisit the NPD Process(es) Weve Studied
3Cooper Chapter 3
Revisiting
- The Keys to Victory Seven New Critical Success
Factors - Cooper, Robert G., Product Leadership, Perseus,
2000
4Seven Additional Critical Success Factors
- 1. Resources for NPD in place
- 2. A superior, differentiated product
- 3. Right organizational structure
- 4. An international NPD orientation
- 5. Leverage core competencies
- 6. Market attractiveness
- 7. Speed yes, haste w/o quality no!
5Core Capabilities
- Employee knowledge and skill
- Physical technical systems
- Databases, machinery, and software programs
- Managerial systems
- Employee knowledge is guided and monitored by the
company's systems of education, rewards, and
incentives - Values and norms
- Values serve as knowledge-screening and -control
mechanisms
Source D. Leonard-Barton, Wellsprings of
Knowledge, HBS Press, 1995
66. Market attractiveness
- Two dimensions of market attractiveness
- Market need, growth, size
- Large, growing market
- Strong customer need
- In early stages of product life cycle
- Margins earned are higher
- Competitive situation (negatives)
- Intense competition, price-based
- High quality, strongly competitive products there
- Competitors strong sales force, channel system,
support service
7Cooper Chapter 4
Revisiting
- The Stage-Gate New Product Process
- Cooper, Robert G., Product Leadership, Perseus,
2000
8The Stages
- (Stage 0 Ideation)
- Stage 1 Preliminary investigation
- Stage 2 Detailed investigation (build the
business case) - Stage 3 Development
- Stage 4 Testing and validation
- Stage 5 Full production and market launch
9Stage 2 Detailed Investigation
- Build the business case opens the door to
product development the critical homework stage - Key actions
- User needs-and-wants studies
- Value-in-use studies
- Competitive analysis
- Concept testing
- Detailed technical assessment
- A manufacturing (or operations) assessment
- A detailed financial analysis
10Stage 2 Business Case
- What is the product and who will it be sold to?
(the product definition) - Target market
- Product concept and benefits delivered
- Positioning strategy
- Products features, attributes, requirements
- Why invest in this project?
- Thorough project justification
- How will it be undertaken, when, by whom, at what
cost? (the project plan)
11Identifying Customer Needs
Revisiting
- Chapter 4 Ulrich and Eppinger
12Identifying Customer Needs
- Goals
- Ensure product is focused on customer needs
- Identify both explicit and latent/hidden needs
- Provide fact base for justifying product
specifications - Create archival record of the needs activity
- Ensure no critical customer need overlooked
- Team understands customer needs
13Identifying Customer Needs
- The process
- Gather raw data from customers
- Interpret raw data in terms of customer needs
- Organize needs into a hierarchy (primary,
secondary, etc.) - Establish relative importance of each need
- Reflect on the results and the process
14Quality Function Deployment(QFD)
Revisiting
15Quality Function Deployment
- A technique for identifying customer requirements
and matching them with engineering design and
performance parameters - From the Japanese phrase meaning the strategic
deployment throughout all aspects of a product of
appropriate characteristics according to customer
demands
16And Now, New Questions
- How can great firms do all the right things but
fail to stay atop their industries? - How can good management lead to failure?
17Example - Computers
- Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) created the
minicomputer market - 1977 There is no reason anyone would want a
computer in their home. Ken Olson, Founder and
CEO, DEC - 1986 Taking on DEC these days is like standing
in front of a fast moving train. - 1994 DEC is a company in need of triage. It
squandered two years trying halfway measures to
respond to the low-margin PCs and workstations
that have transformed the computer industry.
18Example - Steel Mills
- Integrated mills - iron ore, coal, limestone into
final steel shapes - high quality plate and structural shapes
- Minimills - melt scrap steel in electric arc
furnaces, cast into billets, roll in final shape - originally, marginal quality, good for rebar,
etc. - little depreciation, little RD costs, low sales
expense, minimal managerial overhead
19Example Steel Mills (cont.)
