Title: Some Thoughts on Transients: Buildup
1Some Thoughts on Transients Buildup Release
of Energy
- David E. McKenzie, Montana State
UniversityBozeman
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006
2Emergence
- Schrijver et al. (2005) 71 of non-potential
active regions studied had new flux emerging at
the time, often associated with shearing motions - Emergence of new field near pre-existing field
(e.g., active regions, filaments) frequently
precedes eruption - Filament activation
- CMEs
- Jets
Temperatures All esp. low-T
Resolution Want high res.
Cadence Faster is better
Continuity Some gaps acceptable
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006
3Helicity
- Not spinning eruption movies
- Emergence?
- Transfer (a la Canfield Reardon)
- Sigmoids
- Associated with eruptions
- Approach instability via helicity transfer
(Glover et al., Canfield et al.)
Temperatures High-T especially
Resolution Full-res for transfer else?
Cadence Faster is better
Continuity Some gaps acceptable?
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006
4Buildup
- Schrijver et al. nonpotentiality persists for
hours - Longcope et al. (2005) Delay of 24 hours
before significant reconnection between active
regions - Without delay, no stress to be released?
- What determines length of delay, or even if there
is a delay?
Heating 5 x 1026 erg/sec
Temperatures All
Resolution Need high-res
Cadence 5 minutes
Continuity No gaps longer than 90 min
Reconnn burst 1017 Mx/sec
24 hour delay
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006
5CME Release
- Tether cutting
- Breakout
- Other?
- What determines?
Temperatures High-T especially
Resolution Want high res.
Cadence Faster is better
Continuity Some gaps okay? Get preflare data
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006
6Inflows
- Yokoyama et al. 5 km/s
- Narukage Shibata 5-6 more
- Looks just like the 2D model
Temperatures High-T especially
Resolution Not crucial 2x2 binning okay
Cadence Faster is better
Continuity Want preflare images
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006
7Patches in Reconnection
- Downflows, as shrinking reconnected flux tubes,
indicate 3D patchy reconnection - Linton Longcope (2006) model of patchy
reconnection produces teardrop-shaped outflows - How much flux per episode
- Downflows give an answer 4 ? 1018 Mx
- Longcope et al, model observations also gives 4
? 1018 Mx
Temperatures High-T
Resolution Want full-res at least sometimes
Cadence Faster is better
Continuity Some gaps acceptable
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting
Monterey, February 13, 2006