Caution for identification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Caution for identification

Description:

Several attempts have been undertaken to set up an African ... Plan and Fund are an integral part of the CoP14 compromise! 4. Who is responsible for what ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: citessec
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Caution for identification


1
www.CITES.org
THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT FUND
Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
2
This presentation
  • Results from the consultancy paper
  • Setting up the Steering Committee
  • Possible issues for discussion

3
History
  • Several attempts have been undertaken to set up
    an African elephant Fund, most notably after
    CoP10 (Harare,1997)
  • Main reasons for failures included competition
    for donors lack of influence with donors
  • Plan and Fund are an integral part of the CoP14
    compromise!

4
Who is responsible for what
  • The development of an African elephant Plan is
    clearly directed to the range states
  • The establishment of the Fund and the Steering
    Committee is directed to the CITES Secretariat
  • Call on donors
  • Steering Committee governs Fund and decides on
    organization and administration of the Fund

5
Main types of funds
  • Endowment funds
  • Sinking funds
  • Revolving funds

6
Endowment funds
  • Only return on investment is used for project
    financing
  • Main body of money stays intact
  • Example A usd 4 million endowment would result
    in usd 200,000 available per year if return on
    investment is 5

7
Sinking funds
  • Most traditional type of funds
  • All funds made available are as soon as possible
    spend on projects
  • After a certain amount of time (could be fixed)
    all money is spend and the fund stops
  • Example usd 100,000 can finance 4 small projects
    before the fund is liquidated

8
Revolving funds
  • Main body of funds is replenished yearly from a
    funding source
  • The funding source should be sustainable for the
    fund to be a success
  • Example A percentage of park entry fees goes to
    the fund

9
Analysis
  • Traditional public funds cannot cover the total
    financial requirements for elephant conservation
  • Overall funding for biodiversity has steadily
    declined over the years
  • Financing needs for elephant conservation are
    growing

10
WARNING
  • There is no pot of gold at the end of the
    rainbow!!!

11
Factors for successful funding
  • Choose the right trustee for the fund
  • Sustained fund raising with private foundations
    and corporations
  • Grassroots initiation of projects
  • Technical experts to review proposals
  • Clear action plan to guide funding decisions
  • Participation of all stakeholders

12
Factors for successful fundingcontinued
  • A clear unique mission statement for the fund
  • Broad consultative process involving both donors
    and recipients
  • Low overhead, streamlined decision making process
    and effective grant management

13
Elephant fund advantages
  • Developed as a consensus proposal by range States
  • Strong response in donor states to elephant
    conservation
  • Options to start databases, small grants while a
    major fund is pursued
  • Emphasise unique role of elephants in ecosystems

14
Elephant fund disadvantages
  • Biodiversity funding is declining, budget
    austerity for CITES
  • CITES secretariat is a small trustee with little
    resources
  • Single species funding is difficult
  • Competition from other species
  • Fund goes beyond CITES mandate

15
The Plan and the Fund
  • Outline for a Plan is a minimum requirement to
    set up a Steering Committee

16
Setting up the Steering Committee
  • The Secretariat wants to establish a balanced
    credible and competent Steering Committee
  • Discussions here to result in an interim Steering
    Committee to be formalised at Standing Committee
    SC 58 July 2009

17
Possible issues for discussion
  • Internal procedures of the Steering Committee
  • Selection of projects
  • Secretariat of the Fund

18
Internal procedures of the Steering Committee
  • Donors and range states
  • Objectivity of the Steering Committee and
    impartial decision making
  • Total number of persons on the Committee
  • Chair of the Committee
  • Rules of procedure

19
Selection of projects
  • Selection on content
  • Selection on technical criteria

20
Selection on content
  • Role of the elephant Plan
  • Role of other strategies, roadmaps etc.
  • Role of expert advise

21
Selection on technical criteria
  • Maximum amount of money per project
  • Need for co-financing
  • Number of projects per country/region
  • Frequency of applications
  • Who can apply

22
Secretariat of the Fund
  • Do we need a secretariat?
  • Management of the Funds
  • Overhead costs
  • How does the Steering Committee operate in
    practice
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com