Depression Special Interest Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Depression Special Interest Project

Description:

Evidence-Based Depression Care Management: Program to Encourage Active, ... 87 for psychotherapy quality assurance $81 for depression management team sessions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Psychiatry7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Depression Special Interest Project


1
Prevention Research Centers (PRC)-Healthy Aging
Research Network (HAN) Webinar Series
Evidence-Based Depression Care Management
Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives for
Seniors (PEARLS) Moderated by Sheryl Schwartz
Mark Snowden
Pamela Piering
Susy Favaro
2
Sponsors Prevention Research Centers-Healthy
Aging Research Network http//www.prc-han.org/ R
etirement Research Foundation http//www.rrf.org/
National Council on Aging http//ncoa.org/index.c
fm
3
Community-Integrated Home-Based Depression
Treatment for the ElderlyMark Snowden, MD,
MPHAssociate Professor Dept. of PsychiatryUW
Health Promotion Research Center

4
Learning Objectives
  • The clinical components of PEARLS
  • The personnel involved in delivering PEARLS
  • The target population of older adults most
    suitable for PEARLS
  • Outcomes that have been demonstrated in research
    trials of PEARLS
  • Challenges and strategies for overcoming the
    challenges related to funding, client treatment
    and program management

5
PEARLS Study Goals
  • To develop a case-finding system for frail
    elderly individuals with or at high risk for
    depression
  • To develop a community-based depression treatment
    program for physically impaired and socially
    isolated older adults
  • To use this system to recruit and randomize
    participants comparing the treatment program with
    usual care

6
Depression Care ManagementCore Components
  • Active Screening to identify depressed patients
  • Measurement-based care
  • Depression care manager (MSW,Ph D, RN)
  • Supervising Psychiatrist
  • Evidence Based Treatment

7
PEARLS Intervention
  • Conducted in the home of participants, in 8
    sessions over 19 wks
  • Active screening for depression
  • PHQ-2 initially, now use CES-D-11
  • Measurement-based outcomes
  • PHQ-9
  • Trained depression care manager
  • Recruited from Agency Case managers
  • Problem Solving Treatment
  • Physical Activation (30 mins moderate activity
    5D/wk)
  • Social Activation
  • Pleasant Events

8
PEARLS Intervention
  • A supervising psychiatrist
  • Eligibility questions
  • PST supervision
  • If necessary, recommendations for medication
    management
  • Management Suicidal Ideation
  • Follow-up phone calls (1/month, for 3- 6 months)

9
Problem Solving Treatment
  • Theory
  • Overwhelming, unsolved problems increase
    depression
  • Solving Problems decreases depression
  • Patient Centered and Directed
  • Skill building

10
Problem Solving Treatment
  • 7 Steps
  • Clarify and define the problem
  • Set realistic goals
  • Generate multiple solutions
  • Evaluate and compare solutions
  • Select a feasible solution
  • Implement the solution
  • Evaluate the outcome

11
PEARLS Participant Criteria
  • Inclusion
  • Age 60
  • Diagnosis of minor depression or dysthymic
    disorder
  • Recipient of services from Senior Services or
    Aging Disability Services, or resident of
    public housing
  • Exclusion
  • Major depression and other psychiatric disorders
    (e.g., bipolar disorder and psychotic disorder)
  • Substance abuse
  • Cognitive disorder

12
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Criteria Minor
Depression
1) Depressed Mood And/Or 2) Anhedonia 3)
Anorexia/wt loss or Weight Gain 4) Insomnia or
Hypersomnia 5) Psychomotor Agitation or
Retardation 6) Fatigue 7) Feelings of
Worthlessness/Guilt 8) Indecisiveness/Trouble
Concentrating 9) Recurrent Thoughts of
Death/Suicide 2-4 of 9 symptoms
gt/ 2 wks
13
Dysthymia
  • Depressed more days than not at least 2yrs
  • Two or more symptoms when depressed
  • Never without symptoms more than 2 months

14
Recruitment of Study Participants
  • Agency referral
  • 1,238 ? 105 eligible
  • Self-referral
  • 181 ? 45 eligible
  • (marketing prospect)

15
Study Participant Demographics
16
Intervention Group
  • Intervention participants received
  • a mean of 6 in-person visits
  • a mean of 3.5 follow-up phone contacts

17
Outcome Measures
  • Response rate
  • 50 reduction in depression scores
  • Remission rate
  • no longer meets DSM criteria

18
PEARLS Study Results6 month (N138)
JAMA 2004 2911569-1577
Plt.01
Plt.01
P.07
19
PEARLS Study Results
  • Quality of Life
  • Improved Emotional Well-being
  • Improved Functional Well-being

20
Antidepressant Usage
  • 35 of all participants were on antidepressants
    at the beginning of study.
  • 7 (9.7) intervention participants started an
    antidepressant medication during the study period
    vs. 4 (6.1) participants in the usual care
    group.
  • 5 (6.7) participants in each group stopped using
    an antidepressant during study.

