Title: JLT Responsibility, Accountability, Authority Team
1JLT Responsibility, Accountability, Authority Team
- Contract Relationships
- A Working Guide
- Civil Servants and Contractor Employees
2Preamble
- We are all here, civil servants and contractor
employees, to execute NASAs mission. With this
common purpose and passion, we have different,
and yet complementary, roles that are ultimately
defined by law. Through a rigorous process, the
government has selected a company or team of
companies to provide a product and/or service.
Although contractor employees are working to meet
requirements defined by civil servants, they are
nonetheless working for a company when they do
so, and are being supervised by an individual who
works for that company. This is necessary to
ensure that the company is truly accountable for
its performance in meeting government
requirements. We are all one team with common
objectives, and yet we must recognize and honor
the distinct and complementary roles of civil
servants and contractor employees.
3Introduction
- This guide has been created to help you
understand contract relationships between civil
servants and contractor employees by addressing
the constraints, perceptions, situations and
objectives. For example - Constraints
- It is necessary to ensure that the contractor
employees are not perceived as civil servants.
With a civil servant supervisor, contractor
employees could be viewed as an unlawful
extension of the civil service work force. -
- Situations
- Contractor and Civil Servant employees desire
strong relationships and more involvement to
perform successfully. - When contractor employees are co-located with
civil servants, lines of responsibility and
oversight can become blurred. - Some tensions may develop between groups
regarding interaction, performance and benefits,
which can become amplified when combined with
tensions due to contract structure, contract
longevity, and personal issues, etc. -
- Perceptions
- While not having direct supervisory authority
over contractor employees, some civil servants
are the technical expert in subject areas, and
may be incorrectly perceived to have supervisory
authority -
- Objectives
- We must create and sustain an open, honest and
professional environment where all questions and
concerns relative to the mission are encouraged
to be brought forward and are addressed in a
straightforward and cooperative manner. - Spirited discussions around technical, cost and
schedule issues are necessary to achieve the
complex activities we are responsible to the
American taxpayer to provide. These discussions
must not become personal. - We are all part of a team which includes civil
servants, prime contractor employees and
subcontractor employees. -
4Key Concepts
- Contract Terms and Conditions establish Civil
Servant/Contractor Employee Relationships - Contracting Officers (COs) and Contracting
Officer Technical Representatives (COTRs) are
responsible for oversight of contracts - - CO is the only person with authority to
enter into or change contracts - - COTR provides technical
direction/clarification of contract requirements - - COTRs may have Technical Manager
Representatives and Performance - Monitors assisting them in accordance
with delegated authority. - Contractor employees work for, and are supervised
by, the company that employs them - - Civil Servants, including COTRs and COs, do
not supervise any - individual contractor employees
- Personal Services Contracts are prohibited by the
Federal Acquisition Regulations unless
specifically authorized by statute - A personal services contract is characterized by
an employer-employee relationship between the
Government and the contractors personnel. Such
a relationship occurs when, as a result of
contract terms or manner of administration,
contractor personnel are subject to relatively
continuous supervision and control by a
Government employee. - More information is available under the Policy
tab on the JSC Procurement Website
http//procurement.jsc.nasa.gov/procpub.htm
5Contracting Officer Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers DO
- Authorize and sign contracts and modifications,
binding the Government - Ensure contractors compliance with the terms and
conditions of the contract - Delegate technical authority to a COTR (must be
in writing) - Consent to subcontract (as provided for in
contract) - Prepare and issue contract changes
- Coordinate contractor surveillance activities and
conduct performance evaluations - For questions regarding the Statement of Work,
authorized work, contract terms and conditions
and its interpretation, or other contractual
issues, contact - Civil Servants CO/COTR
- Contractor Employees Company Contracting Office
6COTR/TMRs Roles and Responsibilities
- COTRs/TMR DO
- Assure CO that the contractors performance meets
the technical requirements, terms, and conditions
of contract - Inform contractor of failures to comply with
technical requirements of the contract - Keep CO fully informed of any technical or
contractual difficulties encountered during
performance - Recommend changes to CO
- Ensure all required items, documentation, data,
and/or reports are submitted as required by the
contract - Evaluate contractor performance
- Perform final inspection and acceptance of all
work required under the contract, if delegated by
the CO. - Act as the Governments primary liaison with the
Contractor in regards to providing technical
direction and technical clarification of the SOW
7Civil Servant/Contractor Responsibilities
- Civil Servants and Contractors should
- Conduct themselves in a professional manner
- Demonstrate the JSC Expected Behaviors
- Respectful
- Trustworthy
- Accountable
- Open minded
- Utilize the respective organizations chain of
command - Civil Servants and Contractor Management Shall
- Monitor compliance to contractual requirements
and all applicable regulations and policy - Voice differences of opinions, alternate
solutions, or dissenting opinions in a
constructive manner with an open and honest
environment - Remember
- Your conduct is a reflection on NASA
8Reminders
- Contractor Employees Shall NOT
- Be Supervised by civil servant employees
- Accept tasks to contractors out of the scope of
the contract - Expect or solicit continual instruction on how to
perform services - Perform any kind of personal service contract or
inherently governmental activity - Develop contract requirements
- Inherently governmental activities normally
fall into two categories the exercise of
sovereign government authority or the
establishment of procedures and processes related
to the oversight of monetary transactions or
entitlements. See FAR 7.5- Inherently
Governmental Functions for more information.
- Civil Servants Shall NOT
- Supervise contractor employees
- Assign tasks to contractors out of the scope of
the contract - Provide continual instruction on how to perform
services - Ask a contractor employee to perform any kind of
personal service contract or inherently
governmental activity - Request contractor employees to develop contract
requirements unless contractually authorized.
