Title: Paula M' Fracasso, M'D', Ph'D'
1A First Look at HRPO05-0702 An Exploratory
Study of Neoadjuvant Cetuximab Followed by
Cisplatin, Cetuximab in Women with Newly
Diagnosed Advanced Cervical Ca
- Paula M. Fracasso, M.D., Ph.D.
- Associate Professor of Medicine
- Division of Oncology
- Washington University School of Medicine
- \
2Introduction Cervical Cancer
- Incidence and Mortality in 2006
- 2nd in incidence mortality in women in the
world - Worldwide
- Incidence 466,000
- Mortality 232,000
- US
- Incidence 9,710
- Mortality 3,700
- Bimodal peak from ages 35-39 and 60-64
- Etiology
- HPV - 1 etiologic agent in 99 tumors
- (HPV 16-most common, 18, 35, 45 and others-less
common) - Smoking
- Early frequent sexual activity with multiple
partners
3Introduction Cervical Cancer
- Staging and Treatment
- FIGO (Federation of Gynecology Obstetrics
Staging System) - Stage IA and IB1 Early stage
- Radical hysterectomy or radiation therapy
- 5 year survival 80-90
- Stage IB2-IVA Locally advanced disease
- Radiation or combined chemoradiation
- 5 year survival 65
- Late stage and recurrent disease
- Palliative chemotherapy novel agents
- 5 year survival lt5
4Randomized Trials of Chemoradiation in Cervical
Cancer
5Randomized Trials of Chemoradiation in Cervical
Cancer
6Randomized Trials of Chemoradiation in Cervical
Cancer
7Introduction EGFR
- EGFR one of 4 members of the ErbB (HER) family
encoded by the ErbB1 gene - Transmembrane glycoprotein that homo-
or heterdimerizes with family
members - Extracellular ligand binding domain
- Transmembrane domain
- Intracellular tyrosine kinase domain
- Activation of EGFR triggers signal transduction
and cell proliferation - Ligands EGF, TGF-a, amphiregulin, betacellulin,
epiregulin, heparin-binding EGF - Strictly regulated in normal cells with
controlled cell growth
8Schematic of the Signaling Pathways of the HER
Family
Yarden,Y and Sliwkowski, M.X. Nature Reviews
Molecular Cell Biology 2127-137, 2001
9Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
- In tumor cells, EGFR signaling is inappropriately
turned on - EGFR mutations
- Lung cancer
- Overexpression of EGFR
- Lung cancer and GBM
- ?Binding of intracellular ligands
- ?Other receptors/crosstalk
- ?Loss of regulatory mechanisms
(Adapted from Harari and Huang, Semin Radiat
Oncol 11 281-289, 2001)
10Lack of Correlation of EGFR Expression by IHCand
Response to Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer
- Comparison of Activity with IMC-C225/CPT-11 (in
colorectal cancer) and Trastuzumab (in breast
cancer) by Receptor Expression Level
Colorectal Cancer
Breast Cancer
Baselga, J. J Clin Onc 19 41s-44s, 2001
11Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
- EGFR is a target for cancer therapy
- Coexpression of high levels of EGFR and its
ligands lead to
transformed phenotype - Overexpression of EGFR is found epithelial tumors
and tumor-derived cell lines - EGFR is expressed in at least 60 of cervical
cancers - Overexpression of EGFR correlates with poor
patient prognosis, decreased survival, and/or
increased metastasis
EGFR Overexpression in SCC
EGFR Expression in Skin
12Cervical Cancer Trial
- Objectives
- To determine the safety of cetuximab in
combination with concurrent chemoradiation - To evaluate genes or gene mutations predictive of
response to cetuximab in women with cervical
cancer - To correlate evidence of antitumor activity of
cetuximab by CT-PET imaging - Long term goal To improve the cure rate of women
with locally advanced cervical cancer with the
addition of cetuximab with standard
chemoradiation
13Inclusion Criteria
- FIGO Clinical Stage IB-IV with measurable disease
amendable to repeat biopsy - ECOG Performance Status 0-2
- Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function
- No previous treatment for cervical carcinoma
- Patients with ureteral obstruction must be
treated with stent or nephrostomy tube placement
14Schema of Cervical Cancer Trial
Baseline cervical biopsy CT-PET scan Part A
Administer cetuximab on days 1, 8, 15 Repeat
cervical biopsy CT-PET scan Part B Administer
chemoradiation cetuximab Part C Administer
cetuximab for 12 weeks Repeat cervical biopsy
CT-PET scan
15Patient Characteristics
16Incidence of Hematologic Toxicity
17Incidence of Non-Hematologic Toxicities - Part A
18Incidence of Non-Hematologic Toxicities Part B
19Incidence of Non-Hematologic Toxicities Part B
20Incidence of Non-Hematologic Toxicities Part B
21Incidence of Non-Hematologic Toxicities Part C
22Incidence of Non-Hematologic Toxicities Part C
23Profile of Treatment Course of Patients in Part B
24Chemotherapy Summary
25Radiation Summary
26Response by RECIST Criteria
27FDG Uptake Prior After Neoadjuvant Cetuximab
Therapy (n 7)
28Conclusions
- Part A Three weekly treatments of neoadjuvant
cetuximab was well-tolerated and no women
progressed by CT scan during this time. - -Neoadjuvant cetuximab appears to have activity
as evidenced by clinical examination and
FDG-PET/CT scan in 7 women. - Part B Gastrointestinal toxicities including
diarrhea and enteritis were severe and were felt
to be exacerbated by cetuximab given
neoadjuvantly and concurrently with cisplatin and
radiation therapy. - Part C Three women completed cetuximab
monotherapy. Two women discontinued therapy by
choice.
29Conclusions
- Treatment Modifications
- -Part A Only one weekly treatment of
neoadjuvant cetuximab will be given. Women will
have a biopsy and FDG-PET/CT scan prior to and
after this treatment. - -Part B Concurrent therapy will begin 2 weeks
after neoadjuvant therapy. Cisplatin will be dose
reduced to 30 mg/m2 and cetuximab will be dose
reduced to 200 mg/m2. If tolerated, dose
escalation will occur in a 33 design. - -Part C Cetuximab monotherapy will be
discontinued as there is no proven benefit at
this time.
30Conclusions
- Despite the gastrointestinal toxicities noted in
our patients, we are optimistic about the
activity of cetuximab in combination with
chemoradiation in women with cervical cancer. - We await microarray analyses of pre- and post-
neoadjuvant cetuximab tumor samples in hopes that
we will define biomarkers for response to this
agent in cervical cancer.
31Conclusions
- Over 400 targeted agents in clinical trials
- Cell culture and animal work may not predict
which of these therapies will be effective in
patients with cancer - Developing these agents is time-consuming,
expensive, and importantly, utilizes our most
precious resource patients - This places an increasing priority on the need
for directed early clinical trials
32Collaborators
- Preclinical
- Radiology Dr. Carolyn Anderson
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Dr. Linda
Pike - Pathology Dr. Mark Watson
- Clinical
- Medical Oncology Drs. Paula Fracasso and Tom
Fong - Gynecologic Oncology Drs. Janet Rader, David
Mutch, Matthew Powell, Nicholas Taylor, and
Israel Zighelboim - Radiation Oncology Drs. Perry Grigsby and Imran
Zoberi - Pathology Dr. Mark Watson
- Radiology Drs. Farrokh Dehdashti, Barry Siegel,
and Tom Miller - Industry
- ImClone Systems Drs. Dan Hicklin and Eric
Rowinsky - BMS Dr. David Mauro