Title: T
1CSDs Assessments Sérgio Weguelin Brazilian
Securities and Exchange Commission CSD8 April
28, 2005 New York
2International Recommendations History and
Evolution
3History and Evolution
- End of 80s
- Institutional investors
- Deregulation
- Increase in traded and settled volumes in
domestic and international markets - Growth in the importance of the securities
markets / securitization - Crisis of 1987
- Growing concern about the safety and reliability
of custody and settlement systems
4History and Evolution
G30 / ISSA
CPSS-IOSCO (SSS)
COSRA
ISSA
G-30
FIAB
G-10
1989
1990
1995
1999
2001
1993
2000
New G-30
CPSS-IOSCO (CCP)
WISE MAN
Giovaninni II
Giovaninni I
ESF
CESR/ ECB
2004
2003
2003
2001
2004
2001
2003
- G-30 Group of Thirty
- G-10 Group of Tem
- COSRA Council of Securities Regulators of the
Americas - ISSA International Securities Services
Association - FIAB Fédération Internationale des Bourses de
Valeurs (WEF) - ESF European Securities Forum
- ECB Governing Council of the European Central
Bank - CESR Committee of European Securities Regulators
- CPSS Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems
(BIS) - IOSCO International Organization of Securities
Commissions - Committee of Wise Men on the Regulation of
European Securities Markets - The Giovannini Group
5Role and Relevance of the Recommendations
6Role and Relevance of the Recommendations
- General aims
- Risks Mitigation and transparency enhancement
- Reducing systemic risk, avoiding crises and
protecting investors assets - Harmonization of practices
- Efficiency improvement and cost reduction
7Role and Relevance of the Recommendations
- Benchmark for international assessment
- Reference for self-assessment and for
implementation of best practices - Benchmark for evaluation of international rating
agencies - Driving Capital Flows among Marketplaces
8- Assessment Initiatives
- Regulatory Bodies
- Market Driven
- Rating Agencies
9Regulatory Bodies Initiatives
10Regulatory Bodies Initiatives
- CPSS-IOSCO, CESR/ESCB, FSAP, COSRA
- Require minimum standards
11Regulatory Bodies Initiatives
CPSS Committee on Payment and Settlement
Systems IOSCO International Organization of
Securities Commissions
CPSS - IOSCO
- The CPSS-IOSCO Task Force published in 2001 the
report Recommendation for Securities Settlement
Systems with 19 recommendations covering such
issues as legal risk, pre-settlement risk,
settlement risk, custody risk and other - Assessment responsibility delegated to national
authorities and the Financial Sector Assessment
Program (FSAP sponsored by IMF and WB)
12Regulatory Bodies Initiatives
ECB Governing Council of the European Central
Bank CESR Committee of European Securities
Regulators
CESR / ECB
- Jointly launched, in 2004, the report Standards
for Securities Clearing and Settlement in the
European Union based on the CPSS-IOSCO
Recommendations - While these standards have no European Community
Law status, nevertheless regulators will monitor
their implementation
13Market Driven Initiatives
14Market Driven Initiatives
- Group of Thirty (G-30), International Securities
Services Association (ISSA) and AGCs Depository
Information-Gathering Project - Push the market towards new standards and best
practices
15Market Driven Initiatives
AGC Association of Global Custodians
AGC Questionaire
- Established in 1997, AGC is an informal group of
9 North American banks that are major providers
of securities custody and trade settlement
services to institutional investors worldwide. - Applies the AGC Questionnaire (124 questions)
assessing CSDs based on the Rule 17-f7 of the
North-American SEC
16Market Driven Initiatives
ISSA International Securities Services
Association
ISSA
- Incorporated in 1989, ISSA is a private sector
organization composed of institutions such as
custodian banks, clearing organizations, central
depositories, stock exchanges, brokers, asset
managers etc - Released, in 2000, the report ISSA
Recommendations with 8 recommendations covering
industry-wide issues
17Market Driven Initiatives
G-30 Group of Thirty
G-30
- Established in 1978, is a private, nonprofit,
international body composed of very senior
representatives of the private and public sectors
and academia - Published in 1989 the first 9 recommendations on
custody and settlement - Launched the Report Global Clearing and
Settlement A Plan of Action (2003) with 20 new
recommendations
18Market Driven Initiatives
Assessment against the New G-30 20
Recommendations
New G-30
- Lead Monitoring Organizations
- ISSA (Rec. 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8)
- AGC (4, 11, 12 and 13)
- Regional Monitoring Committees (1, 4, 5, 11, 12
and 13) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (9 and 10)
- Legal Sub-committee (14, 15 and 16)
- Regional Co-chairs (17, 18, 19 and 20)
15 initial capital markets are being assessed
19Rating Agencies Initiatives
20Rating Agencies Initiatives
- Thomas Murray, Wilshire/CALPers, GSCS etc
Develop and sell reports analyzing and
attributing ratings
21Rating Agencies Initiatives
- Thomas Murray
- A rating agency and advisory company that
produces analysis of 147 CSDs and 89 capital
markets infrastructures based on proprietary risk
methodology analysis which considers 7 types of
risk - Asset Commitment Risk, Liquidity Risk,
Counterparty Risk, Asset Servicing Risk,
Financial Risk, Operational Risk,CSD on CSD
Credit Risk
22Rating Agencies Initiatives
- Wilshire/CALPers
- An advisory company that provides services for
North-American institutional investors produces
the report Permissible Equity Markets Investment
Analysis (a ranking of emerging markets) for the
CalPERS (California Pension Retirement System) - Among other factors, analyzes the efficiency of
settlements in each country with a rate from 1
(minimum) to 3 (maximum)
23Rating Agencies Initiatives
- GSCS- Global Securities Consulting Services
- An advisory and rating company that produces
reports with risk analyses on settlement and
custody activities in several markets - It calculates periodically a Settlement Index,
a Safekeeping Index and a Operational Risk
Index for each market analyzed
24For the Breakout Session
- Are these assessments appropriate?
- How to coordinate such initiatives?
- What is the real impact of so many assessments?
- What is the role of regulators in this
evaluation process?
25(No Transcript)