Title: Learning Objectives and Classroom Assessment
1Learning Objectives and Classroom Assessment
- Jeff Froyd, Texas AM University
2Workshop Presenter
- Jeff Froyd, Director of Academic Development
- Educational Achievement Division, College of
Engineering, Texas AM University - Project Director, Foundation Coalition
3Acknowledgement
- Russ Pimmel, NSF Program Officer
- Former Professor of Electrical Engineering at the
University of Alabama - Assembled much of the material for similar
workshops
4Objectives Participants will gain experience in
- Describing the rationale for preparing and using
learning objectives in an individual course - Preparing specifications for high quality
learning objectives - Writing learning objectives for a single course
- Preparing specifications for assessment
processes/tools - Generating alternative assessment processes/tools
for a single course - Selecting assessment processes/tools for a single
course
5Agenda
- Background for learning objectives
- Specifications for learning objectives
- Writing learning objectives
- Background for classroom assessment
- Specifications for assessment processes/tools
- Background on alternatives for assessment
processes/tools - Generating alternatives for assessment
processes/tools - Selecting assessment processes/tools
- Review workshop activities
6Agenda
- Background for learning objectives
- Specifications for learning objectives
- Requirements for specifications
- Team exercise develop specifications for
learning objectives - Workshop exercise improve specifications for
learning objectives - Writing learning objectives
- Individual exercise write objectives for a
course or a portion of a course - Team exercise review individual objectives
- Workshop exercise develop a list of suggestions
for writing learning objectives - Individual exercises revise objectives Team
exercise review individual objectives - Workshop exercise reflection
7Agenda
- Background for classroom assessment
- Specifications for assessment processes/tools
- Team exercise develop a set of specifications
for assessment processes/tools - Workshop exercise improve sets of specifications
for assessment processes/tools - Generating alternatives for assessment
processes/tools - Team exercise select some learning objectives
and generate alternative assessment
processes/tools - Background on alternatives for assessment
processes/tools - Selecting assessment processes/tools
- Individual exercise select a set of learning
objectives and generate alternative assessment
processes/tools - Individual exercise select one or more
assessment processes/tools that you would use in
your course - Team exercise share and review choices of
assessment processes/tools - Review workshop activities
8Learning Objectives
- Background for Learning Objectives
Session Objective At the end of the session,
participants will describe themselves as more
confident in their ability to hold productive
conversations with their colleagues regarding the
place and importance of learning objectives in
the teaching-learning process
9Stakeholders for Learning Objectives
- Who are the stakeholders in conversations about
preparing and applying learning objectives? - Faculty
- Students
- Employers
- Accreditation organizations
10EC Program Outcomes
- (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics,
science, and engineering - (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments,
as well as to analyze and interpret data - (c) an ability to design a system, component, or
process to meet desired needs - (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary
teams - (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve
engineering problems - (f) an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility - (g) an ability to communicate effectively
- (h) the broad education necessary to understand
the impact of engineering solutions in a global
and societal context - (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning - (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues
- (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and
modern engineering tools necessary for
engineering practice.
11Blooms Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning
- Knowledge defines, recalls, matches, reproduces
- Comprehension explains, gives examples
- Application discovering, assessing, computing
- Analysis breaking down, organizing, inferring
- Synthesis creating, putting together
- Evaluation appraising, judging, selecting
Western Michigan University, 25 October 2002,
Kalamazoo, Michigan
12Purpose of Learning Objectives
- Communicate expectations for a course
- Provide a context for what will be learned
http//ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/tlr/im
portance.html
13Objectives and Students
- Objectives help students
- Clarify their personal goals
- Provide framework for measuring their success.
- Reduce their anxiety
- Improve their studying effectiveness
- Objectives help instructors
- Guide preparation of classroom material
- Make homework assignments
- Aid in test design
Source - http//ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projec
ts/tlr/importance.html
14Strategies For Workshop Teams
- Be positive, supportive, and cooperative
- Limit critical or negative comments
- At least 5 positive comments for every negative
comment - Be brief and concise in discussions
- Avoid lengthy comments, stories, or arguments
- Stay focused
15Team Roles
- Assign team roles follow through on
responsibilities - Coordinator -- Coordinates discussion develops
consensus - Recorder -- Writes down the ideas reports them
- Gatekeeper -- Keeps the team on the subject
- Timer -- Makes sure the team stays on schedule
- With smaller teams combine gatekeeper timer
16Workshop Team Roles
- For first exercise
- Coordinator Individual with largest class last
semester - Recorder/Reporter Individual on left of
coordinator - Gatekeeper/timer -- Individual on left of
recorder - Timer -- Individual on left of gatekeeper
- Roles rotate clockwise on subsequent exercise
17Team Exercise
- Form teams of four people
- Time 5 minutes
- Develop at least four (4) advantages and four (4)
disadvantages of preparing learning objectives
for a course.
