JMSC6027: Chinas Relationships - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

JMSC6027: Chinas Relationships

Description:

1) In opinion polls over many years, a big majority of ... But Beijing also suppressed Tibet's politics, identity, culture and, to an extent, its Buddhism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: thwp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: JMSC6027: Chinas Relationships


1
  • JMSC6027 Chinas Relationships
  • With Taiwan,
    Tibet
  • Thomas Hon Wing Polin
  • Journalism and Media Studies Centre, HKU
  • April 30, 2003

2
Taiwan (1)
  • BACKGROUND
  • Major Chinese settlements began in Ming Dynasty
    (1368-1644) Taiwan incorporated into China in
    1683 by Qing Dynasty emperor Kangxi
  • Crucially, except in 1945-49, Taiwan was not
    under direct rule from mainland since its cession
    to Japan after the 1894-95 Sino-Japanese War
  • Result Estrangement between mainland and island,
    which was intensified by 3 factors --

3
Taiwan (2)
  • 1) Relatively constructive Japanese rule For
    half a century, Japan helped develop the islands
    economy, infrastructure and education. In Taiwan,
    the Japanese were less brutal occupiers than they
    were in the rest of Asia during WW II
  • 2) Harshness of KMT (mainlander) rule Especially
    under Chiang Kai-shek, notably the 1947 Feb. 28
    massacre of Taiwanese

4
Taiwan (3)
  • 3) Taiwanese identity Nurtured by its growing
    wealth and pride in recent years (the economic
    miracle), the island developed a sense of
    identity distinct from the mainlands
  • This fostered the rise of the nativist Democratic
    Progressive Party and its electoral victories,
    culminating in Chen Shui-bians presidential win
    in 2000
  • Also helped splinter and defeat the KMT, which
    was seen to represent the mainland legacy

5
Taiwan (4)
  • In recent years, such growing nativist and
    pro-independence sentiment, combined with
    occasional gestures of apparent support from the
    U.S. (transit visits for Taiwan leaders, arms
    sales, etc.), has alarmed Beijing
  • Result Deeper suspicions across the Taiwan
    Strait, no talks, little progress on issues of
    common concern

6
Taiwan (5)
  • The Big Question Will all this lead eventually
    to Taiwan independence?
  • The answer No
  • The reasons
  • 1) In opinion polls over many years, a big
    majority of Taiwan people have consistently
    expressed their preference for a vague status
    quo a pragmatic view

7
Taiwan (6)
  • 2) Independence will lead to military attack by
    China. Reason is simple Whatever the
    consequences of military action, no Beijing
    regime can afford to go down in history as having
    lost Taiwan. Such a regime, inevitably, will
    fall
  • 3) The U.S. will not back Taiwan independence.
    Not even this extreme-rightwing, trigger-happy
    Bush administration. Reason is also simple No
    U.S. administration can afford to poison
    relations with China for the next 50 years, on an
    issue that does not directly threaten U.S.
    national security

8
Taiwan (7)
  • 4) Even more important are the rapidly growing
    economic ties between mainland and island. To
    continue to thrive (and perhaps even just
    survive), Taiwans economy needs Chinas more
    than the other way around
  • 5) Economic ties lead to personal, social and
    cultural ties. More than a million Taiwan people
    now live in the mainland. Over time, almost
    inevitable that such trends will lead to closer
    political ties

9
Taiwan (8)
  • If independence for Taiwan is most improbable,
    what about reunification?
  • Whatever Beijing says or does, forceful
    unification, initiated by Beijing, is not on the
    cards. Whatever the military feasibilities, the
    overall price is simply too high
  • Reunification, under some loose, federal-type
    arrangement, may eventually be possible. But it
    will not happen until the mainlands political
    system and civil-rights regime have evolved into
    something a lot more like Taiwans own

10
Taiwan (9)
  • The Taiwan question has a major impact on Chinas
    two most important foreign relationships with
    the U.S. and with Japan
  • United States For China, Taiwan always has been
    THE issue in ties with the U.S. Nearly all the
    biggest quarrels between the two stem from
    Taiwan. Different U.S. administrations tend to
    adjust, tinker with Washingtons position of
    balance between Beijing and Taipei. None,
    however, openly strays from the one-China
    principle

11
Taiwan (10)
  • Japan 50 years of colonial rule mean a
    significant Japanese legacy in Taiwan. Many
    older-generation Taiwanese remain fond of Japan
    (e.g., Lee Teng-hui). Rightwing Japanese
    politicians have long favored closer ties with
    Taiwan
  • This feeds Beijings latent suspicion that Japan
    still wants to influence Taiwan or even somehow
    separate the island from China ? tensions