21
Cost Assessment
  • Mean costs of providing the PEARLS program per
    participant
  • 422 for PST intervention
  • 28 for follow-up phone calls
  • 12 in psychiatric follow-up phone calls
  • 87 for psychotherapy quality assurance
  • 81 for depression management team sessions
  • Total mean cost per participant 630

22
Conclusions
  • Dissemination of the PEARLS program within
    existing community social service organizations
    has the potential to significantly improve the
    well-being and function of depressed older adults
    served by these organizations.

23
From Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blasé KA, Friedman RM,
Wallce F. Implementation Research A Synthesis of
the Literature. Tampa, FL University of South
Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health
Institute, The National Implementation Research
Network (FMHI Publication 231), 2005. Available
at URL http//nirn.fmhi.usf.edu/resources/publica
tions/Monograph/
24
PEARLS Policy and Management
  • Pamela Piering, Director
  • Aging and Disability Services
  • Seattle Human Services Dept
  • October 23, 2008

25
Learning Objectives
  • The elements of the PEARLS intervention in a
    community setting
  • Understand the steps required to bring this new
    program from research to practice
  • Identify and explore opportunities to attract
    funding from new partners

26
Moving From Research to Practice
  • Find funding to implement PEARLS
  • AAA Advisory Council
  • .5 FTE discretionary funding 2004, now 1.0 (Older
    Americans Act)
  • Adjust present psychiatrist role to provide
    PEARLS consultation
  • Advocate for State resources new AAA pilot,
    Spokane WA

27
Research to Practice, Adaptations
  • Now serving age 50 with new funding
  • Phone follow up calls completed in 3 months
  • Initiated food voucher/food card
  • Sessions may run from 4 6 in number
  • Initiated 30 day in-home visits when team
    Supervisor determines client meets PEARLS
    criteria
  • Multiple referral sources instead of a primary
    screener.

28
Educating Policymakers
  • JAMA article, April 2004
  • ADSA funded PEARLS Toolkit now downloadable
    from UW web site
  • Bring information, results to ADS Advisory
    Council and Sponsors, Seattle, United Way and
    King County
  • Education of local funder King County Veterans
    and Human Services Levy

29
PEARLS Expansion
  • CDC new research study with University of
    Washington brings .5 FTE Implementation Manager
    to study best referral flow
  • King County Veterans and Human Services Levy
    brings 220,000 in 2008, renewable six years.
    Two new subcontractors
  • African American Elders Project
  • IDIC Filipino elders drop-in center
  • New ADS internal pilot Chinese elders
  • Three clients currently enrolled. Learning
    pros/cons of using this approach work for this
    community

30
Challenges and Opportunities
  • Training now through new UW center CHAMMP
  • Recently offered September 24-26 2008, Seattle
  • Consider adding new mental health provider for
    PEARLS through Medicaid funding
  • Document results from expansion projects, seek to
    extend funding statewide
  • Link to overall health promotion work in the
    community

31
Challenges and Opportunities
  • Identifying appropriate clients, and flow
  • Referral process
  • Encouraging Medicaid LTC clients with wellness
    focus
  • Use of incentives
  • New easy-to-use data system needed, show
    outcomes, fidelity to original
  • PEARLS counselors have many expectations in
    addition to client services training,
    education, championing, handling inquiries, etc

32
  • Prior to participating in the PEARLS program I
    lacked motivation, was severely depressed, and
    suffering from chronic pain. Having completed
    the program, I am happy to say that I have
    successfully overcome these difficulties, thanks
    to my counselor and the tools and exercises he
    presented.

33
PEARLS A Counselors Perspective
  • Susy Favaro, MSW
  • Social Worker, Northshore Senior Center

34
PEARLS Website
  • http//depts.washington.edu/pearlspr/

Questions Answers
35
Future PRC-HAN Webinars All 300-430 pm EST
  • More on Evidence-based Programs
  • Wed., October 29 Healthy IDEAS
  • Relevant to all Evidence-based Programs
  • Thurs., November 13 Money Matters
  • To Register
  • http//ncoa.org/content.cfm?sectionID64
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com