18Team Exercise
- Advantages
- Communication with students expectations and what
they need to learn - Offers focus in preparing material to accomplish
goals - Evaluation tool
- Tie a course to program or curriculum
- Clarifying goals to students seeks buy-in and
self-assessment - ABET Assessment tool
- Stating goals facilitates communicates with
colleagues for better coordination - Written goals facilitates communications with
employers and other external groups - Makes course easier to transfer among faculty
members because much work is already done
- Disadvantages
- Could be too narrow or focused
- Explicitly stating learning objectives takes
(too?) much time - Busy work for faculty
- Could turn into curriculum nightmare
- Poorly written objectives dont help
- Could be cumbersome, ambiguous
- Could be more difficult to measure
19Learning Objectives
- Preparing Specifications for Learning Objectives
- Session Objectives
- At the end of the session, participants will
- Write specifications for learning objectives
- Describe themselves as more confident in their
ability to describe quality learning objectives.
20Form of Learning Objectives
- Write objectives as student outcome statements
- Objectives should answer the questions
- "What must students do to prove that they have
succeeded?" - "What should students be able to do as a
consequence of instruction?"
Source - http//ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projec
ts/tlr/importance.html
21Elements of an Objective
- Objective must contain three basic elements
- Verb describing an observable action
- Conditions of this action
- When given x you will be able to..."
- Level of acceptable performance
Source - http//ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projec
ts/tlr/importance.html
22Verbs for Objectives
- Verbs for constructing concrete objectives
- analyze compute classify collaborate
- compare appreciate contrast define
- demonstrate direct derive designate
- discuss display evaluate know
- identify infer integrate interpret
- justify list understand organize
- grasp report respond solicit
- state synthesize name explain
Modified from http//www.brown.edu/Administration/
Sheridan_Center/pubs/syllabus.htmlcoura
23Learning Objectives Verbs for Categories in
Blooms Taxonomy
- Knowledge
- Define, describe, list, reproduce, enumerate
- Comprehension
- Classify, explain, discuss, give example,
summarize - Application
- Determine, develop, compute, chart, utilize
- Analysis
- Correlate, diagram, distinguish, outline, infer
- Evaluation
- Compare contrast, critique, justify, conclude
- Synthesis
- Adapt, combine, compare, contrast, design,
generate
24Complex Versus Simple Objectives
- One complex objective versus several simple ones?
- High-level versus low-level objectives
- Example
- One complex objective (4 or 5 weeks of classes)
- Given a verbal description of a digital module,
develop an implementation using any of 7
different logic devices - 15 to 20 simpler objectives (1 or 2 per class)
- Given a verbal description, draw the truth
table - Given a truth table, obtain a minimum-cost
equation -
- Draw the the NAND-gate implementation for an
equation
25Comparison Of Complex Simple Objectives
- Multiple simple objectives
- More manageable chunks for students
- Explicit objective(s) for each class
- Simple (more manageable) homework problems and
test questions - Single complex objective
- Student's attention directed to the overall
process - May lead to higher level learning
- Students must deal with complexity
- Students must subdivide problem on their own
26Advantages Of Simple Objectives
- Advantages of simple objectives are more
important in - Large classes rather than small classes
- Introductory courses rather than advanced courses
27How To Deal With Understand In Objectives
- How do you write objectives when you want
students to understand a complex concept,
system, or process - Identify specific tasks that indicate
understanding - Specify objectives for each task
- Similar comments apply to know, appreciate,
value
28How To Deal With Understand In Objectives --
Example
- In our computer architecture course we want
students to understand a sample architecture
made up of several modules - What would students be able to do if they
understood - Objectives
- Students should be able to identify
- All the modules and interconnecting signals
- Modules involved in a given system-level
operation - Output values for a given input values for each
module - Sub-module changes given a system level change
29Writing Objectives Piecemeal Approach
- Writing low-level objectives for a whole course
may be overwhelming - Use a piecemeal approach
- Write your lectures and define the homework as
usual - After each class -- write down what you expect
the students to be able to do - These become a list of objectives
- Give them to the students before each exam
- Use them to write the exam
- As semester progresses -- may become comfortable
writing the objectives before you prepare your
lecture
30Evolving Objectives
- In a 3-credit semester course
- Russ Pimmel (UA, now NSF) started with over 100
objectives - Four offerings later -- down to about 50
- Eliminated peripheral stuff that was not
central - Broadening, informational, perspective material
31Objectives and Homework Assignments
- Homework assignments should match objectives
- Students need to practice and explore the skills,
knowledge, and attitudes defined in objectives - Frequently require supplementary homework
problems - In some of my courses
- 1/3 of homework is from textbook
- Rest are supplementary problems
- With well defined objectives
- Writing homework problems is straightforward
- Same is true for exam questions
32Students Use Of Objectives
- Survey in 400-level required course
- Did you find the objectives helpful?
