Ian Wooton University of Strathclyde and CEPR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ian Wooton University of Strathclyde and CEPR

Description:

If a firm (or firms) exercise an inappropriate degree of market power ... Forthcoming in James Hartigan, ed., Handbook of Trade and Law, London: Basil Blackwell ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ianwo
Learn more at: https://www.wto.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ian Wooton University of Strathclyde and CEPR


1
Ian WootonUniversity of Strathclydeand CEPR
  • Trade and competition policy
  • anti-dumping and anti-trust policies in RTAs

2
Competition policy
  • Disciplines behaviour of imperfectly competitive
    firms in the international marketplace
  • examine the different opportunities offered by
    RTAs relative to those under the multilateral
    trading regime

3
Competition in autarky
  • In a world of self-sufficient countries
  • firms produce entirely for domestic consumption
  • If firms competitive and no distortions
  • free market is efficient
  • If a firm (or firms) exercise an inappropriate
    degree of market power
  • government should use competition policies to
    address this behaviour
  • anti-trust (AT) policies

4
Competition and trade
  • When trade barriers are lowered
  • penetration of domestic markets by foreign firms
  • bringing aggregate benefits
  • If firms behave competitively
  • global efficiency with free trade and free
    markets
  • If foreign firms exercise market power
  • government intervention justified
  • but limited instruments available

5
Policy responses
  • Exporting country options
  • use AT policies to discipline firm
  • often not in national interest
  • Importing country options
  • does not have ability to use AT rules
  • resurrect trade barriers
  • losing all the gains from trade
  • implement anti-dumping (AD) policies
  • only affects goods in import market
  • prevents price discrimination

6
AT versus AD 1
  • AT focused on encouraging competition
  • AT rules designed to ensure firms do not undercut
    the benefits of market integration by collusive
    behaviour
  • whereas AD often works to reinstate some of this
    lost power
  • If governments had single goal of promoting
    efficiency and competition
  • AT the superior instrument
  • increasingly seems that AD being used to pursue
    other goals

7
AT versus AD 2
  • Advantage of AD over AT
  • does not need supranational powers
  • Disadvantage of AD over AT
  • does not directly address misuse of market power,
    except for predation
  • only works indirectly
  • often the disadvantages of AD overwhelm the
    advantages
  • Could be complementary policies
  • AT for domestic markets
  • AD to deal with foreign firms

8
Anti-dumping legislation
  • AD a twentieth century phenomenon
  • particularly rapid growth in 1990s
  • when developing countries increasingly adopted AD
    legislation
  • by 2000, more than 90 of world trade potentially
    subject to AD actions
  • may have pervasive effects even when duties not
    imposed
  • Strong correlation with trade liberalization
  • a pressure safety valve for system?
  • an instrument of retaliation?

9
AD and RTAs
  • Preferential trading is flourishing
  • what is relationship between competition policy
    and RTAs?
  • does RTA creation result in the elimination of AD
    on intra-regional trade?
  • is AD replaced by AT?
  • No clear pattern has emerged
  • seems to depend on goals of the RTA

10
RTA examples polar extremes
  • EU
  • has substituted AD with AT for intra-union trade
  • applies common AD procedures for third-country
    trade
  • driven by goal of single market
  • NAFTA
  • on AD, only concession by US was establishment of
    bi-national panels
  • no harmonization of AT
  • no acceptance of supranational authority

11
Multi-dimensional integration 1
  • Both trade liberalization and competition policy
    can be pursued multilaterally or bilaterally
  • range of available policy options
  • depends on the desired degree of integration
  • Most basic level of regional integration is FTA
  • only obligation is zero tariffs on bilateral
    trade with other member nations
  • could parallel this with elimination of AD on
    intra-regional trade
  • no reduction in national sovereignty

12
Multi-dimensional integration 2
  • Could match deeper trade integration with
    coordination on competition
  • e.g. common AD together with common external
    tariffs
  • regional AD more consistent for external firms
  • AD more effective as protection
  • ambiguous welfare implications
  • common AT policies part of achieving a common
    market

13
Conclusions
  • RTAs can facilitate the multilateral process in
    moving towards free trade
  • by removal of intra-regional AD policies in
    addition to tariff elimination
  • This is especially true given
  • the increasing complexity of the multilateral
    negotiations, and
  • the expected expansion in RTAs

14
Reference
  • Ian Wooton and Maurizio Zanardi
  • Trade and Competition Policy Anti-Dumping
    versus Anti-Trust
  • Forthcoming in James Hartigan, ed., Handbook of
    Trade and Law, London Basil Blackwell

15
Growth of anti-dumping laws
As of 31 December 1989
16
Growth of anti-dumping laws
As of 31 December 2001
17
Growth of WTO and AD laws
18
Stages of bilateral integration

Trade Competition policy
Self sufficiency(autarky) Autonomous competition (AT) policy
Unilateral tariffs Unilateral AD actions
RTA(free bilateral trade) Bilateral removal of AD
Customs union(common external tariff) Common external AD policy
Common market Common AT policy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com