Title: GMCVO survey on commissioning: findings
1GMCVO survey on commissioning findings
- Audience voluntary and community sector (VCS)
organisations that deliver health and social care
services in Greater Manchester. - Purpose to get a snapshot of the issues
surrounding commissioning the VCS to deliver
public services to capture views on the
Commissioning Framework for Health and
Well-being.
2Respondents facts and figures
- 31 organisations completed the survey
- Annual income one third of participating
organisations have an annual income of between
100,000 and 250,000. - Almost half have 5 20 employees. Six
organisations have less than 5 employees. - Good geographical spread across Greater
Manchester but a high proportion (42) working in
Manchester. - Range of organisations working in mental health,
BME groups, counselling, disabled groups.
3- Question one do you deliver public services?
- Yes 73
- No 27
- Question two if not, would you consider doing so
in the future? - Yes 67
- No 0
- Maybe 6
- Not applicable 28
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7The Commissioning Framework a summary
- Outcomes-based commissioning
- More local control over services
- Better partnership working, including the VCS.
- VCS organisations, particularly those which are
user-led, more involved in needs assessments and
service planning through LAAs
8The Commissioning Framework a summary
- Independent sector and VCS organisations to enter
the market and bid for public service contracts. - Market development.
- Develop new services to meet gaps in provision
- More time
- Fair, transparent procurement practices
9(No Transcript)
10Question 7 one of the proposed actions for
commissioners is to establish a local provider
forum. What are your views on this?
- Varying levels of current engagement.
- A positive response on the whole
- Provider forums must be
- independent,
- clear in their remit and role,
- open to newcomers and service users,
- adequately funded
- supported by infrastructure.
11Question 7 one of the proposed actions for
commissioners is to establish a local provider
forum. What are your views on this?
- Forums must NOT
- be a talking shop
- be dominated by commissioners and larger
organisations - exclude pan-borough organisations
- force organisations into unnecessary competition
with one another.
12Question 7 one of the proposed actions for
commissioners is to establish a local provider
forum. What are your views on this?
- Good idea to share experiences and resolve
common issues. Also an opportunity for
commissioners to get to know providers better.
13Question 7 one of the proposed actions for
commissioners is to establish a local provider
forum. What are your views on this?
- I think this is needed but it has to be truly
representative and two-sided - i.e. not just a
forum for commissioners to notify providers of
their plans.
14Question 7 one of the proposed actions for
commissioners is to establish a local provider
forum. What are your views on this?
- It will speed the process of setting us, VCS
organisations, up against one another as we
compete for the contract / money. The
consequences of this are reasonably obvious such
as reduced collaborative working.
15Question 7 one of the proposed actions for
commissioners is to establish a local provider
forum. What are your views on this?
16Question 8 how could commissioning be made
simpler so local VCS organisations can more
easily access public sector contracts?
- Less bureaucracy, simpler application process
- More flexible accreditation schemes
- Opportunities clearly advertised info shared
- Greater transparency in commissioning process
17Question 8 how could commissioning be made
simpler so local VCS organisations can more
easily access public sector contracts?
- One point of contact
- Support and training to build capacity and
navigate the tendering process more time to
prepare bids - Payment in advance development funding full
cost recovery - Training for commissioners on how VCS
organisations operate commissioners to share
info more
18Question 8 how could commissioning be made
simpler so that local VCS organisations can more
easily access public sector contracts?
- Documents are generally overwhelming for small
voluntary organisations with limited human
resources and infrastructure. Community
organisations need the support to capacity
build. -
19Question 8 how could commissioning be made
simpler so that local VCS organisations can more
easily access public sector contracts?
- Less complex forms to complete. Training for
commissioners on what they are commissioning.
Training for VCS organisations on the
commissioning process. -
20Question 8 how could commissioning be made
simpler so that local VCS organisations can more
easily access public sector contracts?
- Procurement based on lowest priceultimately
leads to larger organisations benefiting as they
can achieve economies of scale In such a context
it is difficult for new and/or smaller providers
to enter the market place. -
21Question 8 how could commissioning be made
simpler so that local VCS organisations can more
easily access public sector contracts?
22Key messages
- Support from commissioners is seen as crucial
- Tendering for contracts is complicated,
time-consuming and costly - Enthusiasm for a better engagement VCS providers
keen to expand their role in public service
delivery - A willingness to work with commissioners to help
tackle common problems