- Yes --- 52
- No ---- 48
- Did you read the objectives?
- Frequently ------ 22
- Occasionally -- 37
- Never ------------- 41
33Team Exercise -- Guidelines For Learning
Objectives
- Task
- Write 3 or 5 guidelines for good learning
objectives - What are the common features?
- What should objectives look like?
- Think of guidelines as specifications
- Methodology
- Brain storm individually -- 2 minutes
- Establish consensus as a team -- 5 minutes
- Report team results -- 3 minutes
- Revise guidelines as a team-- 2 minutes
34Team Exercise
- Must be testable and measurable
- Achievable
- Clearly and precisely articulated
- Appropriate to course and audience
- Relate to program objectives
- Linked to course outcomes to allow for assessment
- Simple, one sentence, common format
- Simple better than complex
- Should be specific and unambiguous
- Relate to topic coverage
35Learning Objectives
- Preparing Learning Objectives
- Session Objectives
- At the end of the session, participants will
- Write learning objectives for one or more courses
that they teach - Describe themselves as more confident in their
ability to describe quality learning objectives.
36EC Program Outcomes
- (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics,
science, and engineering - (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments,
as well as to analyze and interpret data - (c) an ability to design a system, component, or
process to meet desired needs - (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary
teams - (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve
engineering problems - (f) an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility - (g) an ability to communicate effectively
- (h) the broad education necessary to understand
the impact of engineering solutions in a global
and societal context - (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning - (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues
- (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and
modern engineering tools necessary for
engineering practice.
37Blooms Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning
- Knowledge defines, recalls, matches, reproduces
- Comprehension explains, gives examples
- Application discovering, assessing, computing
- Analysis breaking down, organizing, inferring
- Synthesis creating, putting together
- Evaluation appraising, judging, selecting
Western Michigan University, 25 October 2002,
Kalamazoo, Michigan
38Challenges in Engineering Education
- Challenges
- Challenge of lifelong learning
- Challenge of problem solving
- Challenge of engineering design
- Challenge of transfer
39LASSI SCALE ENGR111 (Mean) CVEN349 (Mean) Significance
Skill Component
Information Processing 60.68 60.29 0.930
Test Strategies 64.33 63.27 0.794
Selecting Main Ideas 55.18 59.29 0.342
Will Component
Anxiety 60.52 67.12 0.147
Attitude 42.47 34.56 0.080
Motivation 63.30 59.29 0.397
Self-regulation Component
Concentration 61.31 54.56 0.144
Self-testing 52.47 37.92 0.006
Study Aids 60.24 45.04 0.005
Time Management 55.23 47.65 0.134
40Lifelong Learning at Penn State
Self-Directed Learning Readiness Survey (SDLRS),
Guglielmino Associates, http//www.guglielmino73
4.com/prod01.htm, March 2003. 27
Although the data suggest a slight upward upward
trend, the trend proved not to be statistically
significant based upon an analysis of variance
(ANOVA). Thus the cross-sectional study did not
find evidence of an increase in readiness for
self-directed learning, even for students in the
later semesters who are taking elective courses
and their capstone courses. Litzinger, T., Wise,
J., Lee, S., and Bjorklund, S. (2003) Assessing
Readiness for Self-directed Learning,
Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference
41Challenge of Problem Solving
- Despite individual professors dedication and
efforts to develop problem solving skill,
general problem solving skill was not developed
in the four years in our undergraduate program.