9Reminders
- Civil Servants Shall NOT
- Authorize or direct a subcontract
- Direct, agree to, or authorize a change to
contract terms and conditions - Approve leave for contractor employees
- Authorize flexible work hours for contractor
employees - Direct or authorize contractor employees to work
overtime - Only COs are authorized to perform this function
- Contractor Employees Shall NOT
- Accept a directed subcontract from anyone but the
CO - Accept direction, agree to, or authorize a change
to contract terms and conditions from anyone but
the COs - Request approval of leave for contractor
employees from civil servants - Request flexible work hours authorization for
contactor employees from civil servants - Request directions for contractor employees to
work overtime from civil servants - Only COs are authorized to perform this function
10Reminders
- Contractor Employees Shall NOT
- Discuss with or request from Civil Servants,
hiring/firing, promotions, salary increases,
benefits, or performance issues of contractor
employees - Discuss time and attendance issues with Civil
Servants unless a contractor supervisor needs to
discuss employees leave/schedule change as it
impacts office support - Request feedback for individual contractor
employees performance evaluations from Civil
Servants - In the event you are involved in or witness these
types of activities, contact your management
immediately
- Civil Servants Shall NOT
- Discuss or request hiring/firing, promotions,
salary increases, benefits, or individual
performance issues with contractor employees - Deal with time and attendance issues unless a
contractor supervisor has contacted you to
discuss employees leave/schedule change and how
reoccurrences are impacting office support - Provide feedback for individual contractor
employees performance evaluations - In the event you are involved in or witness these
types of activities, contact your CO or COTR
immediately
11Avenues of Communication
- If for some reason you feel that the
Government/contractor relationship is
inappropriate, violates the FAR, misrepresents
the Government, or misinterprets the contract,
your concerns should be elevated in the following
manner. - Civil Servants Contractor
Employees
Elevate if issue cannot be resolved between
parties
12Avenues of Communication
- Procurement Ombudsman
- An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and
facilitate the resolution of contract-related
concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and
contractors during the preaward and postaward
phases of an acquisition. - When requested, the ombudsman will protect the
identity of the source of the concern. - The existence of the ombudsman is not to diminish
the authority of the Contracting Officer - Therefore, before consulting with an ombudsman,
interested parties must first address their
concerns to the Contracting Officer for
resolution. - The JSC Ombudsman for Procurement Matters is
- Lucy V. Kranz(281) 483-0490lucy.v.kranz_at_nasa.go
v -
- See NPR 5101.33A, Procurement Advocacy Program
http//nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?Interna
l_IDN_PR_5101_033A_page_nameChange20Historyse
arch_term5101.33 - Note that the JSC Ombudsman for Procurement is
separate from the JSC Ombuds Office. See
http//ombuds.jsc.nasa.gov for information on the
JSC Ombuds Office.
13When conducting contractor evaluations
- Evaluations should be written around the work
product, not the individual contractor employees - Ensure Government surveillance of contract
performance, NOT supervision, in order to avoid
the appearance of a personal services contract.
- It is not the governments role to grade or
discuss the performance of individual contractor
employees. - The Contracting Officer or COTR will contact the
contractor, verbally or in writing, in a timely
manner when there is concern that the product
and/or services are unsatisfactory. - The following charts provide some guidance when
writing strengths and weaknesses regarding
contractor performance - Contractors may also use this guidance when
writing self- evaluations
14Recommendations When WritingStrengths and
Weaknesses
Dos Donts
Do use objective data like metrics, if applicable, to describe technical, cost, and schedule performance in Strengths and Weaknesses. Dont Ignore metrics or areas of emphasis and fail to address how they were considered in the evaluation.
Do include significance of strengths and weaknesses. Combine strengths or weaknesses into one larger input if it is more indicative of a systemic problem, or a significant strength. Dont just say something is significant without justification. All strengths and weaknesses are not equal. Dont write an activity report, substantiate every strength and every weakness by outlining the impact (positive or negative)
Do describe performance problems in terms of products and services and against contract requirement Dont presume causes of performance problems. Dont include loss of skilled contractor personnel as weakness or discuss skills if its a completion form contract - discuss products and services.
Do use factual data versus adjective rating terms and outline benefit to the Government in the discussion of the strength. Dont use adjective rating terms to describe work such as excellent, very good, good, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory
Do include cost and schedule impacts of task/projects delayed or not performed or completed early. Dont advise contractor on how to correct weakness
Do discuss efficiencies and initiatives undertaken by the contractor. Quantify cost avoidance due to innovations of the contractor when possible. Be specific about performance. Dont let emotions get in the way of the facts, do not address an individual contractor employees performance in strengths or weaknesses comment, and do not use employee names.
15Recommendations When WritingStrengths and
Weaknesses
Dos Donts
Use adjective rating scale as a guide to assess contractors performance at evaluation factor level and lower if no other contract-specific rating tool exists. Apply rating scale too literally, at too low a level. The rating scale is intended for application to total contract performance, but can be useful guide to ensure consistency at lower levels lacking any other contract-specific rating tool.
Adequately convey the severity of a weakness that would be considered a deficiency at the contract level. A deficiency" for award fee purposes is a material failure of the contractor to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. Assume that all weaknesses are equivalent to a deficiency as used in adjective rating scale. Although it could be, having a weakness(es) may not necessarily preclude rating as excellent based on the significance of the weakness(es).
Do make each finding a complete thought since these charts will stand as the file record. Dont use uncommon acronyms.
Weaknesses should be addressed in the midterm evaluation to allow the contractor the earliest opportunity to address and improve the situation. Dont ask the contractor to write strengths and weaknesses and input should not be solely based on the contractors self evaluation.