HEL Conservation Compliance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

HEL Conservation Compliance

Description:

GAO Audit Results. The audit was ... Conducted nationwide through a web-based survey; 'live' in 5 States. Audit results are not finalized as yet. OIG Audit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: bsch73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HEL Conservation Compliance


1
HEL Conservation Compliance
  • Beth A Schuler
  • National Highly Erodible Land Specialist,
    Conservation Operations Division

2
HELC/WC General Information
  • Status of the Final Rule being promulgated
  • Recent Activities
  • GAO Audit Results
  • OIG Audit Results
  • Violation Determinations Who can make them?
  • Agency Policy NFSAM now on the Web!!
  • Compliance Review Procedures
  • Equitable Relief not applicable to HELC/WC

3
Status of the Final Rule
  • The HELC/WC rule, 7 CFR Part 12 is currently
    undergoing agency and OGC review.
  • Several changes, mostly to the wetland
    conservation provisions.
  • Some clarifications to the current definitions.
  • Two statutory changes to who can make a violation
    determination.

4
GAO Audit Results
  • The audit was conducted during 2002.
  • Requested by IA Senator Harkin as a result of
    complaints received from several entities about
    USDA implementation problems
  • Conducted nationwide through a web-based survey
    live in 5 States.
  • Audit results are not finalized as yet.

5
OIG Audit
  • Audit conducted in 1 State, multiple counties
    during 2001
  • Resulted from a Whistleblower Complaint regarding
    the apparent differences found between areas in
    USDA implementation of the provisions
  • State-level data expanded to reflect National
    levels.

6
GAO Audit Results
  • Some of the findings included
  • An unwillingness of the agency to find USDA
    participants in violation of the provisions.
  • Compliance status reviews not being completed
    correctly or at the appropriate time.
  • Good Faith being given inappropriately in some
    cases.
  • NFSAM unclear or conflicting on many procedures.
  • Employees (NRCS) do not possess the skills
    necessary to implement the HELC/WC provisions.

7
OIG Audit Results
  • Current NRCS Status Review Process flawed.
  • NRCS has agreed to revise the process (currently
    using Access97 database procedure) and make the
    process a web-based procedure.
  • Conflicting policy between NRCS and FSA.
  • The agency agreed to work closely with FSA in
    ensuring that agency policy documents (NFSAM and
    6-CP) are in agreement.

8
OIG Audit Results
  • Employees inappropriately granting variances,
    good faith exemptions, and use of mediation.
  • The agency has agreed to provide training to the
    States on implementation of the HELC/WC
    provisions. Also, NRCS has agreed to provide
    training on the proper use of variances,
    exemptions, and mediation.

9
OIG Audit Results
  • NFSAM has conflicting information out of date
    information and is not available on-line.
  • NRCS has agreed to revise the NFSAM to address
    conflicting policies, update inaccurate policy,
    and make the NFSAM available on-line by August
    2003.

10
2002 Farm Bill Changes
  • Only NRCS employees may make a determination of
    HELC/WC violations to FSA.
  • The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of
    2002, Section 2002(a)(2), Conservation Compliance
    amended Section 1211 of the Food Security Act of
    1985 by adding Section 1211(b)
  • Highly Erodible Land.The Secretary shall have
    , and shall not delegate to any private person or
    entity, authority to determine whether a person
    has complied with this section.

11
2002 Farm Bill Changes
  • The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of
    2002, Section 2002(b), Conservation Compliance
    amended Section 1221 of the Food Security Act of
    1985 by adding Section 1221(e)
  • Wetland.The Secretary shall have , and shall
    not delegate to any private person or entity,
    authority to determine whether a person has
    complied with this section.

12
Agency Policy
  • NFSAM is on the WEB!
  • Part 518, Compliance Status Reviews is now
    available on the NRCS Policy Website
  • http//policy.nrcs.usda.gov/scripts/lpsiis.dll/M/
    M_180.htm

13
NFSAM, Part 518
14
Replacing Random Tract
  • Randomly selected tracts must be replaced in
    accordance with the proposed GAO audit in order
    to ensure that the compliance status review tract
    database is statistically sound in predicting the
    status of compliance across the Nation.
  • See NFSAM, Part 518.03(c) for policy on this
    activity.

15
Compliance Review Procedures
16
Compliance Review Procedures
  • NFSAM, Part 518, Compliance Status Reviews
  • GM-340, Part 413 General Policy regarding all
    NRCS reviews (being developed)
  • National Handbook for Evaluations, Assessments,
    Investigations, and Reviews (being developed)

17
Clarified Use of Variances
NFSAM Part 518.11(f)
18
Variances and Exemptions
  • Variances are issued by NRCS during the course
    of a compliance status review. Authorized
    variances are as follows
  • AC Special Condition Variance allowable only
    when there are special conditions that prohibited
    application of the conservation system due to
    severe weather, crop pest infestations, or crop
    diseases.

19
Variances and Exemptions
  • AH Special Problem Variance allowable only
    when there are special problems such as
  • Severe physical condition or death of primary
    farm operator.
  • Destruction of holdings, equipment, by natural
    disaster, fire, or similar occurrence.
  • NRCS Error that the USDA participant relied upon
    in applying the conservation system.

20
Variances and Exemptions
  • AM Minor Technical Failure may only be used
    when there is a failure to completely apply a
    conservation system that meets the soil loss
    reduction requirements. May NOT be used for NRCS
    error.

21
Variances and Exemptions
  • CA Conditionally Applying May ONLY be used
    when compliance cannot be determined at the time
    of the review due one or more major practice
    needed to be installed. This should not be used
    on any except the following cases
  • Tract coming out of CRP
  • New land entered into USDA Benefit programs

22
Variances and Exemptions
  • Exemptions are issued by FSA, either the COC or
    the State Committee. The 2 exemptions that are
    authorized are
  • Economic Hardship
  • Good Faith
  • NRCS must be consulted prior to the FSA COC
    issuing a Good Faith Exemption for either HELC or
    WC violation

23
Equitable Relief
  • The Equitable Relief provisions outlined in the
    2002 Farm Bill, Section 1613 DO NOT apply to
    violations of HELC or WC. Therefore, NRCS will
    NOT accept or grant any requests for Equitable
    Relief from a violation of these provisions.

24
Conclusion
  • For questions, assistance, training, etc.
    regarding the HELC compliance provisions, please
    call
  • (615) 646-9741 FAX (615) 673-6705
  • Email beth.schuler_at_usda.gov
  • This presentation will be available at the
    following URL http//www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/h
    elc/HELC_training_04302003.ppt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com