Students graduated showing the same inability
that they had when they started the program. Some
could not create hypotheses some misread problem
statements. During the four-year undergraduate
engineering program studied, 1974-1978, the
students had worked over 3000 homework problems,
they had observed about 1000 sample solutions
being worked on the board by either the teacher
or by peers, and they had worked many open-ended
problems. In other words, they showed no
improvement in problem solving skills despite the
best intentions of their instructors.
Woods, D. et al (1997) Developing Problem
Solving Skills The McMaster Problem Solving
Program, Journal of Engineering Education,
42Challenge of Problem Solving
- Ineffective approach 1. give the students
open-ended problems to solve This, we now see,
is ineffective because the students get little
feedback about the process steps, they tend to
reinforce bad habits, they do not know what
processes they should be using and they resort to
trying to collect sample solutions and match past
memorized sample solutions to new problem
situations.
43Challenge of Problem Solving
- Ineffective approach 2 Show them how you solve
problems by working many problems on the board
and handing out many sample solutions - This, we now see, is ineffective because teachers
know too much. Teachers demonstrate "exercise
solving". Teachers do not make mistakes they do
not struggle to figure out what the problem
really is. They work forwards not backwards from
the goal. They do not demonstrate the "problem
solving" process they demonstrate the "exercise
solving" process. If they did demonstrate
"problem solving" with all its mistakes and
trials, the students would brand the teacher as
incompetent. We know we tried!
44Challenge of Problem Solving
- Ineffective approach 3 Have students solve
problems on the board - Different students use different approaches to
solving problems what works for one won't work
for others. When we used this method as a
research tool, the students reported "we learned
nothing to help us solve problems by watching
Jim, Sue and Brad solve those problems!"
45Challenge of Problem Solving
- Through four research projects we identified why
and how these and other teaching methods failed
to develop process skills and which methods were
successful in developing the skills - Woods, D.R., J.D. Wright, T.W. Hoffman, R.K.
Swartman and I.D. Doig (1975) "Teaching Problem
Solving Skills," Annals of Engineering Education,
1, 1, 238-243. - Woods, D.R. et al. (1979) "Major Challenges to
Teaching Problem Solving" Annals of Engineering
Education, 70, No. 3 p. 277 to 284, 1979 and "56
Challenges to Teaching Problem Solving" CHEM 13
News no. 155 (1985). - Woods, D.R. (1993a) "Problem solving - where are
we now?" J. College Science Teaching, 22,
312-314. - Woods, D.R. (1993b) "Problem solving - what
doesn't seem to work," J. College Science
Teaching, 23, 57-58. - Woods, D.R. (1993c) "New Approaches for
developing problem solving skills," J. College
Science Teaching, 23, 157-158.
46Challenge of Engineering Design
- The literature is filled with positive comments
from students, instructors, and industrial
sponsors who have participated in capstone design
courses. The vast majority of participants feel
that the course benefited all involved. - The nature of capstone design courses, however,
often leads to a purely subjective evaluation
with little or no hard evidence of actual
benefits. Born, for example, does not attempt to
prove the value of senior level design courses.
He simply states that he is convinced from his
experiences that such courses are valuable. Other
educators have similar feelings as to the
relative costs and benefits of capstone design
courses.
Dutson, A.J., Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P.,
Sorensen, C.D., (1997) A Review of Literature on
Teaching Engineering Design Through
Project-Oriented Capstone Courses. Journal of
Engineering Education
47Challenge of Transfer
- Researches posed this problem to people.
- "Suppose you are a doctor faced with a patient
who has a malignant tumor in his stomach. It is
impossible to operate on the patient, but unless
the tumor is destroyed the patient will die.
There is a kind of ray that can be used to
destroy the tumor. If the rays reach the tumor
all at once at a sufficiently high intensity, the
tumor will be destroyed. Unfortunately, at this
intensity the healthy tissue that the rays pass
through on the way to the tumor will also be
destroyed. At lower intensities the rays are
harmless to healthy tissue, but they will not
affect the tumor either. What type of procedure
might be used to destroy the tumor with the rays,
and at the same time avoid destroying the health
tissue?"
48Challenge of Transfer
- Consider the following story
- "A small country was ruled from a strong fortress
by a dictator. The fortress was situated in the
middle of the country, surrounded by farms and
villages. Many roads led to the fortress through
the countryside. A rebel general vowed to
capture the fortress. The general knew that an
attack by his entire army would capture the
fortress. He gathered his army at the head of
one of the roads, ready to launch a full-scale
direct attack. However, the general then learned
that the dictator had planted mines on each of
the roads. The mines were set so that small
bodies of men could pass over them safely, since
the dictator need to move his troops and workers
to and from the fortress. However, any large
force would detonate the mines. Not only would
this blow up the road, but it would also destroy
many neighboring villages. It therefore seemed
impossible to capture the fortress. However, the
general devised a simple plan. He divided his
army into small groups and dispatched each group
to the head of a different road. When all was
ready he gave the signal and each group marched
down a different road. Each group continued down
it road to the fortress at the same time. In
this way, the general captured the fortress and
overthrew the dictator."
