ADULT AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE DURING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

ADULT AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE DURING

Description:

High-resolution spin-echo (T1-weighted) images acquired ... by-slice basis for each participant, using high-resolution structural images. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: susanne78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ADULT AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE DURING


1
ADULT AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE
DURING VISUAL TARGET DETECTION MEASURED BY
FUNCTIONAL MRI David J. Madden1, Scott A.
Huettel1,3, Wythe L. Whiting1, Niko J. Harlan1,
Linda K. Langley1, James M. Provenzale2, and
Gregory McCarthy2,3 Departments of 1Psychiatry
and Behavioral Sciences, 2 Radiology, and 3Brain
Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, NC author contact
djm_at_geri.duke.edu

Time Course of Active Voxels
  • Visual Target Detection (Oddball) Task

INTRODUCTION
  • Age Similarity Middle Frontal Gyrus Response
    to Targets

Previous fMRI research with visual oddball
detection tasks suggests that, in younger adults,
prefrontal cortical regions (especially the
middle frontal gyrus) are activated by infrequent
events that require a differential response,
either overt or covert (Kirino et al., 2000
McCarthy et al., 1997). One goal of this
experiment was to determine whether an
age-related change in prefrontal activation would
be evident in the visual oddball task. We extend
previous fMRI studies of the oddball task, which
have focused primarily on prefrontal regions, by
imaging midbrain and visual cortical regions as
well. A second goal was to obtain additional
information regarding age-related changes in the
form of the hemodynamic response. Previous
research comparing younger and older adults
hemodynamic response, during fMRI, indicates that
the form of the hemodynamic response is similar
for the two age groups, although activation is
more extensive spatially and less variable for
younger adults than for older adults (Huettel et
al., 2001). These previous findings reflect the
response of visual cortical regions during a
sensory task (checkerboard viewing), and we
sought to extend these analyses to the response
of additional cortical regions during a more
cognitive task.
Participants instructed to use one response
button for standards and novels, the other
response button for targets. Display Duration
500 ms. Novels and targets separated by a
minimum of 5 standards. During fMRI scanning,
participants performed 6 blocks of 180 trials,
including 939 standards, 66 novels, and 75
targets.
Targets
Novels
  • Age Difference Anterior Cingulate Response to
    Targets

METHOD
  • Participants
  • Healthy, right-handed, community-dwelling
    individuals 16 younger adults (19-25 years 8
    female) 15 older adults (60-70 years 8 female).
    The two groups were comparable in education and
    WAIS Vocabulary, but the older adults were worse
    in corrected visual acuity and on psychometric
    tests of memory, psychomotor speed, and executive
    functioning.
  • Imaging Parameters
  • Structural
  • Sagittal localizer images (9 T1-weighted).
  • High-resolution spin-echo (T1-weighted) images
    acquired
  • at locations selected to encompass majority of
    prefrontal,
  • basal ganglia, and visual cortical regions. There
    were
  • 14 contiguous near-axial oblique slices (5 mm
    thick)
  • selected parallel to the AC-PC plane.
  •  
  • Functional
  • Spiral gradient-echo functional images at 1.5T.
    TR 1 sec, TE 40 ms, NEX 1,
  • Flip Angle 81o, FOV 24 cm, voxel size 3.75
    mm2 (642 matrix).
  •   
  • Functional images acquired at same slice location
    as structural images.
  • Age Difference Lateral Occipital Gyrus
    Response to Novels

RESULTS Functional Imaging
Peak of Average Response of All Voxels, 5 sec
After Display Onset Young Adults
Older Adults Z-Score
Z-Score Targets Novels diff Target
s Novels diff IFG 1.51 3.26 p lt
.01 2.66 1.81 n.s. MFG 3.07 2.5 p lt
.05 2.45 1.54 n.s. SFG -0.28 0.7 n.s. -0.76 -
1.28 n.s. MOT 2.82 1.83 n.s. 2.7 1.43 n.s.
ACG 5.23 -0.29 p lt .001 1.51 -0.41 p lt
.01 CAU 3.51 -0.4 p lt .001 1.6 0.78 n.s. INS
6.52 2.02 p lt .01 2.12 2.41 n.s. PUT 3.31 0.7
6 p lt .01 1.59 0.9 n.s. THA 5.45 1.98 p lt
.01 1.92 2.08 n.s. CUN 2.56 0.84 n.s.
0.93 0.57 n.s. FFG -0.05 0.14 n.s. -0.19 0.33
n.s. LOG 1.13 2.35 n.s. 0.88 1.98 n.s.
Red significant increases above baseline for
targets at p lt .01 Black significant increases
above baseline for novels at p lt .01 diff
difference in activation between targets and
novels 5 sec after display onset
  • Age Difference Fusiform Gyrus Response to
    Novels

CONCLUSIONS
  • Activation to novels occurs in visual processing
    regions and is greater for younger adults than
    for older adults, representing an age-related
    decline in visual sensory processing for these
    task conditions.
  • Anterior cingulate activation to targets is
    relatively greater for younger adults, which may
    represent more efficient attentional focus.  
  • Activation of prefrontal cortex (MFG) to targets
    is similar for younger and older adults.
  • Task-related activation is not limited to
    prefrontal cortex and occurs throughout midbrain
    and visual regions.

Regions of Interest (ROIs) ROIs were drawn on a
slice-by-slice basis for each participant, using
high-resolution structural images. The ROIs
included prefrontal regions (superior, middle,
inferior prefrontal gyri, motor cortex, anterior
cingulate), midbrain (caudate, putamen, thalamus,
insula), and visual regions (cuneus, lateral
occipital gyrus, fusiform gyrus).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com