Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Description:

Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation. Paulo Torres. SpR Trauma and Orthopaedics ... The Cochrane Review of Surgery for Lumbar Disc Prolapse and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1748
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Tor108
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation


1
Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation
  • Paulo Torres
  • SpR Trauma and Orthopaedics
  • Northern Deanery

2
Objectives
  • Review Current Scientific Evidence
  • Absolute and Relative Indications for Surgery
  • Timing of Surgery
  • List of Available Surgical Interventions
  • Comparative Effectiveness of the Various Surgical
    Interventions
  • Complications of Surgery
  • Intradiscal interventions for discogenic pain
  • Results of Surgery

3
Literature Review
  • Medline
  • Ovid
  • Cochrane
  • Spine
  • JBJS Br and Am
  • The Cochrane Review of Surgery for Lumbar Disc
    Prolapse and Degenerative Lumbar Spondylosis.
    Gibson, Grant, Waddell. 1999.
  • Management of Herniation of the Lumbar Disc.
    Review Article. Postacchini.1999.
  • Lumbar Disc Herniations. Surgical vs. Non
    Surgical Treatment. Awad and Moskovich. 2006

4
Indications for Surgery
  • Absolute
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome
  • Recent Onset, Severe and Progressive Motor
    Deficit
  • Relative
  • Failure of adequate trial of non operative
    treatment for radicular pain
  • Severe intractable radicular pain
  • Herniation into an already stenotic spinal or
    nerve root canal
  • Significant motor deficits with positive nerve
    root tension signs
  • Large extruded fragments
  • Recurrent radicular pain after successful trial
    of non operative treatment
  • The presence of a mild or moderate motor deficit
    does not necessarily affect the indication for
    operative or non operative treatment

5
Timing of Surgery
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome
  • ASAP
  • Relative Indications
  • Lack of scientific evidence on optimal timing
  • Rarely lt6 weeks
  • Period in which improvement in symptoms generally
    known to occur
  • Should not be delayed beyond 3-4 months
  • Chances of improvement in radicular pain are
    slight and decrease further after 6 months

6
Available Surgical Interventions
  • Open Discectomy
  • Microdiscectomy
  • Chemonucleolysis with Chymopapain
  • Automated Percutaneous Nucleotomy
  • Manual Percutaneous Discectomy
  • Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy
  • Endoscopic or Percutaneous Laser Discectomy

7
Cochrane Review
  • Chemonucleolysis vs. placebo
  • Chemonucleolysis vs. discectomy
  • Discectomy vs. no surgery
  • Open discectomy vs. microdiscectomy
  • Automated percutaneous discectomy vs. no surgery
  • Automated percutaneous discectomy vs. discectomy
  • Laser discectomy vs. no surgery
  • Laser discectomy vs. discectomy
  • Laser discectomy vs. Automated percutaneous
    discectomy
  • 27 RCTs Reviewed

8
Cochrane ReviewResults
  • Discectomy better than Chymopapain
  • Chymopapain better than Placebo
  • No significant difference between open and
    microdiscectomy
  • Insufficient evidence to support other surgical
    interventions Should be regarded experimental
  • Further high quality RCTs required

9
Complications of Surgery
  • Wrong Level 1.2 3.3
  • Durotomy 0.8 7.2
  • Nerve Root Lesions 0.2
  • Infection 2 3
  • Recurrent Herniations 5 15
  • Epidural Fibrosis
  • Difficult to distinguish from recurrent
    herniation
  • Contrast MRI investigation of choice
  • No correlation between extent and symptoms
  • No intervention or material shown to alter
    incidence
  • Epidural Haematoma
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome
  • Iatrogenic Instability

10
Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy
  • Proposed for the management of Discogenic pain
  • Passing a thermal resistive coil under
    fluoroscopy into the disc
  • Coil heated to 90 degrees C
  • Paucity of well controlled studies
  • No supportive scientific evidence

11
Results of Surgery
  • 85 95 good to excellent short term results
  • Long Term good to excellent results diminish to
    55 70
  • 10 18 having required additional surgery
  • Lower back pain usually the cause of
    dissatisfaction
  • No difference between surgery or conservative
  • Microdiscectomy
  • Shorter hospital stay
  • Faster return to sedentary work
  • No difference c/w open discectomy after 8 12
    weeks
  • No statistically significant difference in
    recovery of established motor deficits with or
    without surgery

12
Patient Factors Predicting Favourable Outcomes
  • Absence of Lower Back Pain
  • Radicular pain distribution with positive tension
    signs
  • Non work-related injury
  • Higher socioeconomic status
  • Minimal psychosocial stressors

13
Summary
  • Open (and probably micro) Discectomy Gold
    Standard
  • Adhere to indications for surgery
  • Patient selection influences outcome
  • Chymopapain has a role to play
  • Other interventions remain experimental
  • Bear in mind Natural History of LDH

14
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com