49Challenge of Transfer
- After the subjects read and summarized this
story, they were asked to solve the tumor problem
under the guise of a separate experiment. - Given the clear analogy, you might think that
performance would be near ceiling. Surprisingly,
only 30 of the subjects offered a convergence
solution. - Moreover, when these same subjects were given the
suggestion that they should use the General
story, 80 provided a convergence solution. - This finding demonstrates that half the subjects
could apply the General story to the tumor
problem when they were instructed to but did not
do so on their own.
50Focusing Activity (8 minutes)
- INDIVIDUALLY use 3 minutes to write your
description of learning, what it is, what it
looks like, how you might recognize when it has
occurred, etc. - AS A PAIR use 5 minutes to discuss descriptions
with someone sitting next to you. If you have
additional time, develop a consensus description
of learning.
51Focusing Activity
52Individual Exercise -- Writing Learning Objectives
- Individually write a set of objectives for a
topic representing a few classes - Something that you recently did in class
- Follow your teams guidelines
- Questions to consider about your objectives
- Do they define student behavior?
- Are they observable, measurable?
- Can you write homework exam problems?
- Are they consistent with the instructors intent?
- Time 15 minutes
53Team Exercise -- Reviewing Learning Objectives
- Review each others objectives
- Questions to consider in reviewing objectives
- Do they follow your teams guidelines
- Do they define student behavior?
- Are they observable, measurable?
- Can you write homework problems exam questions?
- Are they consistent with the instructors intent?
- 15 minutes
54Individual Exercise -- Revising Your Learning
Objectives
- Rewrite your learning objectives based on your
teams review - Report on biggest improvement
- 10 minutes
55Biggest Improvement
- Put quantifiable goals that students would
achieve - Clarify my objectives
- Classify learning objectives to go from basic to
specific - Make a different level of objectives from whole
course to chapter to each lecture - Make few higher level objective to organize
multiple lower level objectives to support - Identify more complex goals and separate into
simpler components for teaching communications - Improve clarity
- Make more understandable to the student
- Use proper verbiage to clarify
56Minute Paper
- Write a one-sentence answer to the following
question - What is the muddiest point about learning
objectives? - (What is the most confusing point?)
57Muddiest Point
- How to incorporate those that relate to attitude
and enthusiasm for lifelong learning - Why do we spend time writing things that we do
and we do best? - Answer to my question about the level and number
of learning objectives that are appropriate for
publication in my syllabus. Are there
intermediate not published objectives? - How to relate a given objective to Blooms
Taxonomy level, and how important is it to do so? - Ways of measuring each learning objective
- How many objectives should be used level of
detail then how do we practically measure them? - Being brief vs. Being precise and accurate
- Being able to link objectives to larger program
outcomes or goals - Organizing subject matter to achieve learning
objectives
58Team Exercise -- Reflection on Learning Objectives
- Assume that you are a debate team
- Write the single best pro and con arguments for
the statement - Using learning objectives improves student
leaning.
59 60Feedback on Learning Objectives
61Agenda
- Background for classroom assessment
- Specifications for assessment processes/tools
- Team exercise develop a set of specifications
for assessment processes/tools - Workshop exercise improve sets of specifications
for assessment processes/tools - Generating alternatives for assessment
processes/tools - Team exercises select some learning objectives
and generate alternative assessment
processes/tools - Background on alternatives for assessment
processes/tools - Selecting assessment processes/tools
- Individual exercise select a set of learning
objectives and generate alternative assessment
processes/tools - Individual exercise select one or more
assessment processes/tools that you would use in
your course - Team exercise share and review choices of
assessment processes/tools - Review workshop activities
62Classroom Assessment
- Background for Classroom Assessment
Session Objective At the end of the session,
participants will describe themselves as more
confident in their ability to hold productive
conversations with their colleagues regarding the
place and importance of assessment instruments
and processes in the teaching-learning process
63Pre-Assessment
- Exercise
- Classroom Assessment
- Individual
- Write a one-sentence answer to the following
question - What can you do in the last few minutes of class
to determine how well your class learned what you
taught that day?