12
Taiwan (11)
  • Looking ahead, key event to watch is Taiwans
    next presidential election, in 2004
  • If Chen Shui-bian wins a second term,
    cross-strait relations likely to remain mired in
    mutual suspicion, without major progress on key
    issues
  • But if Lien Chan James Soong win (in 2000,
    running separately, the pair took 60 of the
    vote, against Chens 39), look for significant
    progress toward better ties with China

13
Taiwan (12)
  • The reason is China feels much more comfortable
    with Lien and Soong, both of whom are openly
    committed to the principle of one China and
    eventual reunification
  • If Lien-Soong wins, Beijing likely to make a few
    quick concessions to show its sincerity
  • Progress is also likely on san tong, as well as
    closer business and political ties. Beijing may
    selective allow Taiwan more of the international
    space that Taipei has long craved

14
Tibet (1)
  • Like Taiwan, Tibet has long been a major
    political thorn in Chinas side
  • Unlike Taiwan, Tibet has a very different
    culture, language and ethnicity from China
  • Tibet-China relations date back some 1,400 years.
    Despite loose political associations (and Tibets
    acknowledgement of Chinese suzerainty in the Qing
    Dynasty), China did not directly rule Tibet until
    the PLA marched in in 1950

15
Tibet (2)
  • After an armed uprising failed in 1959, the
    current Dalai Lama and many of his followers fled
    to northern India, where they set up a
    government-in-exile in Dharamsala
  • For Tibet, Chinese rule brought much economic
    development and new infrastructure. Beijing also
    modernized local education, agriculture and
    healthcare
  • But Beijing also suppressed Tibets politics,
    identity, culture and, to an extent, its Buddhism

16
Tibet (3)
  • As the Tibetan diaspora fanned out across the
    world, their political cause as well as Tibetan
    Buddhism gained a substantial following in the
    West
  • For many years, Tibet has been a big headache and
    embarrassment for China internationally demos
    follow Chinese leaders wherever they travel,
    Tibet is a favorite cause of international
    human-rights groups as well as movie stars, etc.

17
Tibet (4)
  • Moreover, Tibet has been a huge drain on China,
    in terms of money and resources devoted to the
    regions development and control. In economic
    terms, Tibet is a never-ending subsidy
  • So will Beijing conceivably, as some people have
    suggested, just let Tibet go one day?

18
Tibet (5)
  • That is unlikely, for 2 reasons --
  • 1) Nations almost never give up longstanding
    territorial claims, especially such territory
    that they already control
  • 2) More important, perhaps, is the strategic
    value of the Roof of the World to China. In
    Beijings view, if it does not control the
    region, Tibets weakness means that some other
    big power inevitably will come in to fill the
    vacuum

19
Tibet (6)
  • That power would then be able, from the Tibetan
    highland, to threaten the vast lowlands of
    western China.
  • Compare Beijings attitude with Israels
    sensitivity toward the Golan Heights of Syria
    and its steely determination to occupy the
    heights since the 1967 war

20
Tibet (7)
  • Issues to watch
  • 1) Will the growing Han Chinese presence in
    Tibet, as well as economic development,
    eventually absorb Tibet and its distinctiveness?
  • 2) Will Beijing do a deal with the Dalai Lama?
    That seems to make sense. The DL is a political
    moderate who has disavowed independence. He is in
    his late 60s, and Beijing has reason to worry
    that a new generation of exiled Tibetan leaders
    may be more radical and violence-oriented

21
Tibet (8)
  • These factors lend some urgency to the question
    of who will succeed the DL as the dominant
    Tibetan leader
  • The current favorite seems to be the Karmapa
    Lama, 18-year-old Urgyen Trinley. His dramatic
    escape from Tibet to India in 2000 captured
    world attention. He is reportedly charismatic and
    intelligent
  • But he has a rival, who claims to be the true
    Karmapa Lama Thaye Dorje, 20

22
Tibet (9)
  • So the relationship between the Dalai Lama and
    the rival Karmapa Lamas (the Dalai and the
    Karmapas come from different Tibetan sects) will
    be one key to Tibets future
  • The other, of course, is their complex and
    tangled relationships with Beijing
  • (This intriguing saga of political skullduggery
    and maneuvering is told in the Asiaweek story I
    assigned you.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com