Title: CACUBO
1CACUBO
- GASB Update
- The views expressed in this presentation are
those of presenter. Official positions of the
GASB are determined only after extensive due
process and deliberation.
2Discussion Topics
- Recent pronouncements
- Due Process documents
- Documents that will be issued during the
remainder of 2006 - Other current projects
- Research projects
-
3Effective Dates June 30
- June 30, 2006
- Statement 34 Retroactive Infrastructure Phase
I - Statement 42 Impairment of Capital Assets and
for Insurance Recoveries - Statement 44 Economic Condition Reporting
The Statistical Section - Statement 46 Net Assets Restricted by Enabling
Legislation - Statement 47 Accounting for Termination
Benefits
4Effective Dates June 30
- June 30, 2007
- Statement 27 Amortization period
- Statement 34 Retroactive infrastructure Phase
II - Statement 43 Phase I
5Effective Dates June 30
- June 30, 2008
- Statement 43 Phase II
- Statement 45 Phase I
- Statement 48 Sales/Pledges of Receivables and
Future Revenues - Statement 49 Pollution Remediation Obligations?
6Recent Pronouncements
7Statement 45
- Other Postemployment Benefits
- What Do You Need to Know?
8Commonly Asked Questions
9What Is OPEB?
- Postemployment healthcare benefits (medical,
dental, vision, hearing) - Other forms of postemployment benefits when
provided separately from a pension plan (for
example, life insurance, long-term care, cash
stipends if compensation for services)
10What are the Reporting Objectives?
- Recognize OPEB cost (expense) systematically over
periods approximating employees years of service
11What are the Reporting Objectives?
- Provide relevant information about
- (a) actuarial accrued liabilities for promised
benefits associated with past service, - (b) the annual cost of OPEB, and
- (c) progress made in funding the plan
12What is an OPEB Plan?
- The plan as understood by the employer and plan
members - Should be based on the types of benefits provided
at the time of each valuation, including any
changes made and announced to plan members
13Does an Institution Have an OPEB Plan From an
Employers Perspective?
- Not to be confused with an entity, like a
retirement system - The OPEB plan is the plan as understood by the
employer and plan members - Should be based on the types of benefits provided
at the time of each valuation, including any
changes made and announced to plan members
14How Is the Type of Plan Determined?
- The establishment of a plan is not required by
the GASB - Alternatives (if a plan is established)
- Defined Benefit Plan
- Single Employer
- Agent Multiple Employer
- Cost Sharing
- Defined Contribution Plan
- Insured Benefit
15Overview New OPEB Reporting
- Very similar to pension reporting
- Initial existing liability not required to be
reported in the financial statements disclosed - Annual expense would equal actuarially determined
cost an amount sufficient to cover the normal
cost and amortized unfunded liability
16Employee Age Timeline
Assumed age at retirement
Age when hired
Life Expectancy
Present age
17What Are the Key Features of the Parameters?
- Projection
- Based on actual experience of covered group
- Takes into consideration the established pattern
of sharing of benefit costs between the employer
and plan members to that point - Healthcare cost trend rate
18What Are the Key Features of the Parameters?
- Discounting
- Investment return assumption long-term yield on
investments expected to be used to finance
payment of benefits - If not funding, investment return for
governments own assets - Weighted average for partially funded plans
19What Are the Key Features of the Parameters?
- Allocation
- Six acceptable actuarial cost methods
- Entry age
- Attained age
- Unit credit
- Frozen entry age
- Frozen attained age
- Aggregate
20Does a Institution have OPEB If Their Employees
Pay Their Own Way?
- No, as long as retirees are insured separately
from current employees - However, if they are insured together as a group,
an implicit rate subsidy exists, and it is a
form of OPEB that is reported
21Why Are Implicit Rate Subsidies So Important?
- Costs for retirees generally are significantly
higher - Therefore, retirees that pay for the cost of
healthcare benefits through a blended (with
current employees) premium may not be actually
paying the actual costs of their benefits
22Implicit Rate Subsidy Example
23Does an Institution Need To Change When It Pays
for OPEB?
- No Funding is a policy decision that will be
made by the institution - Implications
- Net OPEB Obligation
- Discount rate used
24What Qualifies as a Contribution?
