Working Group 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Working Group 4

Description:

Architectural awareness (trade-offs and risks) ... and bad architectural experience at this ... and relate answer to business goal (rather than engineering) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: Ste8271
Category:
Tags: group | working

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Working Group 4


1
Working Group 4
  • Architectural Compentency

2
What does it mean for an organization to be
proficient at Architectural Centric Practices?
  • Business Success

3
  • How do you measure success
  • backwards looking derived from history?
  • is it forward looking? ability to meet new
    opportunities?
  • Architecture as a process
  • Cost / benefit of process?
  • Where is the value?
  • Hardware/Software?

4
What are the lynchpins?
  • Social and technical indicators
  • Business strategy and technical strategy must
    be aligned with good flow of information.
  • Architectural awareness (trade-offs and risks)
  • Ability to make decisions and awareness of
    rationality behind decision (indicator evidence).
  • Salary company values architects
  • Defined role of architect with clearly defined
    responsibility and authority.
  • Who are my peers?
  • Are the current architects competent?
  • Does management understand they are competent?
  • More than just technical skills.

5
Lynchpins contd
  • Single point of accountability who is in
    charge?!
  • Wide awareness, domain, technology, attends
    conference. Organization recognizes need for
    personal growth.
  • Defined role and responsibility or clear
    ability to organize
  • Communication clear understandable exchange of
    information. Facilitates communication between
    team members. Happy to share knowledge.
  • Effective team player.
  • Architect is ready to move on (not entrenched or
    defending their position)
  • Willing to share knowledge, enable someone else
    to do their job.

6
Lynchpins contd
  • Can assessor understand architecture after a
    reasonable time?
  • How well is architectural knowledge shared in the
    organization?
  • Truck number?
  • Are documentation artifacts used?
  • How is architectural knowledge persisted/communica
    ted? Transferrable?
  • Domain expertise?
  • Just enough architecture?

7
What are the key indicators?
  • Please give me a good and bad architectural
    experience at this company?
  • Value of architecture to company
  • Do those in charge understand it?
  • When is the architecture engaged in the software
    development lifecycle?
  • Would you put the architect in front of the
    customer.
  • Does the architect have access to the customer?
    (how many tiers between customer and architect?)
  • Is architect on management team?
  • Architect can answer what is good about your
    architecture? and relate answer to business goal
    (rather than engineering)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com