- Integrated mills and minimills
- look the same in continuous casting and rolling
- scale is the only difference
- In competing product categories, average minimill
can make product of equivalent quality at a 15
lower cost than the average integrated mill - No integrated steel company has built a mill
employing minimill technology
20Example Steel Mills (cont.)
- Integrated mills essentially focused on the sheet
steel market by mid-80s - Advent of continuous thin slab casting allowed
minimill entry by 1990 - By 1995, minimills captured 40 of total market,
with 50 projected by 2000 - Still, no integrated steel company has built a
mill employing minimill technology
21(No Transcript)
22Example - Disk Drives
- In late 70s, market for disk drives consisted of
large mainframe computer makers (with 14-in
drives) - Customers demanded aggressive improvement in
capacity - gt 20/yr, above minimum capacity of 300 MB
- Leading 14-in drive makers maintained aggressive
rate of RD investment - Result dramatic improvements in capacity and cost
23Example - Disk Drives (cont.)
- Concurrently, some startups developed 8-in drives
with lt 50 MB capacity - only minicomputer startups could use them
- low profit margins, low sales volumes
- 14-in drive companies Enter the 8-in market now
or wait until market grows? - waited didnt want to divert scarce engineering
and financial resources
24Example - Disk Drives (cont.)
- 8-in drive makers achieved unexpected capacity
increase of gt 40/year - took over mainframe market within 4 years
- offered additional advantages (lower vibration)
- Although one-third of 14-in drive makers later
introduced 8-in drives, all driven out by the
80s - (note) 8-in drive makers largely experienced same
phenomena when others introduced 5¼-in drive
several years later
25Whats Going On?
- Two types of INNOVATION
- Sustaining
- Disruptive
- Sustaining innovation
- makes a product perform better for mainstream
customers - Disruptive innovation
- creates entirely new markets
26Sustaining Technology
- Most new technologies foster improved product
performance (sustaining technologies) - All sustaining technological changes improve the
performance of established products - Improvements along dimensions of performance
historically valued by mainstream customers in
major markets
27Disruptive Technologies
- Occasionally, disruptive technologies emerge
- innovations that result in worse product
performance (in the near term) - can have enormous potential for the future, but
that future is largely unknown - Its tough to make predictions, especially
about the future. ---- Yogi Berra
28Sustaining Innovation
- Good managers in established companies excel at
sustaining innovations but fare less well with
disruptive ones - Unique core capabilities define a company and
shapes its capacity to change - Resources
- Processes
- Values
29Core Capabilities
- Resources
- people, technologies, cash, product designs,
customer and supplier relationships - Processes
- patterns of interaction, coordination, and
decision-making designed for stability and
consistency - Values
- standards for judging one customer or market
opportunity against another (eg, gross margins,
size of market, etc.)
30Core Capabilities
- Heres the watch-out
- Core capabilities can become core disabilities!
- Leonard-Barton, Wellsprings of Knowledge, HBS
Press, 1995
31Disruptive Innovations
- Often sacrifice performance along dimensions
important to current customers - Offer a very different package of attributes not
(yet) valued by those customers - But the new attributes can open up entirely new
markets
32Disruptive Innovations
33Managing Disruptive Innovation
- Staying focused on main customers can work so
well disruptive technologies are overlooked - consequences can be worse than just missed
opportunity (e.g., disk drive companies) - Established firms must learn how to identify and
nurture innovations on more modest scale - small orders can be meaningful
- ill-defined markets need time to mature
- keep overhead low to permit early profits
34Principles of Disruptive Technology
- If good management practice drives the failure of
successful firms facing disruptive technological
change, the usual answers - plan better, work
harder, become more customer driven, take a
longer term perspective - only exacerbate the
problem!