64Classroom Assessment
- At end of session, participants will be able to
- Define several classroom assessment tools
- Discuss the importance of using classroom tools
in the teaching-learning process - Write assessment tools for their classes
65Resources on the Web
- www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-1.htm - www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-2.htm - www.siue.edu/deder/assess/catmain.html
66Types Of Assessment
- Assessment
- Used in many contexts
- Used for several different foci
- Classroom
- Teacher focus concerns your performance
- Student focus concerns their individual
performances - Program
- Alumni (as a group) focus ABET Criterion 2
- Graduates (as a group) focus ABET Criterion 3
- Individual graduate focus Comprehensive exams
67Types Of Assessment
- Classroom, teacher focus
- Question -- How effective was a lecture,
assignment, lab? - Tools -- One-minute paper, student survey
- Classroom, student focus
- Question Did a specific student achieve the
learning objectives? - Tools -- Exams, reports, presentation
- Program, graduates (as a group) focus
- Question -- How well did a group of students
achieve a set of objectives (outcomes) in a
program or course? - Tools -- Standardized tests, design project
report analysis
68Classroom Assessment
- Two fundamental questions
- How well are learners learning?
- How effectively are teachers teaching?
- Deals with better learning and more effective
teaching - Provides feedback about effectiveness as teachers
- How students learn
- How they respond to particular teaching
approaches. - Gives students a measure of their progress as
learners
Modified from www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committe
es/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/assess-1.htm
69Incorrect Assumptions About Teaching Learning
- Instructors assume students learn what they teach
- Tests, concept inventories, and term papers
provide disappointing evidence to the contrary - Students have not learned as much or as well as
expected - Gaps between what was taught and what was learned
- Sometimes considerable gaps
- Instructors notice gaps too late to remedy the
problems - Classroom assessment can uncover gaps earlier
www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-1.htm
70Classroom AssessmentGetting Started
- Planning
- Select one, and only one, of your classes
- Choose a simple and quick technique
- Implementing
- Make sure the students understand the procedure
- Analyze students responses as soon as possible
- Responding -- Close the feedback loop
- Tell students what you learned and what you will
do about it - motivates students to become
actively involved
www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-1.htm
71Classroom Assessment Five Suggestions
- Dont use any technique that does not appeal to
you - Don't make it into a self-inflicted chore or
burden. - Try it yourself before you use it with students
- Allow more time than you think you will need
- To carry out the assessment
- To respond to it
- Make sure to "close the loop"
- Let students know
- What you learned from their feedback
- How you and they can use that information to
improve learning
www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-1.htm
72Team Exercise
- Process
- Brain storm individually -- 1 minutes
- Establish consensus as a team -- 4 minutes
- Task Write 2 to 4 guidelines for good classroom
assessment tools (Think of guidelines as
specifications) - What are the common features?
- What should they look like?
- Do all guidelines have to apply to all tools?
73Team Exercise
- Tool should be efficient use of time for
instructor and class - Easy for students to use
- Can be used across different classes and
situations - Built into teaching methodology and doesnt look
like an add-on - Tied to learning objectives or limited number of
topics - Flexible, not dependent on particular technology
- Done repeatedly throughout semester
- Easy for faculty to administer and evaluate
- Self-documenting, easy to show results to others
- Clear and precise instructions
74Team Exercise
- Process
- Brain storm individually -- 2 minutes
- Generate different ideas as a team -- 3 minutes
- Task Generate as many possible good classroom
assessment tools that might satisfy your team
guidelines - Generate different ideas
75Team Exercise
- Muddiest point
- Quizzes on specific objectives
- What is clear?/What is unclear?
- What did you learn today?
- Strengths/Improvements/Insights (SII)
- Self or peer assessment
- Who did you share X with today?
- Weekly feedback on homework instruction what
was clear? What was unclear? - Continuous Improvement What was beneficial?
What would you change?
76Team Exercise
- Process
- Brain storm individually -- 2 minutes
- Generate different ideas as a team -- 3 minutes
- Task Generate as many possible good classroom
assessment tools where the student work product
is primarily graphical and the tools might
satisfy your team guidelines - Generate different ideas
77Team Exercise
- List topics with smiling/frowning faces
- Flow charts/flow sheets
- Process flow of your problem solving process
- Road map to get from A to B
- Bar graph of confidence related to specific
objective - Free body diagram
- Web of association to a particular term
- Story board of set up or explanation of
particular concept - Fit concept into network or tree of concepts
- Draw a concept
78Examples of Assessment Techniques
- Background Knowledge Probe
- Students respond to short-answers or
multiple-choice questions - General information on their level of preparation
- Minute Paper (most widely used)
- Students write brief response to
- "What was the most important thing you learned
during this class?" - What important question remains unanswered?
www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-2.htm
79Examples of Assessment Techniques (Cont.)
