Title: Dynamics of planetary systems
1Dynamics of planetary systems
2Keplers laws
- The orbits of planets are ellipses with the Sun
in one focus - In equal times, the radius vector of a planet
sweeps out equal areas - The square of the period of revolution is
proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis
3Newtons law of gravity
- Conservative force field ? Energy integral
- Central force field ? Angular momentum integral
- Solution Conic section satisfying Keplers laws
4Keplers third law
- Exact form
- Approximate form
- The mean orbital velocity of a planet
5Exoplanet detectionexample of the Solar System
- Both the Sun and the planet are moving around the
center of mass - Suns orbital semimajor axis ? amp
- Suns orbital mean velocity ? vpmp
APPROXIMATELY!
6Solar System Planets
7Exoplanet mass determination
- Measure period P and radial velocity half
amplitude v? sin i - Identifying v? with v? sin i yields a lower limit
for Mp - Detection is easiest if P is short, vp is large
or M? is small
8Solar System planet mass determination
- For planets with natural satellites, classically
- Modern values rely on tracking of artificial
satellites or space probes, using accurate
distance and radial velocity from radio
communication
9Masses of small Solar System bodies
- Asteroids or TNOs with natural satellites
- Mutual perturbations of asteroid orbits
- Space probe rendezvous/orbiter missions to
asteroids - Nongravitational perturbations on comets
- Space probe impact experiment (Deep Impact)
10Orbital Elements
- a - semimajor axis
- e - eccentricity
- i - inclination w.r.t. the ecliptic
- ? - longitude of the ascending node
- ? - argument of perihelion
- T - time of perihelion passage
11Useful Relations
- Perihelion distance
- Aphelion distance
- Binding energy
- Speed of motion
- Angular momentum
12Planetary Perturbations (1)
- Small departures from Keplerian motion
- Direct perturbations caused by the acceleration
of the test body due to the perturbing planet - Indirect perturbations caused by the
acceleration exerted by the perturbing planet on
the Sun
13Planetary Perturbations (2)
- Perturbing function
- If M1 and R1 were zero, the orbital elements
would be constant - When M1 and R1 are small, the orbital elements
will vary slowly - Set up differential equations for the time
derivatives of (a,e,i,?,?,T), seek solutions that
are valid over as long time as possible
DIRECT
INDIRECT
14Stability of the Solar System
- Not guaranteed over infinite time (resonances,
chaos vs quasi-periodic motion) - KAM (Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser) theorem
Quasi-periodic motions dominate the phase space
if the perturbations are small enough - Nekhoroshev theorem Even if chaos exists, the
deviations from regular motion are bounded during
a finite time
15Proper Elements
- Over time spans of 105 yr
- a remains on the average constant
- e and i show periodic oscillations, coupled to
variations of ? and ?, respectively - (ep,ip) are proper elements
16Resonances
- Secular resonances Period of circulation of
(e,?) or (i,?) equals the corresponding for
Jupiter or Saturn - Mean motion resonances The mean motion 2?/P is
commensurable with that of Jupiter (e.g., 3/1) - Resonance overlapping causes rapid chaos
17Examples of Mean Motion Resonance
- Asteroid Main Belt Kirkwood gaps
- Outside the MB Hildas and Trojans
- Transneptunian Population Large group of
Plutinos
18Circular restricted 3-body problem (1)
- A massless body moves in the combined
gravitational field of the Sun and one planet,
and the orbit of the planet is circular - Lagrange points Equilibrium points for the
massless body in the rotating frame following the
planet
19Circular restricted 3-body problem (2)
- The force field in the rotating system is
conservative ? existence of an energy integral - v 0 zero-velocity surfaces
20Circular restricted 3-body problem (3)
- Largest closed zero-velocity surface around the
planet Hill sphere - Orbital energy in the rotating system Jacobi
integral - Approximation far from the Sun or the planet
Tisserand parameter
21Orbital evolutions at close encounters
- Many comets have low-inclination orbits and
experience close encounters with Jupiter - The Tisserand criterion was used to identify the
same comet before and after a large change of the
orbit - It can be used to plot evolutionary curves in the
(a,e) or (Q,q) planes
22Circular restricted 3-body problem (4)
- Without close encounters both a and Hz are
constant, but H may change - ? Coupled (e,?) and (i,?) variations with
constant a Kozai cycle
23Sungrazing Comets
- Comet Ikeya-Seki (1965 S1) groundbased
coronograph image - SOHO image of two comets plunging into the Sun in
1998
24Close encounters (1)
- A massive body has a sphere of influence, where
its gravitational influence exceeds that of the
Sun (e.g., the Hill sphere) - This can be defined in terms of the ratio of
central to perturbing force in the planetocentric
or heliocentric frame
25Close encounters (2)
- Approximate treatment as hyperbolic deflections
(scattering problem) - The approach velocity U is conserved
- U2 3 - T
- As the direction of the velocity vector is
changed, the heliocentric motion can be either
accelerated or decelerated
- controls the values of
- E and Hz
26Nongravitational forces (1)
27Nongravitational forces (2)
- Radiation pressure
- acts to scale down the gravity by a factor
(1-?) particles with negative net force are
called ? particles - Poynting-Robertson drag
- aberration effect of absorbed light causes
the particles to get circular orbits and spiral
into the center
28Cometary outgassing
- Jet force due to net momentum of asymmetric
outgassing - Causes measurable perturbations of
- (1) orbital period (2) perihelion longitude
29Yarkovsky effect
- Jet effect due to asymmetric emission of thermal
photons with transverse component - Diurnal effect may cause a drift inward or
outward - Seasonal effect only causes a drift inward