- Made direct payments of benefits
- Paid insurance premiums
- Irrevocably transferred assets to a dedicated
trust, or other third party acting in that
capacity, to fund benefits as they come due in
the future
25What Will Be Reported in the Financial Statements?
- An OPEB expense equal to annual OPEB cost for the
period, regardless of the amount paid - The cumulative difference between amounts
expensed and contributions or benefits paid will
create a liability (or asset) called the net OPEB
obligation
26Accrual-Basis Illustration(Initial Year of
Implementation)
- Normal cost (service cost for year)
29,000 - Amortization of the UAAL 30,000
- Annual required contribution (ARC) and
- annual OPEB cost/expense 59,000
- Actual employer contribution (PAYG
- amount here 42 of annual OPEB cost)
(25,000) - Increase in net OPEB obligation
34,000 - Net OPEB obligation beginning
(---0---) - Net OPEB obligation ending
34,000 - Assuming that the net OPEB obligation at
transition was set at zero (prospective
implementation)
27Note Disclosure Highlights
- Assumptions used
- Required disclosure of funded status as of the
most recent actuarial valuation (same elements of
information required as RSI in Schedule of
Funding Progress) - Linking language to RSI
28Funding Progress Schedule
29Schedule of Employer Contributions
30How Frequently Will A Valuation Be Conducted?
- OPEB plans with 200 or more total members
actuarial valuations at least biennially - OPEB plans with fewer than 200 total members
actuarial valuations at least triennially - OPEB plans with fewer than 100 total members
could choose (a) actuarial valuations or (b)
calculations using an alternative measurement
method that employs simplified assumptions
31The Alternative Measurement Method
- Includes the same three broad measurement steps
as an actuarial valuation - Is governed by most of the same parameters
- But allows simplification of certain assumptions
and techniques to permit potential application by
non-specialists
32When Is the Standard Effective?
- Three phases of Statement 34
- Separate reporting by plans would begin in
periods beginning after December 15, 2005
(12/31/06 or 6/30/07) - Institution themselves would begin reporting in
periods beginning after December 15, 2006
(12/31/07 or 6/30/08)
33GASB Publications about OPEB
- Implementation guide
- Over 250 questions and answers regarding the OPEB
standards - More than two dozen illustrations
34GASB Publications about OPEB
- What Else You Should Know about a Governments
Finances A Guide to Notes to the Financial
Statements and Supporting Information (user guide
series) - Discusses what the information in the notes and
supporting schedules means and how it can be
used, in plain nontechnical language
35Statement 47
36Termination Benefits
- Inducements or payments for early termination of
services - Voluntary and involuntary
- Recognition and measurement issues
- Voluntary when offer is accepted
- Involuntary when offer is made
- Implicit rate subsidies
- Enhancements of pension or OPEB benefits
37Termination Benefits vs. OPEB
- Determine whether the nature of arrangement is to
provide benefits - In exchange for the early termination of services
(a termination benefit) - As compensation for services (OPEB)
38Termination Benefits vs. OPEB
- Consider all relevant factors, including
- Employers intent
- Employees view of the benefits
- Whether conditioned on termination of employment
prior to normal retirement age - Length of time benefits have been made available
39Measurement Requirements
- Include
- Fringe benefits related to the termination
benefits - Directly resulting changes in estimated costs of
other employee benefits (such as compensated
absences), if reliably measurable
40Measurement Requirements
- Exclude
- Effects of termination benefit on defined benefit
pension or OPEB obligations - Account for these effects using Statement 27
(pensions) or Statement 45 (OPEB), as appropriate - Disclosure requirements of Statement 47 also
applicable
41Statement 47 Effective Date
- Periods beginning after June 15, 2005 except
for benefits provided through OPEB plans
42Medicare Part D
43Recognition
- Based on Statements 33 and 24
- Nonexchange transaction Federal Government
has not assumed the obligation - Revenues and expenses should be reported versus
netting
44TB on Medicare D
- Basis for staff position is view that Medicare D
payments are transactions separate from the
exchange of salaries and benefits for services
received by the institution.