35Principles of Disruptive Technology(and how to
harness them)
- Companies depend on customers and investors for
resources - Small markets dont solve the growth needs of
large companies - Markets that dont exist cant be analyzed
- An organizations capabilities define its
disabilities - Technology supply may not equal market demand
36Principle 1
Companies depend on customers and investors for
resources
- Managers may think they control the flow of
resources in the firm, but its really customers
and investors who dictate how money will be spent - companies with investment patterns that dont
satisfy their customers and investors dont
survive
37Principle 2
Small markets dont solve the growth needs of
large companies
- As a rule, companies entering emerging markets
early have a significant first-mover advantage
over later entrants - As companies succeed and grow larger, it is
progressively more difficult to enter newer,
smaller markets destined to become larger - Large companies waiting until new markets become
interesting are not usually successful after
the wait
38Principle 3
Markets that dont exist cant be analyzed
- Market researchers and business planners have
consistently dismal records in dealing with
disruptive technologies - Companies with processes that demand
quantification of market sizes and financial
returns before they can enter a market get
paralyzed or make serious mistakes when faced
with disruptive technologies
39Principle 4
An organizations capabilities define its
disabilities
- An organizations capabilities reside in its
processes and values (core capabilities) - Processes and values are not flexible, rendering
an organization incapable of successfully
addressing a new problem - Core capabilities can become core disabilities!
40Principle 5
Technology supply may not equal market demand
- In effort to stay ahead of developing
competitively superior products, many companies - dont realize the speed at which they are moving
up-market - over-satisfy the needs of their original
customers while racing the competition toward
higher-performance, higher-margin markets
41Market Need versus Technological Improvement
(Technologies can often progress faster than
market demand)
42Dealing with Disruptive Technologies
- Dont try to fight or overcome the Principles of
Disruptive Technology - Dont apply the traditional management practices
to disruptive technologies - they always lead to
failure - Try to understand the natural laws of disruptive
technology and use them to create new markets and
new products
43Dealing with Disruptive Technologies
- Give responsibility for disruptive technologies
to units whose customers need them so that
resources will flow to them - Set up a separate organization small enough to
get excited by small gains - Plan for failure. Dont bet all your resources
on being right the first time. Make revisions as
you gather data - Dont count on breakthroughs. Move ahead early
and find the market (outside the mainstream).
Those attributes unattractive to the mainstream
markets are the attributes on which new markets
will be built
44Fitting Innovation with Organizations
Capabilities
Response to Questions
Managers Questions
45Summary
46The Questions
- How can great firms do all the right things but
fail to stay atop their industries? - How can good management lead to failure?
47Summary - Whats Going On?
- Two types of INNOVATION
- Sustaining
- Disruptive
- Sustaining innovation
- makes a product perform better for mainstream
customers - Disruptive innovation
- creates entirely new markets
48Summary - Sustaining Technology
- Most new technologies foster improved product
performance (sustaining technologies) - All sustaining technological changes improve the
performance of established products - Improvements along dimensions of performance
historically valued by mainstream customers in
major markets
49Summary - Disruptive Technologies
- Occasionally, disruptive technologies emerge
- innovations that result in worse product
performance (in the near term) - can have enormous potential for the future, but
that future is largely unknown
50Summary - Dealing with Disruptive Technologies
- Dont try to fight or overcome the Principles of
Disruptive Technology - Dont apply the traditional management practices
to disruptive technologies - they always lead to
failure - Try to understand the natural laws of disruptive
technology and use them to create new markets and
new products
51Summary - Dealing with Disruptive Technologies
- Give responsibility for disruptive technologies
to units whose customers need them so that
resources will flow to them - Set up a separate organization small enough to
get excited by small gains - Plan for failure. Dont bet all your resources
on being right the first time. Make revisions as
you gather data - Dont count on breakthroughs. Move ahead early
and find the market (outside the mainstream).
Those attributes unattractive to the mainstream
markets are the attributes on which new markets
will be built
52The End