Crossnational Ethics And - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Crossnational Ethics And

Description:

... government officials, official, political parties, and political candidates. ... political party, party official in order to secure or retain business in another ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: AbelAd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Crossnational Ethics And


1
Chapter 2
  • Cross-national Ethics And
  • Social Responsibility

2
Learning Objectives
  • Concept of ethics
  • Relationship with legality
  • Relationship with social acceptance
  • Issues and complications in complying with
    foreign ethical practices

3
Learning Objectives
  • History behind FCPA
  • The impact of the FCPA on MNCs
  • Social responsibility in a cross-national context

4
Ethical Behavior
  • Determining the difference between right and
    wrong.
  • Is the action legal?
  • Is the action socially acceptable?
  • Home country and host country rights and
    wrongs may lead to a conflict.
  • Consider bribery as an example.

5
Payoffs
  • Bribery.
  • Whitemail bribes.
  • This refers to payments made to induce an
    official in a position of power to give favorable
    treatment.
  • Lubrication bribes.
  • This type of bribe is typically described as a
    payment to facilitate, expedite, or speed routine
    government approvals.

6
Payoffs
  • Extortion.
  • Extortion is a force exerted by an official
    seeking payment from an individual or corporation
    for an action to which the individual or
    corporation may lawfully be entitled.

7
To Bribe Or Not To Bribe? Four Basic Questions
  • Legal questions
  • What are the legal consequences in the parent
    (home) country?
  • How comprehensive is the law of the local (host)
    country? How is the law enforced?
  • Will the corporation be liable to its competitors
    for financial damages (such as unfair practice or
    restraint of trade)?
  • Will the company be held liable by stockholders
    in the host or parent country?

8
To Bribe Or Not To Bribe? Four Basic Questions
  • Moral questions
  • What is the companys policy regarding payoffs?
    Will it cause any deviation from standard
    practice?
  • What is the custom in the host country?

9
To Bribe Or Not To Bribe? FOUR BASIC QUESTIONS
(Continued)
  • Economic questions
  • How does the expected gain compare with the
    companys total earnings?
  • Will the payoff trigger other host countries to
    make the same demand?
  • Will the payoff action cause retaliation from
    competitors?

10
To Bribe Or Not To Bribe? FOUR BASIC QUESTIONS
(Continued)
  • Personal questions
  • Am I likely to be held personally for such
    action?
  • Does the company carry insurance to pay my legal
    fees if I am found guilty of violating a law?
  • How would my family and friends react to
    disclosure of such activity?

11
The U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (FCPA) of
1977
  • Purpose of FCPA
  • To establish a worldwide code of conduct for any
    kind of payment by united states businesses to
    foreign government officials, official, political
    parties, and political candidates.
  • To require appropriate accounting controls for
    full disclosure of a firms transactions.

12
The U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (FCPA) of
1977
  • Basic provisions
  • It is a criminal offense for a firm to make
    payments to a foreign government officials,
    political party, party official in order to
    secure or retain business in another nation.

13
The U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (FCPA) of
1977
  • Sales commissions to independent agents are
    illegal if the business has knowledge that any
    party of the commission is being passed to a
    foreign official.

14
The U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (FCPA) of
1977
  • Government employees whose duties are essentially
    ministerial or clerical are excluded, so
    expediting payments to persons such as customs
    agents and bureaucrats are permitted. (Thus, the
    FCPA does not apply to small lubrication
    bribes).

15
The U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (FCPA) of
1977
  • In addition to the antibribery provisions that
    apply to all businesses, all publicly held
    corporations that are subject to the SEC are
    required to establish internal accounting
    controls to ensure that all payments abroad are
    authorized and properly recorded.

16
Complaints From MNCS Over The FCPA
  • Competitive disadvantage.
  • The accounting burden of internal controls.
  • FCPA forces them to become political tools of the
    U.S. Government.
  • Not clear enough with respect to the use of
    foreign subsidiaries to transact business.

17
An Alternative APRROACH To Payoffs
  • Many MNCs focus on enhancing their
    competitiveness by improving
  • Technical expertise
  • Custom service
  • Provision of quality

18
Cross-national Social Responsibility
  • Social responsibility is a notion that
    corporations have an obligation to constituent
    groups in society other than stock-holders and
    beyond that areprescribed by law or union
    contracts.

19
Cross-national Social Responsibility
  • Corporate social responsibility therefore means
    that a firms actions must take into account not
    only the well-being of the stockholders but also
    the well-being of the community, the employees,
    and the customers.

20
Challenge Of Ethics And Social RESPONSIBLITY
  • Cultural relativism.
  • Cultural relativism holds that no cultures
    ethics are any better than any others. There are
    no international rights or wrongs.
  • Problems example piracy of patents.

21
Challenge Of Ethics And Social RESPONSIBLITY
  • Universalism.
  • The concept of universalism, is a rigid global
    yardstick which measures all moral issues ( for
    example, the FCPA).
  • Problems example of union carbide.

22
Challenge Of Ethics And Social RESPONSIBLITY
  • What applies in the world?
  • As the integration of the global economy
    increases, effective international managers
    develop a better appreciation of the differences
    in the legal and cultural context of business
    ethics between the united states and other
    nations because the managers realize that
    universal application of ethics is not prevalent.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com