- Muddiest Point (simplest technique, remarkably
efficient) - Students jot down a quick response to one
- "What was the muddiest point in ....... ?
- A lecture, a discussion, a homework assignment
- One-Sentence Summary
- Students answer the questions "Who does what to
whom, when, where, how, and why?" (WDWWWWHW) - Synthesize answers into a simple, informative,
grammatical sentence.
www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-2.htm
80Examples of Assessment Techniques (Cont.)
- What's the Principle?
- Students state the principle that best applies to
a few problems
www.hcc.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/g
uidebk/teachtip/assess-2.htm
81Concept Map
- A concept map is a set of nodes that represent
concepts connected by a labeled links that
describe a link between concepts.
Concept A
Describe how concept A and concept B are related?
Concept B
82Team ExerciseBuilding a Concept Map
- Start with a subset of the concepts on the
following page and construct a concept map that
shows the concepts you have selected and how they
are related. - Exchange concept maps and share insights
83FeedbackDerivativeFinite Element
AnalysisIntegralLinear MomentumAngular
MomentumEnergyInterestMassIdeal Gas
LawFicks First LawFicks Second LawVectors
Dot ProductVectors Cross ProductOrdinary
Differential EquationsKirchoffs Voltage
LawSecond Law of ThermodynamicsKirchoffs
Current LawModelingProblem-SolvingForceOhms
LawResistanceComplex NumbersLogarithmic
FunctionElectric FluxDecision
TheoryDivergenceIndirect CostCapacitanceBendin
g MomentFeedback
First Law of ThermodynamicsEntropyHeatElectric
FieldMagnetic FieldPartial Differential
EquationsDeterminantsReturn on
InvestmentPhasorsBrainstormingExponential
FunctionConductivityChemical KineticsSpecific
HeatElasticityMalleabilityPlasticityResiliency
PermittivityCurrentElectric PotentialCurlPres
entation SkillsDemocracyProfitDensityMolecule
PhaseShearRheology Frequency
ResponseEigenvalue, Eigenvector
Sinusoidal FunctionsWorkDisplacementVelocityAc
celerationResistivityLeadershipHess
LawZeroth Law of ThermodynamicsElectric
PotentialMagnetic FluxDesignMaxwells
EquationsPowerDuctilitySpring
ConstantStressStrainPartial DerivativePermeabi
lityChargeMagnetic PotentialGradientParagraph
Rate of ReturnFrequencyAtomRoot
LocusTorqueInductanceTorsionPolymerKinetic
Theory of Gases
84Cowans Teaching Examples
- Bridge design
- Design and build two different bridges and grade
on the lower performance design - Problem-solving script
- Illustrate script for one type of problem, ask
students to develop a script for another type of
problem
Cowan, J. (1998) On Becoming an Innovative
University Teacher Reflection in Action.
Buckingham SRHE and Open University Press.
85- Some Personal Observations
86Relating Student Performance On Exams To
Objectives
- Write exam using objectives
- Select objectives for exam questions from list
- Many objectives -- test questions represent a
sample - Exam question may involve more than one objective
- Use some hard and some easy questions
- Identify questions ( objectives) a high
percentage missed - Review idea in class -- give additional work
- Modify lecture, reading, or homework for future
- Change the objective
87Using Cooperative Learning In-class Exercises
- Examine students work during the in-class
exercise - If all have a good approach -- may be wasting
time - If all are lost -- may need more explanation
- If one-half to two-thirds have a good approach --
level and pace are right - Collect and show a few solutions to in-class
exercises - If all have correct approach -- may be wasting
time - If all are wrong -- may need more explanation
- If one or two are correct -- level and pace are
right
88One-Minute Papers
- Common questions
- What one thing should be changed about ____?
- What one thing should not be changed about ____?
- What do you think about ____?
- What is the muddiest point about ____ ?