45TB on Medicare D
- Payments to employers
- Voluntary nonexchange transactions (Statement 33)
- Payments made directly to an OPEB plan
- On-behalf payments (Statement 24)
46TB on Medicare D
- Calculations of actuarial accrued liabilities,
the ARC, and annual OPEB cost - Follow Statement 43 and 45 without reduction for
Medicare Part D payments
47Effective Date
- Effective for financial statements issued after
June 30, 2006 - Except for portions of answers pertaining
specifically to measurement, recognition, or
required supplementary information requirements
of Statement 43 or Statement 45. Those provisions
should be applied simultaneously with the
implementation of Statement 43 or Statement 45.
48Statement 48
- Sales and Pledges of Receivables and Future
Revenues
49Sales and Pledges
- Scope of the project Government receives
proceeds in exchange for the rights to future
cash flows from - Receivables
- Delinquent property taxes
- Uncollected fines
- Mortgages
- Student loans
- Future revenues
50Sales and Pledges
- Sale or Borrowing?
- Borrowing by default, unless institution can
demonstrate otherwise - Continuing involvement control
- Does the transferor government retain control, or
is control relinquished? - Criteria for receivables
- Criteria for future revenues
51Sales and Pledges
- Are receivables sold or pledged?
- Transferees ability to sell or pledge
- Isolation from seller (and its creditors)
- Legally separate
- No access to cash
- Source and timing of payments
- Satisfaction of accounts
- Bankruptcy protection
- No option or ability to replace or repurchase
accounts
52Sales and Pledges
- Are future revenues sold or pledged?
- Transferees ability to sell or pledge
- Transferors continuing active involvement in the
generation of the revenues - Excludes own-source revenues
- Taxes
- User charges
- Grants, entitlements, shared revenues could be
sold or pledged, depending on active involvement
53Effective Date
- Periods beginning after June 15, 2007
54Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution
Remediation Obligations
55Types of Remediation Obligations
- Pre-cleanup activities site assessment,
feasibility study, design - Cleanup activities neutralization, containment,
disposal activities - Oversight and enforcement costs
- Operation and maintenance of the remedy and
monitoring
56Recognition Threshold
- Determine whether one of more components of a
pollution remediation obligation are recognizable
as a liability when . . . - Institution knows or reasonably believes that a
site is polluted, and - Obligating event occurs
57Obligating Events
- Compelled to take remediation action because of
pollution-caused imminent endangerment - Violate pollution-prevention permit for
example, RCRA permit - Named, or evidence indicates govt. will be named,
as responsible party or PRP for remediation (or
cost sharing)
58Obligating Events
- Named, or evidence indicates government will be
named, in lawsuit to participate in remediation - Excludes lawsuits having no merit
- Institution commences, or legally obligates self
to commence - Limited to portion legally required to complete
59Recognition
- Recognize components of liability as they become
reasonably estimable - Recognition benchmarks
- Receipt of an administrative order
- Participation as a responsible party or PRP
- Completion of corrective measure feasibility
study - Issuance of authorization to proceed
- Remediation design and implementation
60Recognition
- Cost accumulation, not fair value
- Current value, not present value
- Expected cash flow technique would be required
- Not FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies
61Capitalization Permitted in Limited Circumstances
- Cleanup to prepare property for sale (limited to
fair value) - Polluted property bought and cleaned for use
(limited) - Asset impaired and cleanup restores lost service
utility (limited) - Acquired capital assets have future alternative
use. For example, land (limited to future
service utility) - For a. b. capitalize only if incurred within
reasonable period
62Project Timetable
- Preliminary Views March 2005
- Public Hearing June 2005
- Exposure Draft January 2006
- Comment Deadline May 1, 2006
- Statement November 2006
63Other Projects of Interest
64Current Projects
- Derivatives Preliminary Views issued in April
- Concepts Statement on Elements Exposure Draft
(ED) issued in August - Intangible Assets ED in December
- Pension Disclosures ED in December
- Recognition and Measurement Attributes
Concepts Statement
65Research Agenda
- Economic Condition Reporting
- Electronic Financial Reporting
- Intergovernmental Financial Risks
- Pension Accounting and Reporting
- Public/Private Partnerships
- Reporting Units/Statement 14 Revisited
- Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting
66Telephone (203) 847-0700 Web site www.gasb.org