Understanding Russias International Energy Politics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding Russias International Energy Politics

Description:

Understanding Russia's International Energy Politics. Vladimir Milov. Columbia University ... but a stable and effective international legal regime for transit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: law8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding Russias International Energy Politics


1
Understanding Russias International Energy
Politics
  • Vladimir MilovColumbia UniversityNew York,
    October 30th, 2007

2
What drives Russias tough behavior on the
international energy arena?
SUBJECTIVE MOTIFS
OBJECTIVE MOTIFS
3
Understanding Russias motivation the case of
gas supply disruption to Ukraine in January 2006
  • Experts are divided on the issue in two camps
  • One camp argues that the disruption was driven
    solely by economic factors
  • Others insist that it was plainly political
  • In fact, neither of these polarized opinion camps
    provide a good complex explanation of the
    situation
  • In fact, the incident was a complicated mix of
    economic and political motivations (see previous
    slide)

4
Russia-EU growing philosophy gap
  • Commercial energy ties between Russia and the EU
    develop fairly intensively
  • However, policy model gap is becoming seriously
    worrying
  • Two different policy philosophies EUs movement
    towards broader competition (both in economy and
    politics) strongly contradicts with Russian
    leaning towards greater monopolization in
    politics and markets
  • Although certain European monopolies tend to
    support Gazprom (E.ON, ENI, etc.), this may as
    well change by entering European downstream,
    Gazprom becomes their direct competitor, and some
    of these companies potential acquisition targets

5
Russias relations with energy transit countries
  • Russia is fundamentally dependent on energy
    transit and will always be
  • New transit countries simply replace old ones
    now Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Turkey, tomorrow
    Bulgaria, Germany, Finland/Estonia
  • 3 of 5 already signed contracts for gas supplies
    via Nord Stream are providing gas supplies to
    countries other than Germany it makes Germany
    just another transit country, the other version
    of Ukraine
  • Economics of bypassing pipelines (Blue Stream,
    Nord Stream) are utterly controversial
  • Russia needs not bypasses, but a stable and
    effective international legal regime for transit
  • Denial to ratify ECT backfires

6
Nord Stream will it ever be build?
Map Nord Stream AG
  • After Estonian rejection, will Finland agree the
    construction of Nord Streams subsea section in
    its EEZ?
  • How much the pipeline construction will cost?
    (Recent estimates show that the total
    construction costs of the on-surface and subsea
    sections altogether make up USD 13bn, will
    possibly increase to USD 15bn or more.)

7
Chinese dimension
  • Construction of the Eastern Siberian oil pipeline
    is underway however, the economics of the
    project remain highly controversial
  • Development of the Altai gas pipeline project
    had apparently stalled after a disagreement on
    gas supply prices

8
Does the Chinese gas market make a good
alternative to the European market from the
commercial point of view?
Source BP Statistical Review of World Energy
Why go?
9
Central Asia broader diversity a question of time
Map Petroleum Economist
  • Kazakhstan-China oil pipeline already built
  • Turkmenistan-China gas pipeline the most
    realistic alternative for Turkmen gas

10
Turkmen gas more and more expensive for Russia
Monetized equivalent of a price used in
barter transactions As suggested by Turkmen
President G.Berdymukhammedov in September 2007
11
Russian upstream challenges
  • Oil and gas upstream is brought to stagnation
    amid greater state interference
  • Brownfield growth potential exhausted
  • No experience (and even culture) of offshore
    development
  • Protectionist political mainstream and regulatory
    regime are unfavorable for long-term greenfield
    investments
  • Private sector nearly demolished but state
    companies are burdened with intolerable debts
  • What next???

12
Whats the price paid for re-nationalization of
oil assets?
Debt to revenue ratio by Russian and
international oil gas companies, end of 2006,
Source companies financial statements
13
Shtokman partnership is it going to work?
  • If one tries to analyze Shtokman case, he should
    really pay attention to the lessons of
    Prirazlomnoye field development
  • Gazproms lobbying of inefficient solutions
    (large platform in an icy area) and hunger for
    complete control made BHP Billiton withdraw from
    the project
  • So may be the case for Total and StatoilHydro
  • Whats a special purpose company? No rights, no
    involvement in decision making only financial
    and technological donorship

Map StatoilHydro
14
Conclusions
  • Russian monopoly philosophy may generate
    tactical advantages, but will inevitably lead to
    a long-term failure
  • The state had dismantled the efficient
    development model in the energy sector
    (privatization and opening to foreign capital),
    but is not offering any viable alternative
  • Because of Russias monopolistic bias,
    relations with vital energy partners continue to
    deteriorate
  • Upstream outlook for oil gas production is not
    at all bright
  • A superpower?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com