Title: Set Up: Bureaucracies
1Set Up Bureaucracies
PS 202 -- American Political Institutions and
Processes
Fall 2001
2Inside the Box of BureaucracyFour Perspectives
on Organization
- Efficiency Maximizing Organizations with
Conforming Individuals - Max Weber (Sociology - legitimacy from legal
authority) - Ronald Coase (transaction cost and contractual
economics) - Inefficient Organizations with Utility Maximizing
Individuals - Anthony Downs (typology of bureaucrats
motivations) - William Niskanen, Gordon Tullock (social choice
formal models) - Organizations as Social Enterprises with
Satisficing Individuals - Herbert Simon (decision making and bounded
rationality) - Richard Cyert and James March (behavioral theory
of the firm) - Potential Integration New Economics of
Organization - Principal-Agent Theory (Information asymmetry,
adverse selection, moral hazard)
3Conventional View of the Executive Branch in
Government
Chief Executive
Cabinet (Department Heads)
The Bureaucracy
4Context Federal Bureaucracy in the Web of
Politics
Congress
Executive Authority
Statutory Authority, Appropriations
President
Tools ? Nominations ? Presidents Budget ?
Regulatory Review ? Privatization ? Devolution
Tools ? Creation ?Confirmations ?
Appropriations ? Oversight
Executive Branch Agencies
Political (Appointment) Executive
Levels I-Secretary II-Deputy Secretary III-Under
Secretary IV-Assistant Secretary V-General
Counsel, etc.
Senior Executive Service (SES) (up to 10 of
SES) Schedule C (GS-15 below) (policy
determining)
Career (Competitive Service) Senior Executive
Service (SES) (At least 90 of SES) GS Supergrade
16-18 GS 1-15
Public/Constituents
Interest Groups
5Four Images of Bureaucrat and Politician Roles
- Image I Policy/Administration
- Politicians Make Policy (Decision Making)
- Civil Servants Administer Policy (Implementation)
- Image II Facts/Interests
- Both Participate in Policy Making, But
- Politicians Bring Interests and Values (Political
Sensitivity) - Civil Servants Bring Facts and Knowledge (Neutral
Expertise) - Image III Energy/Equilibrium
- Both Participate in Policy Making, and Both
Concerned with Politics, But - Politicians Articulate Broad Interests of
Unorganized Individuals - Civil Servants Mediate Narrow, Focused Interests
of Organized Clienteles - Image IV The Pure Hybrid
- Bureaucratization of Politics
- Politicization of Bureaucracy
Joel Aberbach, Robert Putnam, and Bert Rockman,
Bureaucrats and Politicans in Western
Democracies, 1981.
6Nine Possible Roles of Bureaucrats and Politicians
Under Image I, Who Performs Which Roles?
Bureaucrats
Politicians
- Technician -- Solving technical problems and
applying specialized knowledge - Advocate -- Fighting for or representing the
interests of a class, group, or cause - Legalist -- Focusing on legal processes or
legalistic definitions of ones responsibilities - Broker -- Mediating or resolving political
conflicts and conflicts among interests - Trustee -- Representing the state, the general
interest - Facilitator -- Protecting the interests of
specific clientele groups or constituents - Partisan -- Focusing on partisan politics
- Policy Maker -- Focusing on formulating public
policy - Ombudsman -- Undertaking casework for individual
clients or constituents
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
?
X
formulating
X
Joel Aberbach, Robert Putnam, and Bert Rockman,
Bureaucrats and Politicans in Western
Democracies, 1981.
7Role Focus of Bureaucrats and Politicians in
Seven Western Democracies
Joel Aberbach, Robert Putnam, and Bert Rockman,
Bureaucrats and Politicans in Western
Democracies, 1981, Figure 4-1.
8Rank-Order Similarities in Bureaucratic and
Political Role Focus
Spearmans rho Coefficient
Country
.82
United States
.35
Sweden
Germany
.32
Britain
.31
.13
Netherlands
École Nationale DAdministration École
Polytecnique
.04
France
Italy
.03
Joel Aberbach, Robert Putnam, and Bert Rockman,
Bureaucrats and Politicans in Western
Democracies, 1981, Figure 4-2.
9Bureaucracy as a Political Structure
American public bureaucracy is not designed to
be effective. The bureaucracy arises out of
politics, and its design reflects the interests,
strategies, and compromises of those who exercise
political power.Choices about bureaucratic
structure are not matters that can be separated
off from political interests, to be guided by
technical criteria of efficiency and
effectiveness. Structural choices have important
consequences for the content and direction of
policy, and political actors know it. When they
make choices about structure, they are implicitly
making choices about policy. And precisely
because this is so, issues of structure get
caught up in the larger political struggle.
Terry Moe, The Politics of Bureaucratic
Structure, pp. 267-268.