- Ask about
- Course or lecture
- Text or chapter
- Assignment or test
- Teaching style or class activity
89 Some Colleagues Observations
90Informal Assessment Techniques
- General Guidelines
- Keep them anonymous
- Use then frequently better feedback
- Close the loop
- Let students know results of the process
- David Cordes
91Informal Assessment Techniques - Daily Activities
- One-minute paper
- At the end of the lecture, ask students for
- The most important topic that we covered today
- The one topic you are still confused about
- Single sheet of paper, no names
- Can read on the way back to the office
- Look for common problems
- Look for did they understand my focus?
-
- David Cordes
92ME 360 - Plus / Delta Assessment 1
- On one side of sticky pad
- Put a in upper left hand corner
- What is something that worked well or made more
sense in lab this week? - On other side of sticky pad
- Put a D in upper left hand corner
- What is something that could have been done
better in lab this week? - Stick on the door on your way out
- Joey Parker
93ME 372 - 1st Day of Class
- What are a valid set of units for a mass moment
of inertia? (Dynamics concept) - What is the difference between a capacitor and a
resistor? (Circuits concept) - What is the equation of the straight line that
passes through the points X2, Y7 and X7, Y2?
(Math concept) - Joey Parker
94Team Exercise
- Process
- Brain storm individually -- 2 minutes
- Establish consensus as a team -- 5 minutes
- Report team results -- 3 minutes
- Revise products as a team -- 2 minutes
- Task Write 3 to 5 guidelines for good classroom
assessment tools (Think of guidelines as
specifications) - What are the common features?
- What should they look like?
- Do all guidelines have to apply to all tools?
95Team Exercise
- Simple, quick, easy to administer and evaluate
- Provide immediate feedback to students they
need to know youre using the results - Tied to a specific topic or objective
- Gives usable, valuable information
- Identification of strengths and areas of
improvement - Give clear and precise instruction to the student
- Using graphical and textual feedback
- Result in action
96Team Exercise
- Process
- Brain storm individually -- 2 minutes
- Establish consensus as a team -- 5 minutes
- Report team results -- 3 minutes
- Revise products as a team -- 2 minutes
- Task Generate as many possible good classroom
assessment tools that might satisfy your team
guidelines - Generate different ideas that you have generated
or have seen
97Team Exercise
- Ask students to identify an application based on
concept presented in class - Person A teaches Person B, and then they write
what was hard to convey and what was hard to
learn - Identify an objective for class and rate their
comfort level with number or bar graph - Ask student to give example to transfer example
in class to another context - Students examine 2-3 methods/opinions/processes
for similar purposes, ask groups to analyze
similarities and differences, solicit results,
and then invent their own that combines
methods/opinions/processes - Ask students to identify concept based on a
diagram. - Ask students to write problem that could be
solved by concept presented in class
98Individual Exercise
- Individually write a set of assessment tools for
a class or a topic representing a few classes - Follow your guidelines
- Consider the following questions about your tool
- Can your students understand the task?
- Can your students do the task quickly?
- Can you analyze the results quickly?
- Can you summarize and report the results easily?
- Does it assess student learning?
- 5 minutes
99Team Exercise
- Review each others objectives and assessment
tools - Consider the following questions
- Does the tool follow your guidelines?
- Can your students understand the task?
- Can your students do the task quickly?
- Can you analyze the results quickly?
- Can you summarize and report the results easily?
- Does it assess student learning?
- 15 minutes
100Individual Exercise
- Rewrite your assessment tools based on your
teams review - Identify the major improvement
- 5 minutes
101Minute Paper
- Write a one-sentence answer to the following
question - What is the muddiest point about classroom
assessment?
102Individual Exercise
- How can students be more involved in assessing
each other, as well as the self-assessment we
have largely concentrated on, and do this in
reasonable time. - How often is a reasonable amount of assessment?
How much is too much? - Going from creating an assessment tool to
actually implementing the assessment. - Incorporation of feedback will not be every time
easy and straight forward - Will students see the value of classroom
assessment? Yes, with good approaches. Yes, with
good feedback. - Being able to design a clear, concise assessment
tool that is both beneficial to students and
professor
103Team Exercise
- Assume that you are a debate team
- Write the single best pro and con arguments for
the statement - Using classroom assessment tools improves
student learning.
104Workshop Objectives Action Items
- Recall objectives
- At end of session, participants will be able to
define, discuss, write - Learning objectives for their courses
- Assessment tools for their classes
- Workshop provided a structure for experience in
writing - Learning objectives
- Assessment tools
- Your charge In one of your courses next
semester use - Learning objectives
- Classroom assessment tools
105 106- Some Personal Observations