The Process of Making a Decision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The Process of Making a Decision

Description:

Decision criterion understood Decision criterion unclear ... Includes focus on communication channels and relationships. Political Perspective ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: DrGeorge3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Process of Making a Decision


1
The Process of Making a Decision
2
Continuum of Decision Structures
3
Typology of Decisions
4
Keen and Scott Morton Classification of
Decision-Making Perspectives
  • Rational Manager Perspective
  • Classic conception of decision-making
  • Assumes rational, completely informed, individual
    DM
  • Favored perspective of proponents of cost/benefit
    analysis
  • Requires analytic definition of decision
    variables
  • Requires precise, objective criterion for choice
  • Process-Oriented Perspective
  • Focuses on how DM can effectively function with
    limited knowledge and skills
  • Emphasizes heuristics and search for solutions
    that are good enough
  • DSS design goal is to assist in improving
    existing solution not to seek the optimum

5
Keen and Scott Morton Classification of
Decision-Making Perspectives
  • Organizational Procedures Perspective
  • Seeks to understand decisions as output of
    standard operating procedures
  • Design goal is to determine which of these
    procedures might be supported or improved
  • Stresses identification of organizational roles
  • Includes focus on communication channels and
    relationships
  • Political Perspective
  • DM is viewed as a personalized bargaining process
    between business units
  • Assumes that power and influence determine the
    outcome of any decision
  • Design goal focuses upon the DM process rather
    than the decision itself
  • Individual Differences Perspective
  • Focuses on individual problem-solving behaviors
  • Design is contingent on DM style, background, and
    personality of intended user

6
Simons Model of Problem Solving
7
Modeling and Analysis Strategies
  • Satisficing Strategies
  • Simulation
  • Forecasting
  • What if Analysis
  • Markov Analysis
  • Complex Queuing Models
  • Environmental Impact Analysis
  • Optimizing Strategies
  • Linear Programming
  • Goal Programming
  • Simple Queuing Models
  • Investment Models
  • Inventory Models
  • Transportation Models

8
Problem Space and Search Space
9
Common Characteristics of Models of Choice
  • Unfamiliarity Degree to which decision task
    is foreign to DM
  • Ambiguity. Degree to which decision task is
    unclear to DM
  • Complexity. Number of different components to
    decision task
  • Instability. Degree to which decision
    components change during or after choice
  • Reversibility. Degree to which choice can be
    reversed if outcome appears undesirable
  • Significance. Importance of choice to both DM and
    the organization
  • Accountability. Degree to which DM is culpable
    for choice outcome
  • Time/Money. Constraints on decision process
    and solution set
  • Knowledge. Amount of relevant knowledge
    possessed by DM
  • Ability. Degree of intelligence and
    competence of DM
  • Motivation. Desire of DM to make a successful
    decision

10
Factors Contributing to Cognitive Limitations
  • Humans can retain only a few bits of information
    in short-term memory
  • Intelligence of the DM
  • DMs that embrace closed belief systems tend to
    inordinately restrict information search
  • DMs that employ a concrete thinking approach tend
    to be limited information processors
  • Propensity for risk. Risk takers require less
    information than risk avoiders
  • DM level of aspiration is positively correlated
    with desire for information
  • In general, older DMs appear to be more limited
    than younger ones

11
Common Perceptual Blocks
  • Difficulty in isolating the problem
  • Delimiting the problem space too closely
  • Inability to see the problem from various
    perspectives
  • Stereotyping
  • Saturation

12
Ways in Which Cognitive Limitations Can Affect
Judgment
  • Judgment is more dependent on preconceptions and
    bias than relevant new information
  • Intuitive judgments are often misleading
  • Availability is intuitive judgment about the
    frequency of events or proportion of objects
  • Representation attempts to classify concepts and
    is often illusive
  • Judgmental fixation describes the anchoring of an
    individual regarding consequences

13
Advantages of Heuristics in Problem-Solving
  • Simple to understand
  • Easy to implement
  • Require less conception time
  • Require less cognitive effort (human) or less CPU
    time (computer)
  • Can produce multiple solutions

14
Appropriate Uses of Heuristics in Problem-Solving
  • Where the input data are inexact or limited
  • The computation time for an optimal solution is
    excessive
  • Problems are being solved frequently and
    repeatedly and consume unnecessary time
  • Wherever symbolic rather than numerical
    processing is involved
  • Simulation models are oversimplified when
    compared to problem complexity
  • A reliable, exact method is not readily available
  • Where the efficiency of an optimization process
    can be improved by good starting solutions
  • Where optimization is economically infeasible

15
Common Biases of Individual Decision-Makers
  • They tend to overestimate low probabilities and
    underestimate high probabilities
  • They appear to be insensitive to the true sample
    size of their observations
  • They adjust their first estimate incrementally
    based on the basis of additional evidence
  • They tend toward over confidence in their ability
    to estimate probabilities
  • They tend to overestimate the ability of others
    to estimate probabilities
  • They tend to compare pairs of alternatives rather
    than a whole list
  • They tend to minimize reliance on explicit
    tradeoffs or other numerical computations
  • They often exhibit choices that are inconsistent
    and intransitive
  • They tend toward viewing alternatives as a set of
    aspects

16
Contributions to Effectiveness and Efficiency
From DSS Use
  • Effectiveness
  • Easier access to relevant information
  • Faster and more efficient problem recognition and
    identification
  • Easier access to computing tools and proven
    models to compute choice criteria
  • Greater ability to generate and evaluate large
    choice sets
  • Efficiency
  • Reduction in decision costs
  • Reduction in decision time for same level of
    detail in the analysis
  • Better quality in feedback supplied back to the
    DM.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com